@article {1055, title = {Insulin-like growth factors, their binding proteins, and prostate cancer risk: analysis of individual patient data from 12 prospective studies.}, journal = {Ann Intern Med}, volume = {149}, year = {2008}, month = {2008 Oct 07}, pages = {461-71, W83-8}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Some, but not all, published results have shown an association between circulating blood levels of some insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) and their binding proteins (IGFBPs) and the subsequent risk for prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To assess the association between levels of IGFs and IGFBPs and the subsequent risk for prostate cancer.

DATA SOURCES: Studies identified in PubMed, Web of Science, and CancerLit.

STUDY SELECTION: The principal investigators of all studies that published data on circulating concentrations of sex steroids, IGFs, or IGFBPs and prostate cancer risk using prospectively collected blood samples were invited to collaborate.

DATA EXTRACTION: Investigators provided individual participant data on circulating concentrations of IGF-I, IGF-II, IGFBP-II, and IGFBP-III and participant characteristics to a central data set in Oxford, United Kingdom.

DATA SYNTHESIS: The study included data on 3700 men with prostate cancer and 5200 control participants. On average, case patients were 61.5 years of age at blood collection and received a diagnosis of prostate cancer 5 years after blood collection. The greater the serum IGF-I concentration, the greater the subsequent risk for prostate cancer (odds ratio [OR] in the highest vs. lowest quintile, 1.38 [95\% CI, 1.19 to 1.60]; P < 0.001 for trend). Neither IGF-II nor IGFBP-II concentrations were associated with prostate cancer risk, but statistical power was limited. Insulin-like growth factor I and IGFBP-III were correlated (r = 0.58), and although IGFBP-III concentration seemed to be associated with prostate cancer risk, this was secondary to its association with IGF-I levels. Insulin-like growth factor I concentrations seemed to be more positively associated with low-grade than high-grade disease; otherwise, the association between IGFs and IGFBPs and prostate cancer risk had no statistically significant heterogeneity related to stage or grade of disease, time between blood collection and diagnosis, age and year of diagnosis, prostate-specific antigen level at recruitment, body mass index, smoking, or alcohol intake.

LIMITATIONS: Insulin-like growth factor concentrations were measured in only 1 sample for each participant, and the laboratory methods to measure IGFs differed in each study. Not all patients had disease stage or grade information, and the diagnosis of prostate cancer may differ among the studies.

CONCLUSION: High circulating IGF-I concentrations are associated with a moderately increased risk for prostate cancer.

}, keywords = {Aged, Humans, Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 2, Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 3, Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Proteins, Insulin-Like Growth Factor I, Insulin-Like Growth Factor II, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Prostatic Neoplasms, Risk Factors, Somatomedins}, issn = {1539-3704}, doi = {10.7326/0003-4819-149-7-200810070-00006}, author = {Roddam, Andrew W and Allen, Naomi E and Appleby, Paul and Key, Timothy J and Ferrucci, Luigi and Carter, H Ballentine and Metter, E Jeffrey and Chen, Chu and Weiss, Noel S and Fitzpatrick, Annette and Hsing, Ann W and Lacey, James V and Helzlsouer, Kathy and Rinaldi, Sabina and Riboli, Elio and Kaaks, Rudolf and Janssen, Joop A M J L and Wildhagen, Mark F and Schr{\"o}der, Fritz H and Platz, Elizabeth A and Pollak, Michael and Giovannucci, Edward and Schaefer, Catherine and Quesenberry, Charles P and Vogelman, Joseph H and Severi, Gianluca and English, Dallas R and Giles, Graham G and Stattin, P{\"a}r and Hallmans, G{\"o}ran and Johansson, Mattias and Chan, June M and Gann, Peter and Oliver, Steven E and Holly, Jeff M and Donovan, Jenny and Meyer, Fran{\c c}ois and Bairati, Isabelle and Galan, Pilar} } @article {1376, title = {The association between waist circumference and risk of mortality considering body mass index in 65- to 74-year-olds: a meta-analysis of 29 cohorts involving more than 58 000 elderly persons.}, journal = {Int J Epidemiol}, volume = {41}, year = {2012}, month = {2012 Jun}, pages = {805-17}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: For the elderly, the association between waist circumference (WC) and mortality considering body mass index (BMI) remains unclear, and thereby also the evidence base for using these anthropometric measures in clinical practice. This meta-analysis examined the association between WC categories and (cause-specific) mortality within BMI categories. Furthermore, the association of continuous WC with lowest and increased mortality risks was examined.

