@article {1183, title = {New loci associated with kidney function and chronic kidney disease.}, journal = {Nat Genet}, volume = {42}, year = {2010}, month = {2010 May}, pages = {376-84}, abstract = {

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a significant public health problem, and recent genetic studies have identified common CKD susceptibility variants. The CKDGen consortium performed a meta-analysis of genome-wide association data in 67,093 individuals of European ancestry from 20 predominantly population-based studies in order to identify new susceptibility loci for reduced renal function as estimated by serum creatinine (eGFRcrea), serum cystatin c (eGFRcys) and CKD (eGFRcrea < 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2); n = 5,807 individuals with CKD (cases)). Follow-up of the 23 new genome-wide-significant loci (P < 5 x 10(-8)) in 22,982 replication samples identified 13 new loci affecting renal function and CKD (in or near LASS2, GCKR, ALMS1, TFDP2, DAB2, SLC34A1, VEGFA, PRKAG2, PIP5K1B, ATXN2, DACH1, UBE2Q2 and SLC7A9) and 7 loci suspected to affect creatinine production and secretion (CPS1, SLC22A2, TMEM60, WDR37, SLC6A13, WDR72 and BCAS3). These results further our understanding of the biologic mechanisms of kidney function by identifying loci that potentially influence nephrogenesis, podocyte function, angiogenesis, solute transport and metabolic functions of the kidney.

}, keywords = {Cohort Studies, Creatinine, Cystatin C, Diet, Europe, Genetic Markers, Genome-Wide Association Study, Glomerular Filtration Rate, Humans, Kidney, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Models, Genetic, Risk Factors}, issn = {1546-1718}, doi = {10.1038/ng.568}, author = {K{\"o}ttgen, Anna and Pattaro, Cristian and B{\"o}ger, Carsten A and Fuchsberger, Christian and Olden, Matthias and Glazer, Nicole L and Parsa, Afshin and Gao, Xiaoyi and Yang, Qiong and Smith, Albert V and O{\textquoteright}Connell, Jeffrey R and Li, Man and Schmidt, Helena and Tanaka, Toshiko and Isaacs, Aaron and Ketkar, Shamika and Hwang, Shih-Jen and Johnson, Andrew D and Dehghan, Abbas and Teumer, Alexander and Par{\'e}, Guillaume and Atkinson, Elizabeth J and Zeller, Tanja and Lohman, Kurt and Cornelis, Marilyn C and Probst-Hensch, Nicole M and Kronenberg, Florian and T{\"o}njes, Anke and Hayward, Caroline and Aspelund, Thor and Eiriksdottir, Gudny and Launer, Lenore J and Harris, Tamara B and Rampersaud, Evadnie and Mitchell, Braxton D and Arking, Dan E and Boerwinkle, Eric and Struchalin, Maksim and Cavalieri, Margherita and Singleton, Andrew and Giallauria, Francesco and Metter, Jeffrey and de Boer, Ian H and Haritunians, Talin and Lumley, Thomas and Siscovick, David and Psaty, Bruce M and Zillikens, M Carola and Oostra, Ben A and Feitosa, Mary and Province, Michael and de Andrade, Mariza and Turner, Stephen T and Schillert, Arne and Ziegler, Andreas and Wild, Philipp S and Schnabel, Renate B and Wilde, Sandra and Munzel, Thomas F and Leak, Tennille S and Illig, Thomas and Klopp, Norman and Meisinger, Christa and Wichmann, H-Erich and Koenig, Wolfgang and Zgaga, Lina and Zemunik, Tatijana and Kolcic, Ivana and Minelli, Cosetta and Hu, Frank B and Johansson, Asa and Igl, Wilmar and Zaboli, Ghazal and Wild, Sarah H and Wright, Alan F and Campbell, Harry and Ellinghaus, David and Schreiber, Stefan and Aulchenko, Yurii S and Felix, Janine F and Rivadeneira, Fernando and Uitterlinden, Andr{\'e} G and Hofman, Albert and Imboden, Medea and Nitsch, Dorothea and Brandst{\"a}tter, Anita and Kollerits, Barbara and Kedenko, Lyudmyla and M{\"a}gi, Reedik and Stumvoll, Michael and Kovacs, Peter and Boban, Mladen and Campbell, Susan and Endlich, Karlhans and V{\"o}lzke, Henry and Kroemer, Heyo K and Nauck, Matthias and V{\"o}lker, Uwe and Polasek, Ozren and Vitart, Veronique and Badola, Sunita and Parker, Alexander N and Ridker, Paul M and Kardia, Sharon L R and Blankenberg, Stefan and Liu, Yongmei and Curhan, Gary C and Franke, Andre and Rochat, Thierry and Paulweber, Bernhard and Prokopenko, Inga and Wang, Wei and Gudnason, Vilmundur and Shuldiner, Alan R and Coresh, Josef and Schmidt, Reinhold and Ferrucci, Luigi and Shlipak, Michael G and van Duijn, Cornelia M and Borecki, Ingrid and Kr{\"a}mer, Bernhard K and Rudan, Igor and Gyllensten, Ulf and Wilson, James F and Witteman, Jacqueline C and Pramstaller, Peter P and Rettig, Rainer and Hastie, Nick and Chasman, Daniel I and Kao, W H and Heid, Iris M and Fox, Caroline S} } @article {6246, title = {Gender and telomere length: systematic review and meta-analysis.}, journal = {Exp Gerontol}, volume = {51}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Mar}, pages = {15-27}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: It is widely believed that females have longer telomeres than males, although results from studies have been contradictory.

