@article {8988, title = {Association of low-frequency and rare coding variants with information processing speed.}, journal = {Transl Psychiatry}, volume = {11}, year = {2021}, month = {2021 12 04}, pages = {613}, abstract = {

Measures of information processing speed vary between individuals and decline with age. Studies of aging twins suggest heritability may be as high as 67\%. The Illumina HumanExome Bead Chip genotyping array was used to examine the association of rare coding variants with performance on the Digit-Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) in community-dwelling adults participating in the Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology (CHARGE) Consortium. DSST scores were available for 30,576 individuals of European ancestry from nine cohorts and for 5758 individuals of African ancestry from four cohorts who were older than 45 years and free of dementia and clinical stroke. Linear regression models adjusted for age and gender were used for analysis of single genetic variants, and the T5, T1, and T01 burden tests that aggregate the number of rare alleles by gene were also applied. Secondary analyses included further adjustment for education. Meta-analyses to combine cohort-specific results were carried out separately for each ancestry group. Variants in RNF19A reached the threshold for statistical significance (p = 2.01 {\texttimes} 10) using the T01 test in individuals of European descent. RNF19A belongs to the class of E3 ubiquitin ligases that confer substrate specificity when proteins are ubiquitinated and targeted for degradation through the 26S proteasome. Variants in SLC22A7 and OR51A7 were suggestively associated with DSST scores after adjustment for education for African-American participants and in the European cohorts, respectively. Further functional characterization of its substrates will be required to confirm the role of RNF19A in cognitive function.

}, keywords = {Adult, Aging, Cognition, Genome-Wide Association Study, Geroscience, Humans, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases}, issn = {2158-3188}, doi = {10.1038/s41398-021-01736-6}, author = {Bressler, Jan and Davies, Gail and Smith, Albert V and Saba, Yasaman and Bis, Joshua C and Jian, Xueqiu and Hayward, Caroline and Yanek, Lisa and Smith, Jennifer A and Mirza, Saira S and Wang, Ruiqi and Adams, Hieab H H and Becker, Diane and Boerwinkle, Eric and Campbell, Archie and Cox, Simon R and Eiriksdottir, Gudny and Fawns-Ritchie, Chloe and Gottesman, Rebecca F and Grove, Megan L and Guo, Xiuqing and Hofer, Edith and Kardia, Sharon L R and Knol, Maria J and Koini, Marisa and Lopez, Oscar L and Marioni, Riccardo E and Nyquist, Paul and Pattie, Alison and Polasek, Ozren and Porteous, David J and Rudan, Igor and Satizabal, Claudia L and Schmidt, Helena and Schmidt, Reinhold and Sidney, Stephen and Simino, Jeannette and Smith, Blair H and Turner, Stephen T and van der Lee, Sven J and Ware, Erin B and Whitmer, Rachel A and Yaffe, Kristine and Yang, Qiong and Zhao, Wei and Gudnason, Vilmundur and Launer, Lenore J and Fitzpatrick, Annette L and Psaty, Bruce M and Fornage, Myriam and Arfan Ikram, M and van Duijn, Cornelia M and Seshadri, Sudha and Mosley, Thomas H and Deary, Ian J} } @article {8709, title = {Sex Differences in Cognitive Decline Among US Adults.}, journal = {JAMA Netw Open}, volume = {4}, year = {2021}, month = {2021 02 01}, pages = {e210169}, abstract = {

Importance: Sex differences in dementia risk are unclear, but some studies have found greater risk for women.

Objective: To determine associations between sex and cognitive decline in order to better understand sex differences in dementia risk.

Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used pooled analysis of individual participant data from 5 cohort studies for years 1971 to 2017: Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study, Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study, Cardiovascular Health Study, Framingham Offspring Study, and Northern Manhattan Study. Linear mixed-effects models were used to estimate changes in each continuous cognitive outcome over time by sex. Data analysis was completed from March 2019 to October 2020.

Exposure: Sex.

Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was change in global cognition. Secondary outcomes were change in memory and executive function. Outcomes were standardized as t scores (mean [SD], 50 [10]); a 1-point difference represents a 0.1-SD difference in cognition.