METHODS: Age- and smoking-adjusted relative risks (RRs) of mortality associated with WC-BMI categories and continuous WC (including WC and WC(2)) were calculated by the investigators and pooled by means of random-effects models.

RESULTS: During a 5-year-follow-up of 32 678 men and 25 931 women, we ascertained 3318 and 1480 deaths, respectively. A large WC (men: >=102 cm, women: >=88 cm) was associated with increased all-cause mortality RRs for those in the {\textquoteright}healthy{\textquoteright} weight {1.7 [95\% confidence interval (CI): 1.2-2.2], 1.7 (95\% CI: 1.3-2.3)}, overweight [1.1(95\% CI: 1.0-1.3), 1.4 (95\%: 1.1-1.7)] and obese [1.1 (95\% CI: 1.0-1.3), 1.6 (95\% CI: 1.3-1.9)] BMI category compared with the {\textquoteright}healthy{\textquoteright} weight (20-24.9 kg/m(2)) and a small WC (<94 cm, men; <80 cm, women) category. Underweight was associated with highest all-cause mortality RRs in men [2.2 (95\% CI: 1.8-2.8)] and women [2.3 (95\% CI: 1.8-3.1]. We found a J-shaped association for continuous WC with all-cause, cardiovascular (CVD) and cancer, and a U-shaped association with respiratory disease mortality (P < 0.05). An all-cause (CVD) mortality RR of 2.0 was associated with a WC of 132 cm (123 cm) in men and 116 cm (105 cm) in women.

CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed increased mortality risks for elderly people with an increased WC-even across BMI categories- and for those who were classified as {\textquoteright}underweight{\textquoteright} using BMI. The results provide a solid basis for re-evaluation of WC cut-points in ageing populations.

}, keywords = {Aged, Body Mass Index, Body Weight, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Humans, Male, Mortality, Neoplasms, Overweight, Respiratory Tract Diseases, Risk Assessment, Waist Circumference}, issn = {1464-3685}, doi = {10.1093/ije/dys008}, author = {de Hollander, Ellen L and Bemelmans, Wanda Je and Boshuizen, Hendriek C and Friedrich, Nele and Wallaschofski, Henri and Guallar-Castill{\'o}n, Pilar and Walter, Stefan and Zillikens, M Carola and Rosengren, Annika and Lissner, Lauren and Bassett, Julie K and Giles, Graham G and Orsini, Nicola and Heim, Noor and Visser, Marjolein and de Groot, Lisette Cpgm} } @article {8041, title = {Fatty acid biomarkers of dairy fat consumption and incidence of type 2 diabetes: A pooled analysis of prospective cohort studies.}, journal = {PLoS Med}, volume = {15}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 10}, pages = {e1002670}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate prospective associations of circulating or adipose tissue odd-chain fatty acids 15:0 and 17:0 and trans-palmitoleic acid, t16:1n-7, as potential biomarkers of dairy fat intake, with incident type 2 diabetes (T2D).

METHODS AND FINDINGS: Sixteen prospective cohorts from 12 countries (7 from the United States, 7 from Europe, 1 from Australia, 1 from Taiwan) performed new harmonised individual-level analysis for the prospective associations according to a standardised plan. In total, 63,682 participants with a broad range of baseline ages and BMIs and 15,180 incident cases of T2D over the average of 9 years of follow-up were evaluated. Study-specific results were pooled using inverse-variance-weighted meta-analysis. Prespecified interactions by age, sex, BMI, and race/ethnicity were explored in each cohort and were meta-analysed. Potential heterogeneity by cohort-specific characteristics (regions, lipid compartments used for fatty acid assays) was assessed with metaregression. After adjustment for potential confounders, including measures of adiposity (BMI, waist circumference) and lipogenesis (levels of palmitate, triglycerides), higher levels of 15:0, 17:0, and t16:1n-7 were associated with lower incidence of T2D. In the most adjusted model, the hazard ratio (95\% CI) for incident T2D per cohort-specific 10th to 90th percentile range of 15:0 was 0.80 (0.73-0.87); of 17:0, 0.65 (0.59-0.72); of t16:1n7, 0.82 (0.70-0.96); and of their sum, 0.71 (0.63-0.79). In exploratory analyses, similar associations for 15:0, 17:0, and the sum of all three fatty acids were present in both genders but stronger in women than in men (pinteraction < 0.001). Whereas studying associations with biomarkers has several advantages, as limitations, the biomarkers do not distinguish between different food sources of dairy fat (e.g., cheese, yogurt, milk), and residual confounding by unmeasured or imprecisely measured confounders may exist.

