@article {8400, title = {Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and related phenotypes: polygenic risk scores in population-based and case-control cohorts.}, journal = {Lancet Respir Med}, volume = {8}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 07}, pages = {696-708}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Genetic factors influence chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) risk, but the individual variants that have been identified have small effects. We hypothesised that a polygenic risk score using additional variants would predict COPD and associated phenotypes.

METHODS: We constructed a polygenic risk score using a genome-wide association study of lung function (FEV and FEV/forced vital capacity [FVC]) from the UK Biobank and SpiroMeta. We tested this polygenic risk score in nine cohorts of multiple ethnicities for an association with moderate-to-severe COPD (defined as FEV/FVC <0{\textperiodcentered}7 and FEV <80\% of predicted). Associations were tested using logistic regression models, adjusting for age, sex, height, smoking pack-years, and principal components of genetic ancestry. We assessed predictive performance of models by area under the curve. In a subset of studies, we also studied quantitative and qualitative CT imaging phenotypes that reflect parenchymal and airway pathology, and patterns of reduced lung growth.

FINDINGS: The polygenic risk score was associated with COPD in European (odds ratio [OR] per SD 1{\textperiodcentered}81 [95\% CI 1{\textperiodcentered}74-1{\textperiodcentered}88] and non-European (1{\textperiodcentered}42 [1{\textperiodcentered}34-1{\textperiodcentered}51]) populations. Compared with the first decile, the tenth decile of the polygenic risk score was associated with COPD, with an OR of 7{\textperiodcentered}99 (6{\textperiodcentered}56-9{\textperiodcentered}72) in European ancestry and 4{\textperiodcentered}83 (3{\textperiodcentered}45-6{\textperiodcentered}77) in non-European ancestry cohorts. The polygenic risk score was superior to previously described genetic risk scores and, when combined with clinical risk factors (ie, age, sex, and smoking pack-years), showed improved prediction for COPD compared with a model comprising clinical risk factors alone (AUC 0{\textperiodcentered}80 [0{\textperiodcentered}79-0{\textperiodcentered}81] vs 0{\textperiodcentered}76 [0{\textperiodcentered}75-0{\textperiodcentered}76]). The polygenic risk score was associated with CT imaging phenotypes, including wall area percent, quantitative and qualitative measures of emphysema, local histogram emphysema patterns, and destructive emphysema subtypes. The polygenic risk score was associated with a reduced lung growth pattern.

INTERPRETATION: A risk score comprised of genetic variants can identify a small subset of individuals at markedly increased risk for moderate-to-severe COPD, emphysema subtypes associated with cigarette smoking, and patterns of reduced lung growth.

FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health, Wellcome Trust.

}, keywords = {Adult, Case-Control Studies, Cohort Studies, Female, Forced Expiratory Volume, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Phenotype, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Risk Factors, Vital Capacity}, issn = {2213-2619}, doi = {10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30101-6}, author = {Moll, Matthew and Sakornsakolpat, Phuwanat and Shrine, Nick and Hobbs, Brian D and DeMeo, Dawn L and John, Catherine and Guyatt, Anna L and McGeachie, Michael J and Gharib, Sina A and Obeidat, Ma{\textquoteright}en and Lahousse, Lies and Wijnant, Sara R A and Brusselle, Guy and Meyers, Deborah A and Bleecker, Eugene R and Li, Xingnan and Tal-Singer, Ruth and Manichaikul, Ani and Rich, Stephen S and Won, Sungho and Kim, Woo Jin and Do, Ah Ra and Washko, George R and Barr, R Graham and Psaty, Bruce M and Bartz, Traci M and Hansel, Nadia N and Barnes, Kathleen and Hokanson, John E and Crapo, James D and Lynch, David and Bakke, Per and Gulsvik, Amund and Hall, Ian P and Wain, Louise and Weiss, Scott T and Silverman, Edwin K and Dudbridge, Frank and Tobin, Martin D and Cho, Michael H} } @article {9037, title = {Polygenic transcriptome risk scores for COPD and lung function improve cross-ethnic portability of prediction in the NHLBI TOPMed program.}, journal = {Am J Hum Genet}, year = {2022}, month = {2022 Mar 31}, abstract = {

While polygenic risk scores (PRSs) enable early identification of genetic risk for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), predictive performance is limited when the discovery and target populations are not well matched. Hypothesizing that the biological mechanisms of disease are shared across ancestry groups, we introduce a PrediXcan-derived polygenic transcriptome risk score (PTRS) to improve cross-ethnic portability of risk prediction. We constructed the PTRS using summary statistics from application of PrediXcan on large-scale GWASs of lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1~s [FEV] and its ratio to forced vital capacity [FEV/FVC]) in the UK Biobank. We examined prediction performance and cross-ethnic portability of PTRS through smoking-stratified analyses both on 29,381 multi-ethnic participants from TOPMed population/family-based cohorts and on 11,771 multi-ethnic participants from TOPMed COPD-enriched studies. Analyses were carried out for two dichotomous COPD traits (moderate-to-severe and severe COPD) and two quantitative lung function traits (FEV and FEV/FVC). While the proposed PTRS showed weaker associations with disease than PRS for European ancestry, the PTRS showed stronger association with COPD than PRS for African Americans (e.g., odds ratio [OR]~= 1.24 [95\% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08-1.43] for PTRS versus 1.10 [0.96-1.26] for PRS among heavy smokers with >= 40 pack-years of smoking) for moderate-to-severe COPD. Cross-ethnic portability of the PTRS was significantly higher than the PRS (paired t test p~<~2.2~{\texttimes}~10 with portability gains ranging from 5\% to 28\%) for both dichotomous COPD traits and across all smoking strata. Our study demonstrates the value of PTRS for improved cross-ethnic portability compared to PRS in predicting COPD risk.