Results: Among 34 349 participants, 26 088 who self-reported Black or White race, were free of stroke and dementia, and had covariate data at or before the first cognitive assessment were included for analysis. Median (interquartile range) follow-up was 7.9 (5.3-20.5) years. There were 11 775 (44.7\%) men (median [interquartile range] age, 58 [51-66] years at first cognitive assessment; 2229 [18.9\%] Black) and 14 313 women (median [interquartile range] age, 58 [51-67] years at first cognitive assessment; 3636 [25.4\%] Black). Women had significantly higher baseline performance than men in global cognition (2.20 points higher; 95\% CI, 2.04 to 2.35 points; P < .001), executive function (2.13 points higher; 95\% CI, 1.98 to 2.29 points; P < .001), and memory (1.89 points higher; 95\% CI, 1.72 to 2.06 points; P < .001). Compared with men, women had significantly faster declines in global cognition (-0.07 points/y faster; 95\% CI, -0.08 to -0.05 points/y; P < .001) and executive function (-0.06 points/y faster; 95\% CI, -0.07 to -0.05 points/y; P < .001). Men and women had similar declines in memory (-0.004 points/y faster; 95\% CI, -0.023 to 0.014; P = .61).

Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this cohort study suggest that women may have greater cognitive reserve but faster cognitive decline than men, which could contribute to sex differences in late-life dementia.

}, keywords = {Aged, Cognitive Dysfunction, Cognitive Reserve, Cohort Studies, Executive Function, Humans, Memory, Middle Aged, Risk, Sex Factors, Time Factors, United States}, issn = {2574-3805}, doi = {10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0169}, author = {Levine, Deborah A and Gross, Alden L and Brice{\~n}o, Emily M and Tilton, Nicholas and Giordani, Bruno J and Sussman, Jeremy B and Hayward, Rodney A and Burke, James F and Hingtgen, Stephanie and Elkind, Mitchell S V and Manly, Jennifer J and Gottesman, Rebecca F and Gaskin, Darrell J and Sidney, Stephen and Sacco, Ralph L and Tom, Sarah E and Wright, Clinton B and Yaffe, Kristine and Galecki, Andrzej T} } @article {9291, title = {Association of Obesity With Cognitive Decline in Black and White Americans.}, journal = {Neurology}, volume = {100}, year = {2023}, month = {2023 Jan 10}, pages = {e220-e231}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There are disparities in the prevalence of obesity by race, and the relationship between obesity and cognitive decline is unclear. The objective of this study was to determine whether obesity is independently associated with cognitive decline and whether the association between obesity and cognitive decline differs in Black and White adults. We hypothesized that obesity is associated with greater cognitive decline compared with normal weight and that the effect of obesity on cognitive decline is more pronounced in Black adults compared with their White counterparts.

METHODS: We pooled data from 28,867 participants free of stroke and dementia (mean, SD: age 61 [10.7] years at the first cognitive assessment, 55\% female, 24\% Black, and 29\% obese) from 6 cohorts. The primary outcome was the annual change in global cognition. We performed linear mixed-effects models with and without time-varying cumulative mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG). Global cognition was set to a t-score metric (mean 50, SD 10) at a participant{\textquoteright}s first cognitive assessment; a 1-point difference represents a 0.1 SD difference in global cognition across the 6 cohorts. The median follow-up was 6.5 years (25th percentile, 75th percentile: 5.03, 20.15).

RESULTS: Obese participants had lower baseline global cognition than normal-weight participants (difference in intercepts, -0.36 [95\% CI, -0.46 to -0.17]; < 0.001). This difference in baseline global cognition was attenuated but was borderline significant after accounting for SBP and FPG (adjusted differences in intercepts, -0.19 [95\% CI, -0.39 to 0.002]; = 0.05). There was no difference in the rate of decline in global cognition between obese and normal-weight participants (difference in slope, 0.009 points/year [95\% CI, -0.009 to 0.03]; = 0.32). After accounting for SBP and FPG, obese participants had a slower decline in global cognition (adjusted difference in slope, 0.03 points/year slower [95\% CI, 0.01 to 0.05]; < 0.001). There was no evidence that race modified the association between body mass index and global cognitive decline ( = 0.34).