CONCLUSIONS: In a large meta-analysis that pooled the findings from 16 prospective cohort studies, higher levels of 15:0, 17:0, and t16:1n-7 were associated with a lower risk of T2D.

}, keywords = {Aged, Australia, Biomarkers, Dairy Products, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Dietary Fats, Europe, Fatty Acids, Fatty Acids, Monounsaturated, Female, Humans, Incidence, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Sex Factors, Taiwan, United States}, issn = {1549-1676}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pmed.1002670}, author = {Imamura, Fumiaki and Fretts, Amanda and Marklund, Matti and Ardisson Korat, Andres V and Yang, Wei-Sin and Lankinen, Maria and Qureshi, Waqas and Helmer, Catherine and Chen, Tzu-An and Wong, Kerry and Bassett, Julie K and Murphy, Rachel and Tintle, Nathan and Yu, Chaoyu Ian and Brouwer, Ingeborg A and Chien, Kuo-Liong and Frazier-Wood, Alexis C and Del Gobbo, Liana C and Djouss{\'e}, Luc and Geleijnse, Johanna M and Giles, Graham G and de Goede, Janette and Gudnason, Vilmundur and Harris, William S and Hodge, Allison and Hu, Frank and Koulman, Albert and Laakso, Markku and Lind, Lars and Lin, Hung-Ju and McKnight, Barbara and Rajaobelina, Kalina and Riserus, Ulf and Robinson, Jennifer G and Samieri, Cecilia and Siscovick, David S and Soedamah-Muthu, Sabita S and Sotoodehnia, Nona and Sun, Qi and Tsai, Michael Y and Uusitupa, Matti and Wagenknecht, Lynne E and Wareham, Nick J and Wu, Jason HY and Micha, Renata and Forouhi, Nita G and Lemaitre, Rozenn N and Mozaffarian, Dariush} } @article {8777, title = {Blood n-3 fatty acid levels and total and cause-specific mortality from 17 prospective studies.}, journal = {Nat Commun}, volume = {12}, year = {2021}, month = {2021 04 22}, pages = {2329}, abstract = {

The health effects of omega-3 fatty acids have been controversial. Here we report the results of a de novo pooled analysis conducted with data from 17 prospective cohort studies examining the associations between blood omega-3 fatty acid levels and risk for all-cause mortality. Over a median of 16 years of follow-up, 15,720 deaths occurred among 42,466 individuals. We found that, after multivariable adjustment for relevant risk factors, risk for death from all causes was significantly lower (by 15-18\%, at least p < 0.003) in the highest vs the lowest quintile for circulating long chain (20-22 carbon) omega-3 fatty acids (eicosapentaenoic, docosapentaenoic, and docosahexaenoic acids). Similar relationships were seen for death from cardiovascular disease, cancer and other causes. No associations were seen with the 18-carbon omega-3, alpha-linolenic acid. These findings suggest that higher circulating levels of marine n-3 PUFA are associated with a lower risk of premature death.

}, keywords = {Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cause of Death, Fatty Acids, Omega-3, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Premature, Prospective Studies, Protective Factors, Risk Factors}, issn = {2041-1723}, doi = {10.1038/s41467-021-22370-2}, author = {Harris, William S and Tintle, Nathan L and Imamura, Fumiaki and Qian, Frank and Korat, Andres V Ardisson and Marklund, Matti and Djouss{\'e}, Luc and Bassett, Julie K and Carmichael, Pierre-Hugues and Chen, Yun-Yu and Hirakawa, Yoichiro and K{\"u}pers, Leanne K and Laguzzi, Federica and Lankinen, Maria and Murphy, Rachel A and Samieri, Cecilia and Senn, Mackenzie K and Shi, Peilin and Virtanen, Jyrki K and Brouwer, Ingeborg A and Chien, Kuo-Liong and Eiriksdottir, Gudny and Forouhi, Nita G and Geleijnse, Johanna M and Giles, Graham G and Gudnason, Vilmundur and Helmer, Catherine and Hodge, Allison and Jackson, Rebecca and Khaw, Kay-Tee and Laakso, Markku and Lai, Heidi and Laurin, Danielle and Leander, Karin and Lindsay, Joan and Micha, Renata and Mursu, Jaako and Ninomiya, Toshiharu and Post, Wendy and Psaty, Bruce M and Riserus, Ulf and Robinson, Jennifer G and Shadyab, Aladdin H and Snetselaar, Linda and Sala-Vila, Aleix and Sun, Yangbo and Steffen, Lyn M and Tsai, Michael Y and Wareham, Nicholas J and Wood, Alexis C and Wu, Jason H Y and Hu, Frank and Sun, Qi and Siscovick, David S and Lemaitre, Rozenn N and Mozaffarian, Dariush} } @article {8835, title = {Genetic insights into biological mechanisms governing human ovarian ageing.}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {596}, year = {2021}, month = {2021 Aug}, pages = {393-397}, abstract = {

