@article {8770, title = {Estimating Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial Participant Posttrial Survival Using Pooled Epidemiologic Cohort Data.}, journal = {J Am Heart Assoc}, volume = {10}, year = {2021}, month = {2021 May 18}, pages = {e020361}, abstract = {

Background Intensive systolic blood pressure treatment (<120~mm~Hg) in SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) improved survival compared with standard treatment (<140~mm~Hg) over a median follow-up of 3.3~years. We projected life expectancy after observed follow-up in SPRINT using SPRINT-eligible participants in the NHLBI-PCS (National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Pooled Cohorts Study). Methods and Results We used propensity scores to weight SPRINT-eligible NHLBI-PCS participants to resemble SPRINT participants. In SPRINT participants, we estimated in-trial survival (<4~years) using a time-based flexible parametric survival model. In SPRINT-eligible NHLBI-PCS participants, we estimated posttrial survival (>=4~years) using an age-based flexible parametric survival model and applied the formula to SPRINT participants to predict posttrial survival. We projected overall life expectancy for each SPRINT participant and compared it to parametric regression (eg, Gompertz) projections based on SPRINT data alone. We included 8584 SPRINT and 10~593 SPRINT-eligible NHLBI-PCS participants. After propensity weighting, mean (SD) age was 67.9 (9.4) and 68.2 (8.8) years, and 35.5\% and 37.6\% were women in SPRINT and NHLBI-PCS, respectively. Using the NHLBI-PCS-based method, projected mean life expectancy from randomization was 21.0 (7.4) years with intensive and 19.1 (7.2) years with standard treatment. Using the Gompertz regression, life expectancy was 11.2 (2.3) years with intensive and 10.5 (2.2) years with standard treatment. Conclusions Combining SPRINT and NHLBI-PCS observed data likely offers a more realistic estimate of life expectancy than parametrically extrapolating SPRINT data alone. These results offer insight into the potential long-term effectiveness of intensive SBP goals.

}, issn = {2047-9980}, doi = {10.1161/JAHA.120.020361}, author = {Bellows, Brandon K and Zhang, Yiyi and Zhang, Zugui and Lloyd-Jones, Donald M and Bress, Adam P and King, Jordan B and Kolm, Paul and Cushman, William C and Johnson, Karen C and Tamariz, Leonardo and Oelsner, Elizabeth C and Shea, Steven and Newman, Anne B and Ives, Diane G and Couper, David and Moran, Andrew E and Weintraub, William S} } @article {9099, title = {Insights From a Large-Scale Whole-Genome Sequencing Study of Systolic Blood Pressure, Diastolic Blood Pressure, and Hypertension.}, journal = {Hypertension}, year = {2022}, month = {2022 Jun 02}, pages = {101161HYPERTENSIONAHA12219324}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: The availability of whole-genome sequencing data in large studies has enabled the assessment of coding and noncoding variants across the allele frequency spectrum for their associations with blood pressure.

METHODS: We conducted a multiancestry whole-genome sequencing analysis of blood pressure among 51 456 Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine and Centers for Common Disease Genomics program participants (stage-1). Stage-2 analyses leveraged array data from UK Biobank (N=383 145), Million Veteran Program (N=318 891), and Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (N=10 643) participants, along with whole-exome sequencing data from UK Biobank (N=199 631) participants.

RESULTS: Two blood pressure signals achieved genome-wide significance in meta-analyses of stage-1 and stage-2 single variant findings (<5{\texttimes}10). Among them, a rare intergenic variant at novel locus, , was associated with lower systolic blood pressure in stage-1 (beta [SE]=-32.6 [6.0]; =4.99{\texttimes}10) but not stage-2 analysis (=0.11). Furthermore, a novel common variant at the known locus was suggestively associated with diastolic blood pressure in stage-1 (beta [SE]=-0.36 [0.07]; =4.18{\texttimes}10) and attained genome-wide significance in stage-2 (beta [SE]=-0.29 [0.03]; =7.28{\texttimes}10). Nineteen additional signals suggestively associated with blood pressure in meta-analysis of single and aggregate rare variant findings (<1{\texttimes}10 and <1{\texttimes}10, respectively).

DISCUSSION: We report one promising but unconfirmed rare variant for blood pressure and, more importantly, contribute insights for future blood pressure sequencing studies. Our findings suggest promise of aggregate analyses to complement single variant analysis strategies and the need for larger, diverse samples, and family studies to enable robust rare variant identification.

}, issn = {1524-4563}, doi = {10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.122.19324}, author = {Kelly, Tanika N and Sun, Xiao and He, Karen Y and Brown, Michael R and Taliun, Sarah A Gagliano and Hellwege, Jacklyn N and Irvin, Marguerite R and Mi, Xuenan and Brody, Jennifer A and Franceschini, Nora and Guo, Xiuqing and Hwang, Shih-Jen and de Vries, Paul S and Gao, Yan and Moscati, Arden and Nadkarni, Girish N and Yanek, Lisa R and Elfassy, Tali and Smith, Jennifer A and Chung, Ren-Hua and Beitelshees, Amber L and Patki, Amit and Aslibekyan, Stella and Blobner, Brandon M and Peralta, Juan M and Assimes, Themistocles L and Palmas, Walter R and Liu, Chunyu and Bress, Adam P and Huang, Zhijie and Becker, Lewis C and Hwa, Chii-Min and O{\textquoteright}Connell, Jeffrey R and Carlson, Jenna C and Warren, Helen R and Das, Sayantan and Giri, Ayush and Martin, Lisa W and Craig Johnson, W and Fox, Ervin R and Bottinger, Erwin P and Razavi, Alexander C and Vaidya, Dhananjay and Chuang, Lee-Ming and Chang, Yen-Pei C and Naseri, Take and Jain, Deepti and Kang, Hyun Min and Hung, Adriana M and Srinivasasainagendra, Vinodh and Snively, Beverly M and Gu, Dongfeng and Montasser, May E and Reupena, Muagututi{\textquoteright}a Sefuiva and Heavner, Benjamin D and LeFaive, Jonathon and Hixson, James E and Rice, Kenneth M and Wang, Fei Fei and Nielsen, Jonas B and Huang, Jianfeng and Khan, Alyna T and Zhou, Wei and Nierenberg, Jovia L and Laurie, Cathy C and Armstrong, Nicole D and Shi, Mengyao and Pan, Yang and Stilp, Adrienne M and Emery, Leslie and Wong, Quenna and Hawley, Nicola L and Minster, Ryan L and Curran, Joanne E and Munroe, Patricia B and Weeks, Daniel E and North, Kari E and Tracy, Russell P and Kenny, Eimear E and Shimbo, Daichi and Chakravarti, Aravinda and Rich, Stephen S and Reiner, Alex P and Blangero, John and Redline, Susan and Mitchell, Braxton D and Rao, Dabeeru C and Ida Chen, Yii-Der and Kardia, Sharon L R and Kaplan, Robert C and Mathias, Rasika A and He, Jiang and Psaty, Bruce M and Fornage, Myriam and Loos, Ruth J F and Correa, Adolfo and Boerwinkle, Eric and Rotter, Jerome I and Kooperberg, Charles and Edwards, Todd L and Abecasis, Goncalo R and Zhu, Xiaofeng and Levy, Daniel and Arnett, Donna K and Morrison, Alanna C} }