@article {1152, title = {Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology (CHARGE) Consortium: Design of prospective meta-analyses of genome-wide association studies from 5 cohorts.}, journal = {Circ Cardiovasc Genet}, volume = {2}, year = {2009}, month = {2009 Feb}, pages = {73-80}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: The primary aim of genome-wide association studies is to identify novel genetic loci associated with interindividual variation in the levels of risk factors, the degree of subclinical disease, or the risk of clinical disease. The requirement for large sample sizes and the importance of replication have served as powerful incentives for scientific collaboration. Methods- The Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology Consortium was formed to facilitate genome-wide association studies meta-analyses and replication opportunities among multiple large population-based cohort studies, which collect data in a standardized fashion and represent the preferred method for estimating disease incidence. The design of the Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology Consortium includes 5 prospective cohort studies from the United States and Europe: the Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility-Reykjavik Study, the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study, the Cardiovascular Health Study, the Framingham Heart Study, and the Rotterdam Study. With genome-wide data on a total of about 38 000 individuals, these cohort studies have a large number of health-related phenotypes measured in similar ways. For each harmonized trait, within-cohort genome-wide association study analyses are combined by meta-analysis. A prospective meta-analysis of data from all 5 cohorts, with a properly selected level of genome-wide statistical significance, is a powerful approach to finding genuine phenotypic associations with novel genetic loci.

CONCLUSIONS: The Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology Consortium and collaborating non-member studies or consortia provide an excellent framework for the identification of the genetic determinants of risk factors, subclinical-disease measures, and clinical events.

}, keywords = {Adult, Aged, Aging, Cohort Studies, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genotype, Heart Diseases, Humans, Male, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Middle Aged, Phenotype, Research Design, Risk Factors}, issn = {1942-3268}, doi = {10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.108.829747}, author = {Psaty, Bruce M and O{\textquoteright}Donnell, Christopher J and Gudnason, Vilmundur and Lunetta, Kathryn L and Folsom, Aaron R and Rotter, Jerome I and Uitterlinden, Andr{\'e} G and Harris, Tamara B and Witteman, Jacqueline C M and Boerwinkle, Eric} } @article {1087, title = {Common variants at ten loci influence QT interval duration in the QTGEN Study.}, journal = {Nat Genet}, volume = {41}, year = {2009}, month = {2009 Apr}, pages = {399-406}, abstract = {

QT interval duration, reflecting myocardial repolarization on the electrocardiogram, is a heritable risk factor for sudden cardiac death and drug-induced arrhythmias. We conducted a meta-analysis of three genome-wide association studies in 13,685 individuals of European ancestry from the Framingham Heart Study, the Rotterdam Study and the Cardiovascular Health Study, as part of the QTGEN consortium. We observed associations at P < 5 x 10(-8) with variants in NOS1AP, KCNQ1, KCNE1, KCNH2 and SCN5A, known to be involved in myocardial repolarization and mendelian long-QT syndromes. Associations were found at five newly identified loci, including 16q21 near NDRG4 and GINS3, 6q22 near PLN, 1p36 near RNF207, 16p13 near LITAF and 17q12 near LIG3 and RFFL. Collectively, the 14 independent variants at these 10 loci explain 5.4-6.5\% of the variation in QT interval. These results, together with an accompanying paper, offer insights into myocardial repolarization and suggest candidate genes that could predispose to sudden cardiac death and drug-induced arrhythmias.

}, keywords = {Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing, Adult, Aged, Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Chromosome Mapping, Death, Sudden, Cardiac, Electroencephalography, ERG1 Potassium Channel, Ether-A-Go-Go Potassium Channels, European Continental Ancestry Group, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genetic Variation, Genome, Human, Humans, KCNQ1 Potassium Channel, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Muscle Proteins, NAV1.5 Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Potassium Channels, Voltage-Gated, Risk Factors, Sodium Channels}, issn = {1546-1718}, doi = {10.1038/ng.364}, author = {Newton-Cheh, Christopher and Eijgelsheim, Mark and Rice, Kenneth M and de Bakker, Paul I W and Yin, Xiaoyan and Estrada, Karol and Bis, Joshua C and Marciante, Kristin and Rivadeneira, Fernando and Noseworthy, Peter A and Sotoodehnia, Nona and Smith, Nicholas L and Rotter, Jerome I and Kors, Jan A and Witteman, Jacqueline C M and Hofman, Albert and Heckbert, Susan R and O{\textquoteright}Donnell, Christopher J and Uitterlinden, Andr{\'e} G and Psaty, Bruce M and Lumley, Thomas and Larson, Martin G and Stricker, Bruno H Ch} } @article {1244, title = {Common variants in 22 loci are associated with QRS duration and cardiac ventricular conduction.}, journal = {Nat Genet}, volume = {42}, year = {2010}, month = {2010 Dec}, pages = {1068-76}, abstract = {