Reproductive longevity is essential for fertility and influences healthy ageing in women, but insights into its underlying biological mechanisms and treatments to preserve it are limited. Here we identify 290 genetic determinants of ovarian ageing, assessed using normal variation in age at natural menopause (ANM) in about 200,000 women of European ancestry. These common alleles were associated with clinical extremes of ANM; women in the top 1\% of genetic susceptibility have an equivalent risk of premature ovarian insufficiency to those carrying monogenic FMR1 premutations. The identified loci implicate a broad range of DNA damage response (DDR) processes and include loss-of-function variants in key DDR-associated genes. Integration with experimental models demonstrates that these DDR processes act across the life-course to shape the ovarian reserve and its rate of depletion. Furthermore, we demonstrate that experimental manipulation of DDR pathways highlighted by human genetics increases fertility and extends reproductive life in mice. Causal inference analyses using the identified genetic variants indicate that extending reproductive life in women improves bone health and reduces risk of type 2 diabetes, but increases the risk of hormone-sensitive cancers. These findings provide insight into the mechanisms that govern ovarian ageing, when they act, and how they might be targeted by therapeutic approaches to extend fertility and prevent disease.

}, issn = {1476-4687}, doi = {10.1038/s41586-021-03779-7}, author = {Ruth, Katherine S and Day, Felix R and Hussain, Jazib and Mart{\'\i}nez-Marchal, Ana and Aiken, Catherine E and Azad, Ajuna and Thompson, Deborah J and Knoblochova, Lucie and Abe, Hironori and Tarry-Adkins, Jane L and Gonzalez, Javier Martin and Fontanillas, Pierre and Claringbould, Annique and Bakker, Olivier B and Sulem, Patrick and Walters, Robin G and Terao, Chikashi and Turon, Sandra and Horikoshi, Momoko and Lin, Kuang and Onland-Moret, N Charlotte and Sankar, Aditya and Hertz, Emil Peter Thrane and Timshel, Pascal N and Shukla, Vallari and Borup, Rehannah and Olsen, Kristina W and Aguilera, Paula and Ferrer-Roda, M{\`o}nica and Huang, Yan and Stankovic, Stasa and Timmers, Paul R H J and Ahearn, Thomas U and Alizadeh, Behrooz Z and Naderi, Elnaz and Andrulis, Irene L and Arnold, Alice M and Aronson, Kristan J and Augustinsson, Annelie and Bandinelli, Stefania and Barbieri, Caterina M and Beaumont, Robin N and Becher, Heiko and Beckmann, Matthias W and Benonisdottir, Stefania and Bergmann, Sven and Bochud, Murielle and Boerwinkle, Eric and Bojesen, Stig E and Bolla, Manjeet K and Boomsma, Dorret I and Bowker, Nicholas and Brody, Jennifer A and Broer, Linda and Buring, Julie E and Campbell, Archie and Campbell, Harry and Castelao, Jose E and Catamo, Eulalia and Chanock, Stephen J and Chenevix-Trench, Georgia and Ciullo, Marina and Corre, Tanguy and Couch, Fergus J and Cox, Angela and Crisponi, Laura and Cross, Simon S and Cucca, Francesco and Czene, Kamila and Smith, George Davey and de Geus, Eco J C N and de Mutsert, Ren{\'e}e and De Vivo, Immaculata and Demerath, Ellen W and Dennis, Joe and Dunning, Alison M and Dwek, Miriam and Eriksson, Mikael and Esko, T{\~o}nu and Fasching, Peter A and Faul, Jessica D and Ferrucci, Luigi and Franceschini, Nora and Frayling, Timothy M and Gago-Dominguez, Manuela and Mezzavilla, Massimo and Garc{\'\i}a-Closas, Montserrat and Gieger, Christian and Giles, Graham G and Grallert, Harald and Gudbjartsson, Daniel F and Gudnason, Vilmundur and Gu{\'e}nel, Pascal and Haiman, Christopher A and H{\r a}kansson, Niclas and Hall, Per and Hayward, Caroline and He, Chunyan and He, Wei and Heiss, Gerardo and H{\o}ffding, Miya K and Hopper, John L and Hottenga, Jouke J and Hu, Frank and Hunter, David and Ikram, Mohammad A and Jackson, Rebecca D and Joaquim, Micaella D R and John, Esther M and Joshi, Peter K and Karasik, David and Kardia, Sharon L R and Kartsonaki, Christiana