@article {1470, title = {Clinically serious abnormalities found incidentally at MR imaging of the brain: data from the Cardiovascular Health Study.}, journal = {Radiology}, volume = {202}, year = {1997}, month = {1997 Jan}, pages = {41-6}, abstract = {

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of clinically serious findings unrelated to stroke on cranial magnetic resonance (MR) images in a population of community-dwelling elderly people.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Neuroradiologists reviewed MR images of 3,672 people aged 65 years and older who were enrolled in a longitudinal, population-based study of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. The neuroradiologists alerted MR imaging field centers about potentially serious abnormalities. Clinical information was obtained from clinical examinations performed before MR imaging, hospital discharge summaries, and the field centers at which MR imaging was performed.

RESULTS: On 3,672 image sets, 64 (1.74\%) clinically serious abnormalities were found. Among the presumptive diagnoses were 19 meningiomas (0.52\%), six pituitary adenomas (0.16\%), five cavernous malformations (0.14\%), eight vascular stenoses (0.22\%), four aneurysms (0.11\%), two intraventricular masses (0.05\%), two subdural fluid collections (0.05\%), and two other tumors (0.05\%). Only nine participants with these abnormalities required surgery. All but one of the meningiomas were in women, and the prevalence of the tumor decreased with increasing age.

CONCLUSION: Physicians should be alert to the possible presence of clinically serious conditions in otherwise asymptomatic elderly individuals.

}, keywords = {Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Brain, Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cohort Studies, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male}, issn = {0033-8419}, doi = {10.1148/radiology.202.1.8988190}, author = {Yue, N C and Longstreth, W T and Elster, A D and Jungreis, C A and O{\textquoteright}Leary, D H and Poirier, V C} } @article {1483, title = {Silent brain infarction on magnetic resonance imaging and neurological abnormalities in community-dwelling older adults. The Cardiovascular Health Study. CHS Collaborative Research Group.}, journal = {Stroke}, volume = {28}, year = {1997}, month = {1997 Jun}, pages = {1158-64}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Infarctlike lesions are frequently detected in symptomatic and asymptomatic older persons undergoing cerebral MRI, but their significance in older adults has not been examined. We determined the prevalence of MRI infarcts in a population-based sample of men and women aged > or = 65 years and related these findings to demographic, cognitive, and neurological status.

METHODS: MRI scanning was performed in 3660 Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) participants after brief neurological examinations and tests of cognitive function. MRIs were read centrally for the presence of an infarct > or = 3 mm in diameter or smaller infarctlike lesions.

RESULTS: MRI infarcts were detected in 1131 of 3647 participants with readable infarct information (31\%) and in 961 of the subgroup of 3397 participants (28\%) without known prior stroke ("silent" MRI infarcts). Smaller infarctlike lesions were found in 196 of 2516 participants who had no MRI infarcts > or = 3 mm. MRI infarcts were more common in participants who were older, had prior stroke, impaired cognition, visual field deficits, slowed repetitive finger tapping (all P < .0001), weakness on toe and heel walking, and history of memory loss, coma, or migraine headaches. Multivariate analysis in those without prior stroke showed strong associations of silent MRI infarcts with older age, history of migraines, lower digit symbol scores, and more abnormalities on neurological examination.

CONCLUSIONS: MRI evidence of brain infarction is common in older men and women without a clinical history of stroke. Their strong associations with impaired cognition and neurological deficits suggest that they are neither silent nor innocuous.

}, keywords = {Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cerebral Infarction, Cognition, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neurologic Examination}, issn = {0039-2499}, author = {Price, T R and Manolio, T A and Kronmal, R A and Kittner, S J and Yue, N C and Robbins, J and Anton-Culver, H and O{\textquoteright}Leary, D H} } @article {1469, title = {Sulcal, ventricular, and white matter changes at MR imaging in the aging brain: data from the cardiovascular health study.}, journal = {Radiology}, volume = {202}, year = {1997}, month = {1997 Jan}, pages = {33-9}, abstract = {

PURPOSE: To determine the distribution of changes in sulcal size, ventricular size, and white matter signal intensity depicted on cranial magnetic resonance (MR) images, with stratification according to age, race, and sex.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ventricular size, sulcal size, and white matter signal intensity changes were graded on cranial MR images of 3,660 community-living, elderly participants in the Cardiovascular Health Study. A healthier subgroup was also defined. Summary statistics for both groups were generated for age, race, and sex.

RESULTS: Regression models of the entire imaged cohort showed higher grades of all variables with increasing age, and higher ventricular and sulcal grades in men and in nonblack individuals. White matter grade was greater in women and in black individuals. Regression models of the healthier subgroup showed similar associations, except for a lack of association of sulcal and ventricular size with race.

CONCLUSION: Sulcal width, ventricular size, and white matter signal intensity change with age, sex, and race. Knowledge of these changes is important in appropriate interpretation of MR images of the elderly.

}, keywords = {Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Brain, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cerebral Ventricles, Cohort Studies, Continental Population Groups, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Reproducibility of Results, Sex Factors}, issn = {0033-8419}, doi = {10.1148/radiology.202.1.8988189}, author = {Yue, N C and Arnold, A M and Longstreth, W T and Elster, A D and Jungreis, C A and O{\textquoteright}Leary, D H and Poirier, V C and Bryan, R N} }