METHODS: We carried out a systematic review and meta-analyses to test the hypothesis that in humans, females have longer telomeres than males and that this association becomes stronger with increasing age. Searches were conducted in EMBASE and MEDLINE (by November 2009) and additional datasets were obtained from study investigators. Eligible observational studies measured telomeres for both females and males of any age, had a minimum sample size of 100 and included participants not part of a diseased group. We calculated summary estimates using random-effects meta-analyses. Heterogeneity between studies was investigated using sub-group analysis and meta-regression.

RESULTS: Meta-analyses from 36 cohorts (36,230 participants) showed that on average females had longer telomeres than males (standardised difference in telomere length between females and males 0.090, 95\% CI 0.015, 0.166; age-adjusted). There was little evidence that these associations varied by age group (p=1.00) or cell type (p=0.29). However, the size of this difference did vary by measurement methods, with only Southern blot but neither real-time PCR nor Flow-FISH showing a significant difference. This difference was not associated with random measurement error.

CONCLUSIONS: Telomere length is longer in females than males, although this difference was not universally found in studies that did not use Southern blot methods. Further research on explanations for the methodological differences is required.

}, keywords = {Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sex Factors, Telomere}, issn = {1873-6815}, doi = {10.1016/j.exger.2013.12.004}, author = {Gardner, Michael and Bann, David and Wiley, Laura and Cooper, Rachel and Hardy, Rebecca and Nitsch, Dorothea and Martin-Ruiz, Carmen and Shiels, Paul and Sayer, Avan Aihie and Barbieri, Michelangela and Bekaert, Sofie and Bischoff, Claus and Brooks-Wilson, Angela and Chen, Wei and Cooper, Cyrus and Christensen, Kaare and De Meyer, Tim and Deary, Ian and Der, Geoff and Diez Roux, Ana and Fitzpatrick, Annette and Hajat, Anjum and Halaschek-Wiener, Julius and Harris, Sarah and Hunt, Steven C and Jagger, Carol and Jeon, Hyo-Sung and Kaplan, Robert and Kimura, Masayuki and Lansdorp, Peter and Li, Changyong and Maeda, Toyoki and Mangino, Massimo and Nawrot, Tim S and Nilsson, Peter and Nordfjall, Katarina and Paolisso, Giuseppe and Ren, Fu and Riabowol, Karl and Robertson, Tony and Roos, Goran and Staessen, Jan A and Spector, Tim and Tang, Nelson and Unryn, Brad and van der Harst, Pim and Woo, Jean and Xing, Chao and Yadegarfar, Mohammad E and Park, Jae Yong and Young, Neal and Kuh, Diana and von Zglinicki, Thomas and Ben-Shlomo, Yoav} }