and Karlsson, Robert and Kitahara, Cari M and Kolcic, Ivana and Kooperberg, Charles and Kraft, Peter and Kurian, Allison W and Kutalik, Zolt{\'a}n and La Bianca, Martina and Lachance, Genevieve and Langenberg, Claudia and Launer, Lenore J and Laven, Joop S E and Lawlor, Deborah A and Le Marchand, Lo{\"\i}c and Li, Jingmei and Lindblom, Annika and Lindstr{\"o}m, Sara and Lindstrom, Tricia and Linet, Martha and Liu, Yongmei and Liu, Simin and Luan, Jian{\textquoteright}an and M{\"a}gi, Reedik and Magnusson, Patrik K E and Mangino, Massimo and Mannermaa, Arto and Marco, Brumat and Marten, Jonathan and Martin, Nicholas G and Mbarek, Hamdi and McKnight, Barbara and Medland, Sarah E and Meisinger, Christa and Meitinger, Thomas and Menni, Cristina and Metspalu, Andres and Milani, Lili and Milne, Roger L and Montgomery, Grant W and Mook-Kanamori, Dennis O and Mulas, Antonella and Mulligan, Anna M and Murray, Alison and Nalls, Mike A and Newman, Anne and Noordam, Raymond and Nutile, Teresa and Nyholt, Dale R and Olshan, Andrew F and Olsson, H{\r a}kan and Painter, Jodie N and Patel, Alpa V and Pedersen, Nancy L and Perjakova, Natalia and Peters, Annette and Peters, Ulrike and Pharoah, Paul D P and Polasek, Ozren and Porcu, Eleonora and Psaty, Bruce M and Rahman, Iffat and Rennert, Gad and Rennert, Hedy S and Ridker, Paul M and Ring, Susan M and Robino, Antonietta and Rose, Lynda M and Rosendaal, Frits R and Rossouw, Jacques and Rudan, Igor and Rueedi, Rico and Ruggiero, Daniela and Sala, Cinzia F and Saloustros, Emmanouil and Sandler, Dale P and Sanna, Serena and Sawyer, Elinor J and Sarnowski, Chloe and Schlessinger, David and Schmidt, Marjanka K and Schoemaker, Minouk J and Schraut, Katharina E and Scott, Christopher and Shekari, Saleh and Shrikhande, Amruta and Smith, Albert V and Smith, Blair H and Smith, Jennifer A and Sorice, Rossella and Southey, Melissa C and Spector, Tim D and Spinelli, John J and Stampfer, Meir and St{\"o}ckl, Doris and van Meurs, Joyce B J and Strauch, Konstantin and Styrkarsdottir, Unnur and Swerdlow, Anthony J and Tanaka, Toshiko and Teras, Lauren R and Teumer, Alexander and {\TH}orsteinsdottir, Unnur and Timpson, Nicholas J and Toniolo, Daniela and Traglia, Michela and Troester, Melissa A and Truong, Th{\'e}r{\`e}se and Tyrrell, Jessica and Uitterlinden, Andr{\'e} G and Ulivi, Sheila and Vachon, Celine M and Vitart, Veronique and V{\"o}lker, Uwe and Vollenweider, Peter and V{\"o}lzke, Henry and Wang, Qin and Wareham, Nicholas J and Weinberg, Clarice R and Weir, David R and Wilcox, Amber N and van Dijk, Ko Willems and Willemsen, Gonneke and Wilson, James F and Wolffenbuttel, Bruce H R and Wolk, Alicja and Wood, Andrew R and Zhao, Wei and Zygmunt, Marek and Chen, Zhengming and Li, Liming and Franke, Lude and Burgess, Stephen and Deelen, Patrick and Pers, Tune H and Gr{\o}ndahl, Marie Louise and Andersen, Claus Yding and Pujol, Anna and Lopez-Contreras, Andres J and Daniel, Jeremy A and Stefansson, Kari and Chang-Claude, Jenny and van der Schouw, Yvonne T and Lunetta, Kathryn L and Chasman, Daniel I and Easton, Douglas F and Visser, Jenny A and Ozanne, Susan E and Namekawa, Satoshi H and Solc, Petr and Murabito, Joanne M and Ong, Ken K and Hoffmann, Eva R and Murray, Anna and Roig, Ignasi and Perry, John R B} } @article {9587, title = {Role of Polyunsaturated Fat in Modifying Cardiovascular Risk Associated With Family History of Cardiovascular Disease: Pooled De Novo Results From 15 Observational Studies.}, journal = {Circulation}, volume = {149}, year = {2024}, month = {2024 Jan 23}, pages = {305-316}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether dietary intake of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) modifies the cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk associated with a family history of CVD. We assessed interactions between biomarkers of low PUFA intake and a family history in relation to long-term CVD risk in a large consortium.

