@article {1179, title = {A meta-analysis of four genome-wide association studies of survival to age 90 years or older: the Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology Consortium.}, journal = {J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci}, volume = {65}, year = {2010}, month = {2010 May}, pages = {478-87}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) may yield insights into longevity.

METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of GWAS in Caucasians from four prospective cohort studies: the Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility-Reykjavik Study, the Cardiovascular Health Study, the Framingham Heart Study, and the Rotterdam Study participating in the Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology (CHARGE) Consortium. Longevity was defined as survival to age 90 years or older (n = 1,836); the comparison group comprised cohort members who died between the ages of 55 and 80 years (n = 1,955). In a second discovery stage, additional genotyping was conducted in the Leiden Longevity Study cohort and the Danish 1905 cohort.

RESULTS: There were 273 single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) associations with p < .0001, but none reached the prespecified significance level of 5 x 10(-8). Of the most significant SNPs, 24 were independent signals, and 16 of these SNPs were successfully genotyped in the second discovery stage, with one association for rs9664222, reaching 6.77 x 10(-7) for the combined meta-analysis of CHARGE and the stage 2 cohorts. The SNP lies in a region near MINPP1 (chromosome 10), a well-conserved gene involved in regulation of cellular proliferation. The minor allele was associated with lower odds of survival past age 90 (odds ratio = 0.82). Associations of interest in a homologue of the longevity assurance gene (LASS3) and PAPPA2 were not strengthened in the second stage.

CONCLUSION: Survival studies of larger size or more extreme or specific phenotypes may support or refine these initial findings.

}, keywords = {Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alleles, Cohort Studies, Confidence Intervals, Female, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genotype, Humans, Longevity, Male, Middle Aged, Odds Ratio, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide}, issn = {1758-535X}, doi = {10.1093/gerona/glq028}, author = {Newman, Anne B and Walter, Stefan and Lunetta, Kathryn L and Garcia, Melissa E and Slagboom, P Eline and Christensen, Kaare and Arnold, Alice M and Aspelund, Thor and Aulchenko, Yurii S and Benjamin, Emelia J and Christiansen, Lene and D{\textquoteright}Agostino, Ralph B and Fitzpatrick, Annette L and Franceschini, Nora and Glazer, Nicole L and Gudnason, Vilmundur and Hofman, Albert and Kaplan, Robert and Karasik, David and Kelly-Hayes, Margaret and Kiel, Douglas P and Launer, Lenore J and Marciante, Kristin D and Massaro, Joseph M and Miljkovic, Iva and Nalls, Michael A and Hernandez, Dena and Psaty, Bruce M and Rivadeneira, Fernando and Rotter, Jerome and Seshadri, Sudha and Smith, Albert V and Taylor, Kent D and Tiemeier, Henning and Uh, Hae-Won and Uitterlinden, Andr{\'e} G and Vaupel, James W and Walston, Jeremy and Westendorp, Rudi G J and Harris, Tamara B and Lumley, Thomas and van Duijn, Cornelia M and Murabito, Joanne M} } @article {6550, title = {GWAS of longevity in CHARGE consortium confirms APOE and FOXO3 candidacy.}, journal = {J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci}, volume = {70}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Jan}, pages = {110-8}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: The genetic contribution to longevity in humans has been estimated to range from 15\% to 25\%. Only two genes, APOE and FOXO3, have shown association with longevity in multiple independent studies.

METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies including 6,036 longevity cases, age >=90 years, and 3,757 controls that died between ages 55 and 80 years. We additionally attempted to replicate earlier identified single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) associations with longevity.

RESULTS: In our meta-analysis, we found suggestive evidence for the association of SNPs near CADM2 (odds ratio [OR] = 0.81; p value = 9.66 {\texttimes} 10(-7)) and GRIK2 (odds ratio = 1.24; p value = 5.09 {\texttimes} 10(-8)) with longevity. When attempting to replicate findings earlier identified in genome-wide association studies, only the APOE locus consistently replicated. In an additional look-up of the candidate gene FOXO3, we found that an earlier identified variant shows a highly significant association with longevity when including published data with our meta-analysis (odds ratio = 1.17; p value = 1.85{\texttimes}10(-10)).

