@article {1567, title = {Candidate gene association study for diabetic retinopathy in persons with type 2 diabetes: the Candidate gene Association Resource (CARe).}, journal = {Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci}, volume = {52}, year = {2011}, month = {2011 Sep 29}, pages = {7593-602}, abstract = {

PURPOSE: To investigate whether variants in cardiovascular candidate genes, some of which have been previously associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D), diabetic retinopathy (DR), and diabetic nephropathy (DN), are associated with DR in the Candidate gene Association Resource (CARe).

METHODS: Persons with T2D who were enrolled in the study (n = 2691) had fundus photography and genotyping of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 2000 candidate genes. Two case definitions were investigated: Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) grades >= 14 and >= 30. The χ{\texttwosuperior} analyses for each CARe cohort were combined by Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) pooling of odds ratios (ORs) and corrected for multiple hypothesis testing. Logistic regression was performed with adjustment for other DR risk factors. Results from replication in independent cohorts were analyzed with CMH meta-analysis methods.

RESULTS: Among 39 genes previously associated with DR, DN, or T2D, three SNPs in P-selectin (SELP) were associated with DR. The strongest association was to rs6128 (OR = 0.43, P = 0.0001, after Bonferroni correction). These associations remained significant after adjustment for DR risk factors. Among other genes examined, several variants were associated with DR with significant P values, including rs6856425 tagging α-l-iduronidase (IDUA) (P = 2.1 {\texttimes} 10(-5), after Bonferroni correction). However, replication in independent cohorts did not reveal study-wide significant effects. The P values after replication were 0.55 and 0.10 for rs6128 and rs6856425, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: Genes associated with DN, T2D, and vascular diseases do not appear to be consistently associated with DR. A few genetic variants associated with DR, particularly those in SELP and near IDUA, should be investigated in additional DR cohorts.

}, keywords = {Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetic Nephropathies, Diabetic Retinopathy, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genotype, Humans, Iduronidase, Odds Ratio, P-Selectin, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Risk Factors}, issn = {1552-5783}, doi = {10.1167/iovs.11-7510}, author = {Sobrin, Lucia and Green, Todd and Sim, Xueling and Jensen, Richard A and Tai, E Shyong and Tay, Wan Ting and Wang, Jie Jin and Mitchell, Paul and Sandholm, Niina and Liu, Yiyuan and Hietala, Kustaa and Iyengar, Sudha K and Brooks, Matthew and Buraczynska, Monika and Van Zuydam, Natalie and Smith, Albert V and Gudnason, Vilmundur and Doney, Alex S F and Morris, Andrew D and Leese, Graham P and Palmer, Colin N A and Swaroop, Anand and Taylor, Herman A and Wilson, James G and Penman, Alan and Chen, Ching J and Groop, Per-Henrik and Saw, Seang-Mei and Aung, Tin and Klein, Barbara E and Rotter, Jerome I and Siscovick, David S and Cotch, Mary Frances and Klein, Ronald and Daly, Mark J and Wong, Tien Y} } @article {6288, title = {Common variants in Mendelian kidney disease genes and their association with renal function.}, journal = {J Am Soc Nephrol}, volume = {24}, year = {2013}, month = {2013 Dec}, pages = {2105-17}, abstract = {

Many common genetic variants identified by genome-wide association studies for complex traits map to genes previously linked to rare inherited Mendelian disorders. A systematic analysis of common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes responsible for Mendelian diseases with kidney phenotypes has not been performed. We thus developed a comprehensive database of genes for Mendelian kidney conditions and evaluated the association between common genetic variants within these genes and kidney function in the general population. Using the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man database, we identified 731 unique disease entries related to specific renal search terms and confirmed a kidney phenotype in 218 of these entries, corresponding to mutations in 258 genes. We interrogated common SNPs (minor allele frequency >5\%) within these genes for association with the estimated GFR in 74,354 European-ancestry participants from the CKDGen Consortium. However, the top four candidate SNPs (rs6433115 at LRP2, rs1050700 at TSC1, rs249942 at PALB2, and rs9827843 at ROBO2) did not achieve significance in a stage 2 meta-analysis performed in 56,246 additional independent individuals, indicating that these common SNPs are not associated with estimated GFR. The effect of less common or rare variants in these genes on kidney function in the general population and disease-specific cohorts requires further research.

