@article {805, title = {Barriers to health care access among the elderly and who perceives them.}, journal = {Am J Public Health}, volume = {94}, year = {2004}, month = {2004 Oct}, pages = {1788-94}, abstract = {

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated self-perceived access to health care in a cohort of Medicare beneficiaries.

METHODS: We identified patterns of use and barriers to health care from self-administered questionnaires collected during the 1993-1994 annual examination of the Cardiovascular Health Study.

RESULTS: The questionnaires were completed by 4889 (91.1\%) participants, with a mean age of 76.0 years. The most common barriers to seeing a physician were the doctor{\textquoteright}s lack of responsiveness to patient concerns, medical bills, transportation, and street safety. Low income, no supplemental insurance, older age, and female gender were independently related to perceptions of barriers. Race was not significant after adjustment for other factors.

CONCLUSIONS: Psychological and physical barriers affect access to care among the elderly; these may be influenced by poverty more than by race.

}, keywords = {Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chi-Square Distribution, Female, Health Behavior, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Logistic Models, Male, Medicare, Patients, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States}, issn = {0090-0036}, doi = {10.2105/ajph.94.10.1788}, author = {Fitzpatrick, Annette L and Powe, Neil R and Cooper, Lawton S and Ives, Diane G and Robbins, John A} } @article {1185, title = {Long-term retention of older adults in the Cardiovascular Health Study: implications for studies of the oldest old.}, journal = {J Am Geriatr Soc}, volume = {58}, year = {2010}, month = {2010 Apr}, pages = {696-701}, abstract = {

OBJECTIVES: To describe retention according to age and visit type (clinic, home, telephone) and to determine characteristics associated with visit types for a longitudinal epidemiological study in older adults.

DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort study.

SETTING: Four U.S. clinical sites.

PARTICIPANTS: Five thousand eight hundred eighty-eight Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) participants aged 65 to 100 at 1989/90 or 1992/93 enrollment (58.6\% female; 15.7\% black). CHS participants were contacted every 6 months, with annual assessments through 1999 and in 2005/06 for the All Stars Study visit of the CHS cohort (aged 77-102; 66.5\% female; 16.6\% black).

MEASUREMENTS: All annual contacts through 1999 (n=43,772) and for the 2005/06 visit (n=1,942).

RESULTS: CHS had 43,772 total participant contacts from 1989 to 1999: 34,582 clinic visits (79.0\%), 2,238 refusals (5.1\%), 4,401 telephone visits (10.1\%), 1,811 home visits (4.1\%), and 740 other types (1.7\%). In 2005/06, the All Stars participants of the CHS cohort had 36.6\% clinic, 22.3\% home, and 41.1\% telephone visits. Compared with participants aged 65 to 69, odds ratios of not attending a CHS clinic visit were 1.82 (95\% confidence interval (CI)=1.54-2.13), 2.94 (95\% CI=2.45-3.57), 4.55 (95\% CI=3.70-5.56), and 9.09 (95\% CI=7.69-11.11) for those aged 70 to 74, 75 to 79, 80 to 84, and 85 and older, respectively, in sex-adjusted regression. In multivariable regression, participants with a 2005/06 clinic visit were younger, more likely to be male and in good health, and had had better cognitive and physical function 7 years earlier than participants with other visit types. Participants with home, telephone, and missing visits were similar on characteristics measured 7 years earlier.

CONCLUSION: Offering home, telephone, and proxy visits are essential to optimizing follow-up of aging cohorts. Home visits increased in-person retention from 36.5\% to 58.8\% and diversified the cohort with respect to age, health, and physical functioning.

}, keywords = {Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Ambulatory Care Facilities, Analysis of Variance, Cardiovascular Diseases, Chi-Square Distribution, Epidemiologic Studies, Female, Geriatric Assessment, House Calls, Humans, Logistic Models, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Multivariate Analysis, Patient Dropouts, Patient Selection, Research Subjects, Telephone, United States}, issn = {1532-5415}, doi = {10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02770.x}, author = {Strotmeyer, Elsa S and Arnold, Alice M and Boudreau, Robert M and Ives, Diane G and Cushman, Mary and Robbins, John A and Harris, Tamara B and Newman, Anne B} }