CONCLUSIONS: We did not identify new genome-wide significant associations with longevity and did not replicate earlier findings except for APOE and FOXO3. Our inability to find new associations with survival to ages >=90 years because longevity represents multiple complex traits with heterogeneous genetic underpinnings, or alternatively, that longevity may be regulated by rare variants that are not captured by standard genome-wide genotyping and imputation of common variants.

}, keywords = {Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Apolipoproteins E, Cell Adhesion Molecules, Cohort Studies, Female, Forkhead Box Protein O3, Forkhead Transcription Factors, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Longevity, Male, Middle Aged, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Receptors, Kainic Acid}, issn = {1758-535X}, doi = {10.1093/gerona/glu166}, author = {Broer, Linda and Buchman, Aron S and Deelen, Joris and Evans, Daniel S and Faul, Jessica D and Lunetta, Kathryn L and Sebastiani, Paola and Smith, Jennifer A and Smith, Albert V and Tanaka, Toshiko and Yu, Lei and Arnold, Alice M and Aspelund, Thor and Benjamin, Emelia J and De Jager, Philip L and Eirkisdottir, Gudny and Evans, Denis A and Garcia, Melissa E and Hofman, Albert and Kaplan, Robert C and Kardia, Sharon L R and Kiel, Douglas P and Oostra, Ben A and Orwoll, Eric S and Parimi, Neeta and Psaty, Bruce M and Rivadeneira, Fernando and Rotter, Jerome I and Seshadri, Sudha and Singleton, Andrew and Tiemeier, Henning and Uitterlinden, Andr{\'e} G and Zhao, Wei and Bandinelli, Stefania and Bennett, David A and Ferrucci, Luigi and Gudnason, Vilmundur and Harris, Tamara B and Karasik, David and Launer, Lenore J and Perls, Thomas T and Slagboom, P Eline and Tranah, Gregory J and Weir, David R and Newman, Anne B and van Duijn, Cornelia M and Murabito, Joanne M} } @article {8712, title = {Total carotenoid intake is associated with reduced loss of grip strength and gait speed over time in adults: The Framingham Offspring Study.}, journal = {Am J Clin Nutr}, volume = {113}, year = {2021}, month = {2021 02 02}, pages = {437-445}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Lower antioxidant serum concentrations have been linked to declines in lean mass and physical function in older adults. Yet population data on the effect of dietary antioxidants on loss of muscle strength and physical function are lacking.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the association of antioxidant intake [vitamin C, vitamin E, and total and individual carotenoids (α-carotene, β-carotene, β-cryptoxanthin, lycopene, and lutein~+~zeaxanthin)] with annualized change in grip strength and gait speed in adults from the Framingham Offspring study.

METHODS: This prospective cohort study included participants with a valid FFQ at the index examination and up to 2 prior examinations and at >=2 measures of primary outcomes: grip strength (n~=~2452) and/or gait speed (n~=~2422) measured over 3 subsequent examinations. Annualized change in grip strength (kg/y) and change in gait speed (m/s/y) over the follow-up period were used. Linear regression was used to calculate β coefficients and P values, adjusting for covariates.

RESULTS: Mean {\textpm} SD age of participants was 61 {\textpm} 9 y (range: 33-88 y). Median intakes (IQR, mg/d) of vitamin C, vitamin E, and total carotenoid across available examinations were 209.2 (133.1-394.2), 27.1 (7.4-199.0), and 15.3 (10.4-21.3), respectively. The mean follow-up time was \~{}12 {\textpm} 2 y (range: 4.5-15.4 y). In the sex-combined sample, higher intakes of total carotenoids, lycopene, and lutein~+~zeaxanthin were associated with increased annualized change in grip strength [β (SE) per 10-mg higher intake/d, range: 0.0316 (0.0146) to 0.1223 (0.0603) kg/y)]. All antioxidants except for vitamin C were associated with faster gait speed [β (SE) per 10-mg higher intake/d, range: 0.00008 (0.00004) to 0.0187 (0.0081) m/s/y].