The QRS interval, from the beginning of the Q wave to the end of the S wave on an electrocardiogram, reflects ventricular depolarization and conduction time and is a risk factor for mortality, sudden death and heart failure. We performed a genome-wide association meta-analysis in 40,407 individuals of European descent from 14 studies, with further genotyping in 7,170 additional Europeans, and we identified 22 loci associated with QRS duration (P < 5 {\texttimes} 10(-8)). These loci map in or near genes in pathways with established roles in ventricular conduction such as sodium channels, transcription factors and calcium-handling proteins, but also point to previously unidentified biologic processes, such as kinase inhibitors and genes related to tumorigenesis. We demonstrate that SCN10A, a candidate gene at the most significantly associated locus in this study, is expressed in the mouse ventricular conduction system, and treatment with a selective SCN10A blocker prolongs QRS duration. These findings extend our current knowledge of ventricular depolarization and conduction.

}, keywords = {Animals, Animals, Newborn, Chromosomes, Human, Computational Biology, Electrocardiography, Genetic Loci, Genome-Wide Association Study, Heart Conduction System, Humans, Mice, Mice, Transgenic, Models, Animal, Myocytes, Cardiac, NAV1.8 Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Sodium Channels}, issn = {1546-1718}, doi = {10.1038/ng.716}, author = {Sotoodehnia, Nona and Isaacs, Aaron and de Bakker, Paul I W and D{\"o}rr, Marcus and Newton-Cheh, Christopher and Nolte, Ilja M and van der Harst, Pim and M{\"u}ller, Martina and Eijgelsheim, Mark and Alonso, Alvaro and Hicks, Andrew A and Padmanabhan, Sandosh and Hayward, Caroline and Smith, Albert Vernon and Polasek, Ozren and Giovannone, Steven and Fu, Jingyuan and Magnani, Jared W and Marciante, Kristin D and Pfeufer, Arne and Gharib, Sina A and Teumer, Alexander and Li, Man and Bis, Joshua C and Rivadeneira, Fernando and Aspelund, Thor and K{\"o}ttgen, Anna and Johnson, Toby and Rice, Kenneth and Sie, Mark P S and Wang, Ying A and Klopp, Norman and Fuchsberger, Christian and Wild, Sarah H and Mateo Leach, Irene and Estrada, Karol and V{\"o}lker, Uwe and Wright, Alan F and Asselbergs, Folkert W and Qu, Jiaxiang and Chakravarti, Aravinda and Sinner, Moritz F and Kors, Jan A and Petersmann, Astrid and Harris, Tamara B and Soliman, Elsayed Z and Munroe, Patricia B and Psaty, Bruce M and Oostra, Ben A and Cupples, L Adrienne and Perz, Siegfried and de Boer, Rudolf A and Uitterlinden, Andr{\'e} G and V{\"o}lzke, Henry and Spector, Timothy D and Liu, Fang-Yu and Boerwinkle, Eric and Dominiczak, Anna F and Rotter, Jerome I and van Herpen, G{\'e} and Levy, Daniel and Wichmann, H-Erich and van Gilst, Wiek H and Witteman, Jacqueline C M and Kroemer, Heyo K and Kao, W H Linda and Heckbert, Susan R and Meitinger, Thomas and Hofman, Albert and Campbell, Harry and Folsom, Aaron R and van Veldhuisen, Dirk J and Schwienbacher, Christine and O{\textquoteright}Donnell, Christopher J and Volpato, Claudia Beu and Caulfield, Mark J and Connell, John M and Launer, Lenore and Lu, Xiaowen and Franke, Lude and Fehrmann, Rudolf S N and te Meerman, Gerard and Groen, Harry J M and Weersma, Rinse K and van den Berg, Leonard H and Wijmenga, Cisca and Ophoff, Roel A and Navis, Gerjan and Rudan, Igor and Snieder, Harold and Wilson, James F and Pramstaller, Peter P and Siscovick, David S and Wang, Thomas J and Gudnason, Vilmundur and van Duijn, Cornelia M and Felix, Stephan B and Fishman, Glenn I and Jamshidi, Yalda and Stricker, Bruno H Ch and Samani, Nilesh J and K{\"a}{\"a}b, Stefan and Arking, Dan E} } @article {6284, title = {Common genetic loci influencing plasma homocysteine concentrations and their effect on risk of coronary artery disease.}, journal = {Am J Clin Nutr}, volume = {98}, year = {2013}, month = {2013 Sep}, pages = {668-76}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: The strong observational association between total homocysteine (tHcy) concentrations and risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) and the null associations in the homocysteine-lowering trials have prompted the need to identify genetic variants associated with homocysteine concentrations and risk of CAD.