}, keywords = {Databases, Genetic, European Continental Ancestry Group, Gene Frequency, Genetic Variation, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Kidney, Mendelian Randomization Analysis, Phenotype, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic}, issn = {1533-3450}, doi = {10.1681/ASN.2012100983}, author = {Parsa, Afshin and Fuchsberger, Christian and K{\"o}ttgen, Anna and O{\textquoteright}Seaghdha, Conall M and Pattaro, Cristian and de Andrade, Mariza and Chasman, Daniel I and Teumer, Alexander and Endlich, Karlhans and Olden, Matthias and Chen, Ming-Huei and Tin, Adrienne and Kim, Young J and Taliun, Daniel and Li, Man and Feitosa, Mary and Gorski, Mathias and Yang, Qiong and Hundertmark, Claudia and Foster, Meredith C and Glazer, Nicole and Isaacs, Aaron and Rao, Madhumathi and Smith, Albert V and O{\textquoteright}Connell, Jeffrey R and Struchalin, Maksim and Tanaka, Toshiko and Li, Guo and Hwang, Shih-Jen and Atkinson, Elizabeth J and Lohman, Kurt and Cornelis, Marilyn C and Johansson, Asa and T{\"o}njes, Anke and Dehghan, Abbas and Couraki, Vincent and Holliday, Elizabeth G and Sorice, Rossella and Kutalik, Zolt{\'a}n and Lehtim{\"a}ki, Terho and Esko, T{\~o}nu and Deshmukh, Harshal and Ulivi, Sheila and Chu, Audrey Y and Murgia, Federico and Trompet, Stella and Imboden, Medea and Kollerits, Barbara and Pistis, Giorgio and Harris, Tamara B and Launer, Lenore J and Aspelund, Thor and Eiriksdottir, Gudny and Mitchell, Braxton D and Boerwinkle, Eric and Schmidt, Helena and Hofer, Edith and Hu, Frank and Demirkan, Ayse and Oostra, Ben A and Turner, Stephen T and Ding, Jingzhong and Andrews, Jeanette S and Freedman, Barry I and Giulianini, Franco and Koenig, Wolfgang and Illig, Thomas and D{\"o}ring, Angela and Wichmann, H-Erich and Zgaga, Lina and Zemunik, Tatijana and Boban, Mladen and Minelli, Cosetta and Wheeler, Heather E and Igl, Wilmar and Zaboli, Ghazal and Wild, Sarah H and Wright, Alan F and Campbell, Harry and Ellinghaus, David and N{\"o}thlings, Ute and Jacobs, Gunnar and Biffar, Reiner and Ernst, Florian and Homuth, Georg and Kroemer, Heyo K and Nauck, Matthias and Stracke, Sylvia and V{\"o}lker, Uwe and V{\"o}lzke, Henry and Kovacs, Peter and Stumvoll, Michael and M{\"a}gi, Reedik and Hofman, Albert and Uitterlinden, Andr{\'e} G and Rivadeneira, Fernando and Aulchenko, Yurii S and Polasek, Ozren and Hastie, Nick and Vitart, Veronique and Helmer, Catherine and Wang, Jie Jin and Stengel, B{\'e}n{\'e}dicte and Ruggiero, Daniela and Bergmann, Sven and K{\"a}h{\"o}nen, Mika and Viikari, Jorma and Nikopensius, Tiit and Province, Michael and Colhoun, Helen and Doney, Alex and Robino, Antonietta and Kr{\"a}mer, Bernhard K and Portas, Laura and Ford, Ian and Buckley, Brendan M and Adam, Martin and Thun, Gian-Andri and Paulweber, Bernhard and Haun, Margot and Sala, Cinzia and Mitchell, Paul and Ciullo, Marina and Vollenweider, Peter and Raitakari, Olli and Metspalu, Andres and Palmer, Colin and Gasparini, Paolo and Pirastu, Mario and Jukema, J Wouter and Probst-Hensch, Nicole M and Kronenberg, Florian and Toniolo, Daniela and Gudnason, Vilmundur and Shuldiner, Alan R and Coresh, Josef and Schmidt, Reinhold and Ferrucci, Luigi and van Duijn, Cornelia M and Borecki, Ingrid and Kardia, Sharon L R and Liu, Yongmei and Curhan, Gary C and Rudan, Igor and Gyllensten, Ulf and Wilson, James F and Franke, Andre and Pramstaller, Peter P and Rettig, Rainer and Prokopenko, Inga and Witteman, Jacqueline and Hayward, Caroline and Ridker, Paul M and Bochud, Murielle and Heid, Iris M and Siscovick, David S and Fox, Caroline S and Kao, W Linda and B{\"o}ger, Carsten A} } @article {7343, title = {Comparison of HapMap and 1000 Genomes Reference Panels in a Large-Scale Genome-Wide Association Study.}, journal = {PLoS One}, volume = {12}, year = {2017}, month = {2017}, pages = {e0167742}, abstract = {