DISCUSSION: These results suggest that obesity is associated with lower initial cognitive scores and may potentially attenuate declines in cognition after accounting for BP and FPG.

}, keywords = {Aged, Black or African American, Cognition, Cognitive Dysfunction, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Risk Factors, United States, White}, issn = {1526-632X}, doi = {10.1212/WNL.0000000000201367}, author = {Quaye, Emmanuel and Galecki, Andrzej T and Tilton, Nicholas and Whitney, Rachael and Brice{\~n}o, Emily M and Elkind, Mitchell S V and Fitzpatrick, Annette L and Gottesman, Rebecca F and Griswold, Michael and Gross, Alden L and Heckbert, Susan R and Hughes, Timothy M and Longstreth, W T and Sacco, Ralph L and Sidney, Stephen and Windham, B Gwen and Yaffe, Kristine and Levine, Deborah A} } @article {9972, title = {Cumulative Systolic Blood Pressure and Incident Stroke Type Variation by Race and Ethnicity.}, journal = {JAMA Netw Open}, volume = {7}, year = {2024}, month = {2024 May 01}, pages = {e248502}, abstract = {

IMPORTANCE: Stroke risk varies by systolic blood pressure (SBP), race, and ethnicity. The association between cumulative mean SBP and incident stroke type is unclear, and whether this association differs by race and ethnicity remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between cumulative mean SBP and first incident stroke among 3 major stroke types-ischemic stroke (IS), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH)-and explore how these associations vary by race and ethnicity.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Individual participant data from 6 US longitudinal cohorts (January 1, 1971, to December 31, 2019) were pooled. The analysis was performed from January 1, 2022, to January 2, 2024. The median follow-up was 21.6 (IQR, 13.6-31.8) years.

EXPOSURE: Time-dependent cumulative mean SBP.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was time from baseline visit to first incident stroke. Secondary outcomes consisted of time to first incident IS, ICH, and SAH.

RESULTS: Among 40 016 participants, 38 167 who were 18 years or older at baseline with no history of stroke and at least 1 SBP measurement before the first incident stroke were included in the analysis. Of these, 54.0\% were women; 25.0\% were Black, 8.9\% were Hispanic of any race, and 66.2\% were White. The mean (SD) age at baseline was 53.4 (17.0) years and the mean (SD) SBP at baseline was 136.9 (20.4) mm Hg. A 10-mm Hg higher cumulative mean SBP was associated with a higher risk of overall stroke (hazard ratio [HR], 1.20 [95\% CI, 1.18-1.23]), IS (HR, 1.20 [95\% CI, 1.17-1.22]), and ICH (HR, 1.31 [95\% CI, 1.25-1.38]) but not SAH (HR, 1.13 [95\% CI, 0.99-1.29]; P = .06). Compared with White participants, Black participants had a higher risk of IS (HR, 1.20 [95\% CI, 1.09-1.33]) and ICH (HR, 1.67 [95\% CI, 1.30-2.13]) and Hispanic participants of any race had a higher risk of SAH (HR, 3.81 [95\% CI, 1.29-11.22]). There was no consistent evidence that race and ethnicity modified the association of cumulative mean SBP with first incident stroke and stroke type.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings of this cohort study suggest that cumulative mean SBP was associated with incident stroke type, but the associations did not differ by race and ethnicity. Culturally informed stroke prevention programs should address modifiable risk factors such as SBP along with social determinants of health and structural inequities in society.

}, keywords = {Adult, Aged, Black or African American, Blood Pressure, Cerebral Hemorrhage, Ethnicity, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Hypertension, Incidence, Ischemic Stroke, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Racial Groups, Risk Factors, Stroke, Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, United States, White, White People}, issn = {2574-3805}, doi = {10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.8502}, author = {Johnson, Kimson E and Li, Hanyu and Zhang, Min and Springer, Mellanie V and Galecki, Andrzej T and Whitney, Rachael T and Gottesman, Rebecca F and Hayward, Rodney A and Sidney, Stephen and Elkind, Mitchell S V and Longstreth, W T and Heckbert, Susan R and Gerber, Yariv and Sullivan, Kevin J and Levine, Deborah A} }