@article {790, title = {Increased left ventricular mass is a risk factor for the development of a depressed left ventricular ejection fraction within five years: the Cardiovascular Health Study.}, journal = {J Am Coll Cardiol}, volume = {43}, year = {2004}, month = {2004 Jun 16}, pages = {2207-15}, abstract = {

OBJECTIVES: Our aim in this study was to determine whether increased left ventricular mass (LVM) is a risk factor for the development of a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have shown that increased LVM is a risk factor for heart failure but not whether it is a risk factor for a low LVEF.

METHODS: As part of the Cardiovascular Health Study, a prospective population-based longitudinal study, we performed echocardiograms upon participant enrollment and again at follow-up of 4.9 +/- 0.14 years. In the present analysis, we identified 3,042 participants who had at baseline a normal LVEF and an assessment of LVM (either by electrocardiogram or echocardiogram), and at follow-up a measurable LVEF. The frequency of the development of a qualitatively depressed LVEF on two-dimensional echocardiography, corresponding approximately to an LVEF <55\%, was analyzed by quartiles of baseline LVM. Multivariable regression determined whether LVM was independently associated with the development of depressed LVEF.

RESULTS: Baseline quartile of echocardiographic LVM indexed to body surface area was associated with development of a depressed LVEF (4.8\% in quartile 1, 4.4\% in quartile 2, 7.5\% in quartile 3, and 14.1\% in quartile 4 [p < 0.001]). A similar relationship was seen in the subgroup of participants without myocardial infarction (p < 0.001). In multivariable regression that adjusted for confounders, both baseline echocardiographic (p < 0.001) and electrocardiographic (p < 0.001) LVM remained associated with development of depressed LVEF.

CONCLUSIONS: Increased LVM as assessed by electrocardiography or echocardiography is an independent risk factor for the development of depressed LVEF.

}, keywords = {Aged, Body Surface Area, Coronary Artery Disease, Diastole, Echocardiography, Electrocardiography, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Ventricles, Humans, Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Multivariate Analysis, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Sensitivity and Specificity, Statistics as Topic, Stroke Volume, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left}, issn = {0735-1097}, doi = {10.1016/j.jacc.2003.11.064}, author = {Drazner, Mark H and Rame, J Eduardo and Marino, Emily K and Gottdiener, John S and Kitzman, Dalane W and Gardin, Julius M and Manolio, Teri A and Dries, Daniel L and Siscovick, David S} } @article {6735, title = {Older Adults, "Malignant" Left Ventricular Hypertrophy, and Associated Cardiac-Specific Biomarker Phenotypes to Identify the Differential Risk of New-Onset Reduced Versus Preserved Ejection Fraction Heart Failure: CHS (Cardiovascular Health Study).}, journal = {JACC Heart Fail}, volume = {3}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Jun}, pages = {445-55}, abstract = {

OBJECTIVES: This study hypothesized that biomarkers of subclinical myocardial injury (high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T [hs-cTnT]) and hemodynamic stress (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP]) would differentiate heart~failure (HF) risk among older adults with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH).

BACKGROUND: The natural history of LVH, an important risk factor for HF, is heterogeneous.

METHODS: NT-proBNP and hs-cTnT were measured at baseline and after 2 to 3 years in older adults without prior HF or myocardial infarction in the CHS (Cardiovascular Health Study). LVH and left ventricular ejection fraction were determined by echocardiography. HF events were adjudicated over a median of 13.1 years and classified as preserved or reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (heart failure with preserved ejection fraction or heart failure with reduced ejection fraction [HFrEF]). Adjusted risk of HF by LVH and biomarker tertiles, and by LVH and longitudinal increase in each biomarker was estimated using Cox regression.

RESULTS: Prevalence of LVH was 12.5\% among 2,347 participants with complete measures. Adjusted risk of HF (N~=~643 events) was approximately 3.8-fold higher among participants with LVH and in the highest biomarker tertile, compared with those with low biomarker levels without LVH (NT-proBNP, hazard ratio [HR]: 3.78; 95\% confidence interval [CI]: 2.78 to 5.15 and hs-cTnT, HR: 3.86; 95\% CI: 2.84 to 5.26). The adjusted risk of HFrEF was 7.8 times higher among those with the highest tertile of hs-cTnT and LVH (HR: 7.83; 95\% CI: 4.43 to 13.83). Those with LVH and longitudinal increases in hs-cTnT or NT-proBNP were approximately 3-fold more likely to develop HF, primarily HFrEF, compared with those without LVH and with stable biomarkers.

CONCLUSIONS: The combination of LVH with greater hs-cTnT or NT-proBNP levels, and their longitudinal increase, identifies older adults at highest risk for symptomatic HF, especially HFrEF. These biomarkers may characterize sub-phenotypes in the transition from LVH to HF and suggest modifiable targets for prevention.

}, keywords = {Aged, Biomarkers, Echocardiography, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular, Male, Natriuretic Peptide, Brain, Peptide Fragments, Phenotype, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Troponin T}, issn = {2213-1787}, doi = {10.1016/j.jchf.2014.12.018}, author = {Seliger, Stephen L and de Lemos, James and Neeland, Ian J and Christenson, Robert and Gottdiener, John and Drazner, Mark H and Berry, Jarett and Sorkin, John and DeFilippi, Christopher} }