METHODS: Blood and tissue PUFA data from 40 885 CVD-free adults were assessed. PUFA levels <=25th percentile were considered to reflect low intake of linoleic, alpha-linolenic, and eicosapentaenoic/docosahexaenoic acids (EPA/DHA). Family history was defined as having >=1 first-degree relative who experienced a CVD event. Relative risks with 95\% CI of CVD were estimated using Cox regression and meta-analyzed. Interactions were assessed by analyzing product terms and calculating relative excess risk due to interaction.

RESULTS: After multivariable adjustments, a significant interaction between low EPA/DHA and family history was observed (product term pooled RR, 1.09 [95\% CI, 1.02-1.16]; =0.01). The pooled relative risk of CVD associated with the combined exposure to low EPA/DHA, and family history was 1.41 (95\% CI, 1.30-1.54), whereas it was 1.25 (95\% CI, 1.16-1.33) for family history alone and 1.06 (95\% CI, 0.98-1.14) for EPA/DHA alone, compared with those with neither exposure. The relative excess risk due to interaction results indicated no interactions.

CONCLUSIONS: A significant interaction between biomarkers of low EPA/DHA intake, but not the other PUFA, and a family history was observed. This novel finding might suggest a need to emphasize the benefit of consuming oily fish for individuals with a family history of CVD.

}, keywords = {Animals, Biomarkers, Cardiovascular Diseases, Docosahexaenoic Acids, Fatty Acids, Omega-3, Risk Factors}, issn = {1524-4539}, doi = {10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.065530}, author = {Laguzzi, Federica and {\r A}kesson, Agneta and Marklund, Matti and Qian, Frank and Gigante, Bruna and Bartz, Traci M and Bassett, Julie K and Birukov, Anna and Campos, Hannia and Hirakawa, Yoichiro and Imamura, Fumiaki and J{\"a}ger, Susanne and Lankinen, Maria and Murphy, Rachel A and Senn, Mackenzie and Tanaka, Toshiko and Tintle, Nathan and Virtanen, Jyrki K and Yamagishi, Kazumasa and Allison, Matthew and Brouwer, Ingeborg A and de Faire, Ulf and Eiriksdottir, Gudny and Ferrucci, Luigi and Forouhi, Nita G and Geleijnse, Johanna M and Hodge, Allison M and Kimura, Hitomi and Laakso, Markku and Riserus, Ulf and van Westing, Anniek C and Bandinelli, Stefania and Baylin, Ana and Giles, Graham G and Gudnason, Vilmundur and Iso, Hiroyasu and Lemaitre, Rozenn N and Ninomiya, Toshiharu and Post, Wendy S and Psaty, Bruce M and Salonen, Jukka T and Schulze, Matthias B and Tsai, Michael Y and Uusitupa, Matti and Wareham, Nicholas J and Oh, Seung-Won and Wood, Alexis C and Harris, William S and Siscovick, David and Mozaffarian, Dariush and Leander, Karin} }