@article {9382, title = {Effect of 2022 ACC/AHA/HFSA Criteria on Stages of Heart~Failure in a Pooled Community Cohort.}, journal = {J Am Coll Cardiol}, volume = {81}, year = {2023}, month = {2023 Jun 13}, pages = {2231-2242}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: The 2022 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA)/Heart~Failure Society of America (HFSA) clinical practice guideline proposed an updated definition for heart failure (HF) stages.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare prevalence and prognosis of HF stages according to classification/definition originally described in 2013 and 2022 ACC/AHA/HFSA definitions.

METHODS: Study participants from 3 longitudinal cohorts (the MESA [Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis], CHS [Cardiovascular Health Study], and the FHS [Framingham Heart Study]), were categorized into 4 HF stages according to the 2013 and 2022 criteria. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess predictors of progression to symptomatic HF and adverse clinical outcomes associated with each HF stage.

RESULTS: Among 11,618 study participants, according to the 2022 staging, 1,943 (16.7\%) were healthy, 4,348 (37.4\%) were in stage A (at risk), 5,019 (43.2\%) were in stage B (pre-HF), and 308 (2.7\%) were in stage C/D (symptomatic HF). Compared to the classification/definition originally described in 2013, the 2022 ACC/AHA/HFSA approach resulted in a higher proportion of individuals with stage B HF (increase from 15.9\% to 43.2\%); this shift disproportionately involved women as well as Hispanic and Black individuals. Despite the 2022 criteria designating a greater proportion of individuals as stage B, the relative risk of progression to symptomatic HF remained similar (HR: 10.61; 95\%~CI: 9.00-12.51; P~< 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: New standards for HF staging resulted in a substantial shift of community-based individuals from stage A to stage B. Those with stage B HF in the new system were at high risk for progression to symptomatic HF.

}, keywords = {American Heart Association, Atherosclerosis, Cardiology, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Prognosis, United States}, issn = {1558-3597}, doi = {10.1016/j.jacc.2023.04.007}, author = {Mohebi, Reza and Wang, Dongyu and Lau, Emily S and Parekh, Juhi K and Allen, Norrina and Psaty, Bruce M and Benjamin, Emelia J and Levy, Daniel and Wang, Thomas J and Shah, Sanjiv J and Gottdiener, John S and Januzzi, James L and Ho, Jennifer E} } @article {9241, title = {Multiple Prior Live Births are Associated with Cardiac Remodeling and Heart Failure Risk in Women.}, journal = {J Card Fail}, year = {2023}, month = {2023 Jan 10}, abstract = {

INTRODUCTION: Greater parity has been associated with cardiovascular disease risk, though effects on cardiac remodeling and heart failure risk remain unclear.

METHODS: We examined the association of number of live births and echocardiographic measures of cardiac structure and function in participants of the Framingham Heart Study (FHS) using multivariable linear regression. We next examined the association of parity with incident heart failure with preserved (HFpEF) or reduced (HFrEF) ejection fraction using a Fine-Gray subdistribution hazards model in a pooled analysis of n=12,635 participants of FHS, the Cardiovascular Health Study, the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, and Prevention of Renal and Vascular Endstage Disease. Secondary analyses included major CVD, MI, and stroke.

RESULTS: Among n=3931 FHS participants (mean age 48 {\textpm} 13 years), higher number of live births was associated with worse LV fractional shortening (multivariable β -1.11 (0.31), p= 0.0005 in >= 5 live births vs nulliparous women) and worse cardiac mechanics including global circumferential strain and longitudinal and radial dyssynchrony (p< 0.01 for all comparing >= 5 live births vs nulliparity). When examining HF subtypes, women with >=5 live births were at higher risk of developing future HFrEF compared with nulliparous women (HR 1.93, 95\% CI 1.19-3.12, p=0.008); by contrast, a lower risk of HFpEF was observed (HR 0.58, 95\% CI 0.37-0.91, p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS: Greater number of live births are associated with worse cardiac structure and function. While there was no association with overall HF, a higher number of live births was associated with greater risk for incident HFrEF.

}, issn = {1532-8414}, doi = {10.1016/j.cardfail.2022.12.014}, author = {Sarma, Amy A and Paniagua, Samantha M and Lau, Emily S and Wang, Dongyu and Liu, Elizabeth E and Larson, Martin G and Hamburg, Naomi M and Mitchell, Gary F and Kizer, Jorge and Psaty, Bruce M and Allen, Norrina B and Lely, A Titia and Gansevoort, Ronald T and Rosenberg, Emily and Mukamal, Kenneth and Benjamin, Emelia J and Vasan, Ramachandran S and Cheng, Susan and Levy, Daniel and de Boer, Rudolf A and Gottdiener, John S and Shah, Sanjiv J and Ho, Jennifer E} }