@article {8377, title = {Putative Cut-Points in Sarcopenia Components and Incident Adverse Health Outcomes: An SDOC Analysis.}, journal = {J Am Geriatr Soc}, volume = {68}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 Jul}, pages = {1429-1437}, abstract = {

OBJECTIVES: Analyses performed by the Sarcopenia Definitions and Outcomes Consortium (SDOC) identified cut-points in several metrics of grip strength for consideration in a definition of sarcopenia. We describe the associations between the SDOC-identified metrics of low grip strength (absolute or standardized to body size/composition); low dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) lean mass as previously defined in the literature (appendicular lean mass [ALM]/ht ); and slowness (walking speed <.8 m/s) with subsequent adverse outcomes (falls, hip fractures, mobility limitation, and mortality).

DESIGN: Individual-level, sex-stratified pooled analysis. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) or hazard ratios (HRs) for incident falls, mobility limitation, hip fractures, and mortality. Follow-up time ranged from 1 year for falls to 8.8 {\textpm} 2.3 years for mortality.

SETTING: Eight prospective observational cohort studies.

PARTICIPANTS: A total of 13,421 community-dwelling men and 4,828 community-dwelling women. MEASUREMENTS Grip strength by hand dynamometry, gait speed, and lean mass by DXA.

RESULTS: Low grip strength (absolute or standardized to body size/composition) was associated with incident outcomes, usually independently of slowness, in both men and women. ORs and HRs generally ranged from 1.2 to 3.0 for those below vs above the cut-point. DXA lean mass was not consistently associated with these outcomes. When considered together, those who had both muscle weakness by absolute grip strength (<35.5 kg in men and <20 kg in women) and slowness were consistently more likely to have a fall, hip fracture, mobility limitation, or die than those without either slowness or muscle weakness.

CONCLUSION: Older men and women with both muscle weakness and slowness have a higher likelihood of adverse health outcomes. These results support the inclusion of grip strength and walking speed as components in a summary definition of sarcopenia. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1429-1437, 2020.

}, issn = {1532-5415}, doi = {10.1111/jgs.16517}, author = {Cawthon, Peggy M and Manini, Todd and Patel, Sheena M and Newman, Anne and Travison, Thomas and Kiel, Douglas P and Santanasto, Adam J and Ensrud, Kristine E and Xue, Qian-Li and Shardell, Michelle and Duchowny, Kate and Erlandson, Kristine M and Pencina, Karol M and Fielding, Roger A and Magaziner, Jay and Kwok, Timothy and Karlsson, Magnus and Ohlsson, Claes and Mellstr{\"o}m, Dan and Hirani, Vasant and Ribom, Eva and Correa-de-Araujo, Rosaly and Bhasin, Shalender} } @article {8989, title = {What Cut-Point in Gait Speed Best Discriminates Community-Dwelling Older Adults With Mobility Complaints From Those Without? A Pooled Analysis From the Sarcopenia Definitions and Outcomes Consortium.}, journal = {J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci}, volume = {76}, year = {2021}, month = {2021 09 13}, pages = {e321-e327}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Cut-points to define slow walking speed have largely been derived from expert opinion.

METHODS: Study participants (13 589 men and 5043 women aged >=65years) had walking speed (m/s) measured over 4-6 m (mean {\textpm} SD: 1.20 {\textpm} 0.27 m/s in men and 0.94 {\textpm} 0.24 m/s in women.) Mobility limitation was defined as any self-reported difficulty with walking approximately 1/4 mile (prevalence: 12.6\% men, 26.4\% women). Sex-stratified classification and regression tree (CART) models with 10-fold cross-validation identified walking speed cut-points that optimally discriminated those who reported mobility limitation from those who did not.

RESULTS: Among 5043 women, CART analysis identified 2 cut-points, classifying 4144 (82.2\%) with walking speed >=0.75 m/s, which we labeled as "fast"; 478 (9.5\%) as "intermediate" (walking speed >=0.62 m/s but <0.75 m/s); and 421 (8.3\%) as "slow" (walking speed <0.62 m/s). Among 13 589 men, CART analysis identified 3 cut-points, classifying 10 001 (73.6\%) with walking speed >=1.00 m/s ("very fast"); 2901 (21.3\%) as "fast" (walking speed >=0.74 m/s but <1.00 m/s); 497 (3.7\%) as "intermediate" (walking speed >=0.57 m/s but <0.74 m/s); and 190 (1.4\%) as "slow" (walking speed <0.57 m/s). Prevalence of self-reported mobility limitation was lowest in the "fast" or "very fast" (11\% for men and 19\% for women) and highest in the "slow" (60.5\% in men and 71.0\% in women). Rounding the 2 slower cut-points to 0.60 m/s and 0.75 m/s reclassified very few participants.

CONCLUSIONS: Cut-points in walking speed of approximately 0.60 m/s and 0.75 m/s discriminate those with self-reported mobility limitation from those without.

}, keywords = {Aged, Female, Gait, Humans, Independent Living, Male, Mobility Limitation, Sarcopenia, Walking, Walking Speed}, issn = {1758-535X}, doi = {10.1093/gerona/glab183}, author = {Cawthon, Peggy M and Patel, Sheena M and Kritchevsky, Stephen B and Newman, Anne B and Santanasto, Adam and Kiel, Douglas P and Travison, Thomas G and Lane, Nancy and Cummings, Steven R and Orwoll, Eric S and Duchowny, Kate A and Kwok, Timothy and Hirani, Vasant and Schousboe, John and Karlsson, Magnus K and Mellstr{\"o}m, Dan and Ohlsson, Claes and Ljunggren, Osten and Xue, Qian-Li and Shardell, Michelle and Jordan, Joanne M and Pencina, Karol M and Fielding, Roger A and Magaziner, Jay and Correa-de-Araujo, Rosaly and Bhasin, Shalender and Manini, Todd M} }