@article {6844, title = {Consumption of meat is associated with higher fasting glucose and insulin concentrations regardless of glucose and insulin genetic risk scores: a meta-analysis of 50,345 Caucasians.}, journal = {Am J Clin Nutr}, volume = {102}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Nov}, pages = {1266-78}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest that meat intake is associated with diabetes-related phenotypes. However, whether the associations of meat intake and glucose and insulin homeostasis are modified by genes related to glucose and insulin is unknown.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the associations of meat intake and the interaction of meat with genotype on fasting glucose and insulin concentrations in Caucasians free of diabetes mellitus.

DESIGN: Fourteen studies that are part of the Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology consortium participated in the analysis. Data were provided for up to 50,345 participants. Using linear regression within studies and a fixed-effects meta-analysis across studies, we examined 1) the associations of processed meat and unprocessed red meat intake with fasting glucose and insulin concentrations; and 2) the interactions of processed meat and unprocessed red meat with genetic risk score related to fasting glucose or insulin resistance on fasting glucose and insulin concentrations.

RESULTS: Processed meat was associated with higher fasting glucose, and unprocessed red meat was associated with both higher fasting glucose and fasting insulin concentrations after adjustment for potential confounders [not including body mass index (BMI)]. For every additional 50-g serving of processed meat per day, fasting glucose was 0.021 mmol/L (95\% CI: 0.011, 0.030 mmol/L) higher. Every additional 100-g serving of unprocessed red meat per day was associated with a 0.037-mmol/L (95\% CI: 0.023, 0.051-mmol/L) higher fasting glucose concentration and a 0.049-ln-pmol/L (95\% CI: 0.035, 0.063-ln-pmol/L) higher fasting insulin concentration. After additional adjustment for BMI, observed associations were attenuated and no longer statistically significant. The association of processed meat and fasting insulin did not reach statistical significance after correction for multiple comparisons. Observed associations were not modified by genetic loci known to influence fasting glucose or insulin resistance.

CONCLUSION: The association of higher fasting glucose and insulin concentrations with meat consumption was not modified by an index of glucose- and insulin-related single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Six of the participating studies are registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT0000513 (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities), NCT00149435 (Cardiovascular Health Study), NCT00005136 (Family Heart Study), NCT00005121 (Framingham Heart Study), NCT00083369 (Genetics of Lipid Lowering Drugs and Diet Network), and NCT00005487 (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis).

}, keywords = {Blood Glucose, Cohort Studies, Genetic Association Studies, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Hyperinsulinism, Insulin, Insulin Resistance, Insulin-Secreting Cells, Meat, Meat Products, Middle Aged, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Risk Factors}, issn = {1938-3207}, doi = {10.3945/ajcn.114.101238}, author = {Fretts, Amanda M and Follis, Jack L and Nettleton, Jennifer A and Lemaitre, Rozenn N and Ngwa, Julius S and Wojczynski, Mary K and Kalafati, Ioanna Panagiota and Varga, Tibor V and Frazier-Wood, Alexis C and Houston, Denise K and Lahti, Jari and Ericson, Ulrika and van den Hooven, Edith H and Mikkil{\"a}, Vera and Kiefte-de Jong, Jessica C and Mozaffarian, Dariush and Rice, Kenneth and Renstrom, Frida and North, Kari E and McKeown, Nicola M and Feitosa, Mary F and Kanoni, Stavroula and Smith, Caren E and Garcia, Melissa E and Tiainen, Anna-Maija and Sonestedt, Emily and Manichaikul, Ani and van Rooij, Frank J A and Dimitriou, Maria and Raitakari, Olli and Pankow, James S and Djouss{\'e}, Luc and Province, Michael A and Hu, Frank B and Lai, Chao-Qiang and Keller, Margaux F and Per{\"a}l{\"a}, Mia-Maria and Rotter, Jerome I and Hofman, Albert and Graff, Misa and K{\"a}h{\"o}nen, Mika and Mukamal, Kenneth and Johansson, Ingegerd and Ordovas, Jose M and Liu, Yongmei and M{\"a}nnist{\"o}, Satu and Uitterlinden, Andr{\'e} G and Deloukas, Panos and Sepp{\"a}l{\"a}, Ilkka and Psaty, Bruce M and Cupples, L Adrienne and Borecki, Ingrid B and Franks, Paul W and Arnett, Donna K and Nalls, Mike A and Eriksson, Johan G and Orho-Melander, Marju and Franco, Oscar H and Lehtim{\"a}ki, Terho and Dedoussis, George V and Meigs, James B and Siscovick, David S} } @article {9182, title = {Dietary Meat, Trimethylamine N-Oxide-Related Metabolites, and Incident Cardiovascular Disease Among Older Adults: The Cardiovascular Health Study.}, journal = {Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol}, volume = {42}, year = {2022}, month = {2022 09}, pages = {e273-e288}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Effects of animal source foods (ASF) on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and underlying mechanisms remain controversial. We investigated prospective associations of different ASF with incident ASCVD and potential mediation by gut microbiota-generated trimethylamine N-oxide, its L-carnitine-derived intermediates γ-butyrobetaine and crotonobetaine, and traditional ASCVD risk pathways.

METHODS: Among 3931 participants from a community-based US cohort aged 65+ years, ASF intakes and trimethylamine N-oxide-related metabolites were measured serially over time. Incident ASCVD (myocardial infarction, fatal coronary heart disease, stroke, other atherosclerotic death) was adjudicated over 12.5 years median follow-up. Cox proportional hazards models with time-varying exposures and covariates examined ASF-ASCVD associations; and additive hazard models, mediation proportions by different risk pathways.

RESULTS: After multivariable-adjustment, higher intakes of unprocessed red meat, total meat, and total ASF associated with higher ASCVD risk, with hazard ratios (95\% CI) per interquintile range of 1.15 (1.01-1.30), 1.22 (1.07-1.39), and 1.18 (1.03-1.34), respectively. Trimethylamine N-oxide-related metabolites together significantly mediated these associations, with mediation proportions (95\% CI) of 10.6\% (1.0-114.5), 7.8\% (1.0-32.7), and 9.2\% (2.2-44.5), respectively. Processed meat intake associated with a nonsignificant trend toward higher ASCVD (1.11 [0.98-1.25]); intakes of fish, poultry, and eggs were not significantly associated. Among other risk pathways, blood glucose, insulin, and C-reactive protein, but not blood pressure or blood cholesterol, each significantly mediated the total meat-ASCVD association.

CONCLUSIONS: In this large, community-based cohort, higher meat intake associated with incident ASCVD, partly mediated by microbiota-derived metabolites of L-carnitine, abundant in red meat. These novel findings support biochemical links between dietary meat, gut microbiome pathways, and ASCVD.

}, keywords = {Animals, Atherosclerosis, Cardiovascular Diseases, Carnitine, Humans, Meat, Methylamines, Risk Factors}, issn = {1524-4636}, doi = {10.1161/ATVBAHA.121.316533}, author = {Wang, Meng and Wang, Zeneng and Lee, Yujin and Lai, Heidi T M and de Oliveira Otto, Marcia C and Lemaitre, Rozenn N and Fretts, Amanda and Sotoodehnia, Nona and Budoff, Matthew and DiDonato, Joseph A and McKnight, Barbara and Tang, W H Wilson and Psaty, Bruce M and Siscovick, David S and Hazen, Stanley L and Mozaffarian, Dariush} }