CONCLUSIONS: Higher antioxidant intake was associated with increase in grip strength and faster gait speed in this cohort of adults. This finding highlights the need for a randomized controlled trial of dietary antioxidants and their effect on muscle strength and physical function.

}, keywords = {Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Carotenoids, Cohort Studies, Diet, Female, Hand Strength, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Walking Speed}, issn = {1938-3207}, doi = {10.1093/ajcn/nqaa288}, author = {Sahni, Shivani and Dufour, Alyssa B and Fielding, Roger A and Newman, Anne B and Kiel, Douglas P and Hannan, Marian T and Jacques, Paul F} } @article {8989, title = {What Cut-Point in Gait Speed Best Discriminates Community-Dwelling Older Adults With Mobility Complaints From Those Without? A Pooled Analysis From the Sarcopenia Definitions and Outcomes Consortium.}, journal = {J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci}, volume = {76}, year = {2021}, month = {2021 09 13}, pages = {e321-e327}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Cut-points to define slow walking speed have largely been derived from expert opinion.

METHODS: Study participants (13 589 men and 5043 women aged >=65years) had walking speed (m/s) measured over 4-6 m (mean {\textpm} SD: 1.20 {\textpm} 0.27 m/s in men and 0.94 {\textpm} 0.24 m/s in women.) Mobility limitation was defined as any self-reported difficulty with walking approximately 1/4 mile (prevalence: 12.6\% men, 26.4\% women). Sex-stratified classification and regression tree (CART) models with 10-fold cross-validation identified walking speed cut-points that optimally discriminated those who reported mobility limitation from those who did not.

RESULTS: Among 5043 women, CART analysis identified 2 cut-points, classifying 4144 (82.2\%) with walking speed >=0.75 m/s, which we labeled as "fast"; 478 (9.5\%) as "intermediate" (walking speed >=0.62 m/s but <0.75 m/s); and 421 (8.3\%) as "slow" (walking speed <0.62 m/s). Among 13 589 men, CART analysis identified 3 cut-points, classifying 10 001 (73.6\%) with walking speed >=1.00 m/s ("very fast"); 2901 (21.3\%) as "fast" (walking speed >=0.74 m/s but <1.00 m/s); 497 (3.7\%) as "intermediate" (walking speed >=0.57 m/s but <0.74 m/s); and 190 (1.4\%) as "slow" (walking speed <0.57 m/s). Prevalence of self-reported mobility limitation was lowest in the "fast" or "very fast" (11\% for men and 19\% for women) and highest in the "slow" (60.5\% in men and 71.0\% in women). Rounding the 2 slower cut-points to 0.60 m/s and 0.75 m/s reclassified very few participants.

CONCLUSIONS: Cut-points in walking speed of approximately 0.60 m/s and 0.75 m/s discriminate those with self-reported mobility limitation from those without.

}, keywords = {Aged, Female, Gait, Humans, Independent Living, Male, Mobility Limitation, Sarcopenia, Walking, Walking Speed}, issn = {1758-535X}, doi = {10.1093/gerona/glab183}, author = {Cawthon, Peggy M and Patel, Sheena M and Kritchevsky, Stephen B and Newman, Anne B and Santanasto, Adam and Kiel, Douglas P and Travison, Thomas G and Lane, Nancy and Cummings, Steven R and Orwoll, Eric S and Duchowny, Kate A and Kwok, Timothy and Hirani, Vasant and Schousboe, John and Karlsson, Magnus K and Mellstr{\"o}m, Dan and Ohlsson, Claes and Ljunggren, Osten and Xue, Qian-Li and Shardell, Michelle and Jordan, Joanne M and Pencina, Karol M and Fielding, Roger A and Magaziner, Jay and Correa-de-Araujo, Rosaly and Bhasin, Shalender and Manini, Todd M} }