An increasing number of genome-wide association (GWA) studies are now using the higher resolution 1000 Genomes Project reference panel (1000G) for imputation, with the expectation that 1000G imputation will lead to the discovery of additional associated loci when compared to HapMap imputation. In order to assess the improvement of 1000G over HapMap imputation in identifying associated loci, we compared the results of GWA studies of circulating fibrinogen based on the two reference panels. Using both HapMap and 1000G imputation we performed a meta-analysis of 22 studies comprising the same 91,953 individuals. We identified six additional signals using 1000G imputation, while 29 loci were associated using both HapMap and 1000G imputation. One locus identified using HapMap imputation was not significant using 1000G imputation. The genome-wide significance threshold of 5{\texttimes}10-8 is based on the number of independent statistical tests using HapMap imputation, and 1000G imputation may lead to further independent tests that should be corrected for. When using a stricter Bonferroni correction for the 1000G GWA study (P-value < 2.5{\texttimes}10-8), the number of loci significant only using HapMap imputation increased to 4 while the number of loci significant only using 1000G decreased to 5. In conclusion, 1000G imputation enabled the identification of 20\% more loci than HapMap imputation, although the advantage of 1000G imputation became less clear when a stricter Bonferroni correction was used. More generally, our results provide insights that are applicable to the implementation of other dense reference panels that are under development.

}, issn = {1932-6203}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0167742}, author = {de Vries, Paul S and Sabater-Lleal, Maria and Chasman, Daniel I and Trompet, Stella and Ahluwalia, Tarunveer S and Teumer, Alexander and Kleber, Marcus E and Chen, Ming-Huei and Wang, Jie Jin and Attia, John R and Marioni, Riccardo E and Steri, Maristella and Weng, Lu-Chen and Pool, Rene and Grossmann, Vera and Brody, Jennifer A and Venturini, Cristina and Tanaka, Toshiko and Rose, Lynda M and Oldmeadow, Christopher and Mazur, Johanna and Basu, Saonli and Fr{\r a}nberg, Mattias and Yang, Qiong and Ligthart, Symen and Hottenga, Jouke J and Rumley, Ann and Mulas, Antonella and de Craen, Anton J M and Grotevendt, Anne and Taylor, Kent D and Delgado, Graciela E and Kifley, Annette and Lopez, Lorna M and Berentzen, Tina L and Mangino, Massimo and Bandinelli, Stefania and Morrison, Alanna C and Hamsten, Anders and Tofler, Geoffrey and de Maat, Moniek P M and Draisma, Harmen H M and Lowe, Gordon D and Zoledziewska, Magdalena and Sattar, Naveed and Lackner, Karl J and V{\"o}lker, Uwe and McKnight, Barbara and Huang, Jie and Holliday, Elizabeth G and McEvoy, Mark A and Starr, John M and Hysi, Pirro G and Hernandez, Dena G and Guan, Weihua and Rivadeneira, Fernando and McArdle, Wendy L and Slagboom, P Eline and Zeller, Tanja and Psaty, Bruce M and Uitterlinden, Andr{\'e} G and de Geus, Eco J C and Stott, David J and Binder, Harald and Hofman, Albert and Franco, Oscar H and Rotter, Jerome I and Ferrucci, Luigi and Spector, Tim D and Deary, Ian J and M{\"a}rz, Winfried and Greinacher, Andreas and Wild, Philipp S and Cucca, Francesco and Boomsma, Dorret I and Watkins, Hugh and Tang, Weihong and Ridker, Paul M and Jukema, Jan W and Scott, Rodney J and Mitchell, Paul and Hansen, Torben and O{\textquoteright}Donnell, Christopher J and Smith, Nicholas L and Strachan, David P and Dehghan, Abbas} }