}, issn = {1537-6605}, doi = {10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.03.007}, author = {Hu, Xiaowei and Qiao, Dandi and Kim, Wonji and Moll, Matthew and Balte, Pallavi P and Lange, Leslie A and Bartz, Traci M and Kumar, Rajesh and Li, Xingnan and Yu, Bing and Cade, Brian E and Laurie, Cecelia A and Sofer, Tamar and Ruczinski, Ingo and Nickerson, Deborah A and Muzny, Donna M and Metcalf, Ginger A and Doddapaneni, Harshavardhan and Gabriel, Stacy and Gupta, Namrata and Dugan-Perez, Shannon and Cupples, L Adrienne and Loehr, Laura R and Jain, Deepti and Rotter, Jerome I and Wilson, James G and Psaty, Bruce M and Fornage, Myriam and Morrison, Alanna C and Vasan, Ramachandran S and Washko, George and Rich, Stephen S and O{\textquoteright}Connor, George T and Bleecker, Eugene and Kaplan, Robert C and Kalhan, Ravi and Redline, Susan and Gharib, Sina A and Meyers, Deborah and Ortega, Victor and Dupuis, Jos{\'e}e and London, Stephanie J and Lappalainen, Tuuli and Oelsner, Elizabeth C and Silverman, Edwin K and Barr, R Graham and Thornton, Timothy A and Wheeler, Heather E and Cho, Michael H and Im, Hae Kyung and Manichaikul, Ani} } @article {9419, title = {The genetic determinants of recurrent somatic mutations in 43,693 blood genomes.}, journal = {Sci Adv}, volume = {9}, year = {2023}, month = {2023 Apr 28}, pages = {eabm4945}, abstract = {

Nononcogenic somatic mutations are thought to be uncommon and inconsequential. To test this, we analyzed 43,693 National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine blood whole genomes from 37 cohorts and identified 7131 non-missense somatic mutations that are recurrently mutated in at least 50 individuals. These recurrent non-missense somatic mutations (RNMSMs) are not clearly explained by other clonal phenomena such as clonal hematopoiesis. RNMSM prevalence increased with age, with an average 50-year-old having 27 RNMSMs. Inherited germline variation associated with RNMSM acquisition. These variants were found in genes involved in adaptive immune function, proinflammatory cytokine production, and lymphoid lineage commitment. In addition, the presence of eight specific RNMSMs associated with blood cell traits at effect sizes comparable to Mendelian genetic mutations. Overall, we found that somatic mutations in blood are an unexpectedly common phenomenon with ancestry-specific determinants and human health consequences.

}, keywords = {Germ-Line Mutation, Hematopoiesis, Humans, Middle Aged, Mutation, Mutation, Missense, Phenotype}, issn = {2375-2548}, doi = {10.1126/sciadv.abm4945}, author = {Weinstock, Joshua S and Laurie, Cecelia A and Broome, Jai G and Taylor, Kent D and Guo, Xiuqing and Shuldiner, Alan R and O{\textquoteright}Connell, Jeffrey R and Lewis, Joshua P and Boerwinkle, Eric and Barnes, Kathleen C and Chami, Nathalie and Kenny, Eimear E and Loos, Ruth J F and Fornage, Myriam and Redline, Susan and Cade, Brian E and Gilliland, Frank D and Chen, Zhanghua and Gauderman, W James and Kumar, Rajesh and Grammer, Leslie and Schleimer, Robert P and Psaty, Bruce M and Bis, Joshua C and Brody, Jennifer A and Silverman, Edwin K and Yun, Jeong H and Qiao, Dandi and Weiss, Scott T and Lasky-Su, Jessica and DeMeo, Dawn L and Palmer, Nicholette D and Freedman, Barry I and Bowden, Donald W and Cho, Michael H and Vasan, Ramachandran S and Johnson, Andrew D and Yanek, Lisa R and Becker, Lewis C and Kardia, Sharon and He, Jiang and Kaplan, Robert and Heckbert, Susan R and Smith, Nicholas L and Wiggins, Kerri L and Arnett, Donna K and Irvin, Marguerite R and Tiwari, Hemant and Correa, Adolfo and Raffield, Laura M and Gao, Yan and de Andrade, Mariza and Rotter, Jerome I and Rich, Stephen S and Manichaikul, Ani W and Konkle, Barbara A and Johnsen, Jill M and Wheeler, Marsha M and Custer, Brian S and Duggirala, Ravindranath and Curran, Joanne E and Blangero, John and Gui, Hongsheng and Xiao, Shujie and Williams, L Keoki and Meyers, Deborah A and Li, Xingnan and Ortega, Victor and McGarvey, Stephen and Gu, C Charles and Chen, Yii-Der Ida and Lee, Wen-Jane and Shoemaker, M Benjamin and Darbar, Dawood and Roden, Dan and Albert, Christine and Kooperberg, Charles and Desai, Pinkal and Blackwell, Thomas W and Abecasis, Goncalo R and Smith, Albert V and Kang, Hyun M and Mathias, Rasika and Natarajan, Pradeep and Jaiswal, Siddhartha and Reiner, Alexander P and Bick, Alexander G} }