@article {1012, title = {Cystatin C concentration as a predictor of systolic and diastolic heart failure.}, journal = {J Card Fail}, volume = {14}, year = {2008}, month = {2008 Feb}, pages = {19-26}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Risk factors for heart failure (HF) may differ according to ejection fraction (EF). Higher cystatin C, a marker of kidney dysfunction, is associated with incident HF, but previous studies did not determine EF at diagnosis. We hypothesized that kidney dysfunction would predict diastolic HF (DHF) better than systolic HF (SHF) in the Cardiovascular Health Study.

METHODS AND RESULTS: Cystatin C was measured in 4453 participants without HF at baseline. Incident HF was categorized as DHF (EF > or = 50\%) or SHF (EF < 50\%). We compared the association of cystatin C with the risk for DHF and SHF, after adjustment for age, sex, race, medications, and HF risk factors. During 8 years of follow-up, 167 participants developed DHF and 206 participants developed SHF. After adjustment, sequentially higher quartiles of cystatin C were associated with risk for SHF (competing risks hazard ratios 1.0 [reference], 1.99 [95\% confidence interval 1.14-3.48], 2.32 [1.32-4.07], 3.17 [1.82-5.50], P for trend < .001). The risk for DHF was apparent only at the highest cystatin C quartile (hazard ratios 1.0 [reference], 1.09 [0.62-1.89], 1.08 [0.61-1.93], and 1.83 [1.07-3.11]).

CONCLUSIONS: Cystatin C levels are linearly associated with the incidence of systolic HF, whereas only the highest concentrations of cystatin C predict diastolic HF.

}, keywords = {Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Biomarkers, Cohort Studies, Confidence Intervals, Cystatin C, Cystatins, Echocardiography, Female, Heart Failure, Diastolic, Heart Failure, Systolic, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Probability, Proportional Hazards Models, Risk Assessment, Sensitivity and Specificity, Stroke Volume, Survival Analysis}, issn = {1532-8414}, doi = {10.1016/j.cardfail.2007.09.002}, author = {Moran, Andrew and Katz, Ronit and Smith, Nicolas L and Fried, Linda F and Sarnak, Mark J and Seliger, Stephen L and Psaty, Bruce and Siscovick, David S and Gottdiener, John S and Shlipak, Michael G} } @article {1330, title = {Left ventricular ejection fraction assessment in older adults: an adjunct to natriuretic peptide testing to identify risk of new-onset heart failure and cardiovascular death?}, journal = {J Am Coll Cardiol}, volume = {58}, year = {2011}, month = {2011 Sep 27}, pages = {1497-506}, abstract = {

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this paper was to determine whether assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) enhances prediction of new-onset heart failure (HF) and cardiovascular mortality over and above N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level in older adults.

BACKGROUND: Elevated NT-proBNP levels are common in older adults and are associated with increased risk of HF.

METHODS: NT-proBNP and LVEF were measured in 4,137 older adults free of HF. Repeat measures of NT-proBNP were performed 2 to 3 years later and echocardiography was repeated 5 years later (n = 2,375), with a median follow-up of 10.7 years. The addition of an abnormal (<55\%) LVEF (n = 317 [7.7\%]) to initially elevated or rising NT-proBNP levels was evaluated to determine risk of HF or cardiovascular mortality. Changes in NT-proBNP levels were also assessed for estimating the risk of conversion from a normal to abnormal LVEF.

RESULTS: For participants with a low baseline NT-proBNP level (<190 pg/ml; n = 2,918), addition of an abnormal LVEF did not improve the estimation of risk of HF and identified a moderate increase in adjusted risk for cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio: 1.69 [95\% confidence interval: 1.22 to 2.31]). Among those whose NT-proBNP subsequently increased >=25\% to >=190 pg/ml, an abnormal LVEF was likewise associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality but not HF. Participants with an initially high NT-proBNP level (>=190 pg/ml) were at greater risk overall for both outcomes, and those with an abnormal LVEF were at the highest risk. However, an abnormal LVEF did not improve model classification or risk stratification for either endpoint when added to demographic factors and change in NT-proBNP. An initially elevated NT-proBNP or rising level was associated with an increased risk of developing an abnormal LVEF.

CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of LVEF in HF-free older adults based on NT-proBNP levels should be considered on an individual basis, as such assessments do not routinely improve prognostication.

}, keywords = {Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Biomarkers, Cohort Studies, Death, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Natriuretic Peptide, Brain, Peptide Fragments, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Stroke Volume, Survival Rate, Ventricular Function, Left}, issn = {1558-3597}, doi = {10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.042}, author = {deFilippi, Christopher R and Christenson, Robert H and Kop, Willem J and Gottdiener, John S and Zhan, Min and Seliger, Stephen L} }