OBJECTIVE: We tested whether common genetic polymorphisms associated with variation in tHcy are also associated with CAD.

DESIGN: We conducted a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) on tHcy concentrations in 44,147 individuals of European descent. Polymorphisms associated with tHcy (P < 10($^{-}$$^{8}$) were tested for association with CAD in 31,400 cases and 92,927 controls.

RESULTS: Common variants at 13 loci, explaining 5.9\% of the variation in tHcy, were associated with tHcy concentrations, including 6 novel loci in or near MMACHC (2.1 {\texttimes} 10$^{-}$$^{9}$), SLC17A3 (1.0 {\texttimes} 10$^{-}$$^{8}$), GTPB10 (1.7 {\texttimes} 10$^{-}$$^{8}$), CUBN (7.5 {\texttimes} 10$^{-}${\textonesuperior}$^{0}$), HNF1A (1.2 {\texttimes} 10$^{-}${\textonesuperior}{\texttwosuperior})), and FUT2 (6.6 {\texttimes} 10$^{-}$$^{9}$), and variants previously reported at or near the MTHFR, MTR, CPS1, MUT, NOX4, DPEP1, and CBS genes. Individuals within the highest 10\% of the genotype risk score (GRS) had 3-μmol/L higher mean tHcy concentrations than did those within the lowest 10\% of the GRS (P = 1 {\texttimes} 10$^{-}${\textthreesuperior}$^{6}$). The GRS was not associated with risk of CAD (OR: 1.01; 95\% CI: 0.98, 1.04; P = 0.49).

CONCLUSIONS: We identified several novel loci that influence plasma tHcy concentrations. Overall, common genetic variants that influence plasma tHcy concentrations are not associated with risk of CAD in white populations, which further refutes the causal relevance of moderately elevated tHcy concentrations and tHcy-related pathways for CAD.

}, keywords = {Coronary Artery Disease, Genes, Genetic Loci, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genotype, Homocysteine, Humans, Polymorphism, Genetic, Risk Factors}, issn = {1938-3207}, doi = {10.3945/ajcn.112.044545}, author = {van Meurs, Joyce B J and Par{\'e}, Guillaume and Schwartz, Stephen M and Hazra, Aditi and Tanaka, Toshiko and Vermeulen, Sita H and Cotlarciuc, Ioana and Yuan, Xin and M{\"a}larstig, Anders and Bandinelli, Stefania and Bis, Joshua C and Blom, Henk and Brown, Morris J and Chen, Constance and Chen, Yii-Der and Clarke, Robert J and Dehghan, Abbas and Erdmann, Jeanette and Ferrucci, Luigi and Hamsten, Anders and Hofman, Albert and Hunter, David J and Goel, Anuj and Johnson, Andrew D and Kathiresan, Sekar and Kampman, Ellen and Kiel, Douglas P and Kiemeney, Lambertus A L M and Chambers, John C and Kraft, Peter and Lindemans, Jan and McKnight, Barbara and Nelson, Christopher P and O{\textquoteright}Donnell, Christopher J and Psaty, Bruce M and Ridker, Paul M and Rivadeneira, Fernando and Rose, Lynda M and Seedorf, Udo and Siscovick, David S and Schunkert, Heribert and Selhub, Jacob and Ueland, Per M and Vollenweider, Peter and Waeber, G{\'e}rard and Waterworth, Dawn M and Watkins, Hugh and Witteman, Jacqueline C M and den Heijer, Martin and Jacques, Paul and Uitterlinden, Andr{\'e} G and Kooner, Jaspal S and Rader, Dan J and Reilly, Muredach P and Mooser, Vincent and Chasman, Daniel I and Samani, Nilesh J and Ahmadi, Kourosh R} } @article {7343, title = {Comparison of HapMap and 1000 Genomes Reference Panels in a Large-Scale Genome-Wide Association Study.}, journal = {PLoS One}, volume = {12}, year = {2017}, month = {2017}, pages = {e0167742}, abstract = {

An increasing number of genome-wide association (GWA) studies are now using the higher resolution 1000 Genomes Project reference panel (1000G) for imputation, with the expectation that 1000G imputation will lead to the discovery of additional associated loci when compared to HapMap imputation. In order to assess the improvement of 1000G over HapMap imputation in identifying associated loci, we compared the results of GWA studies of circulating fibrinogen based on the two reference panels. Using both HapMap and 1000G imputation we performed a meta-analysis of 22 studies comprising the same 91,953 individuals. We identified six additional signals using 1000G imputation, while 29 loci were associated using both HapMap and 1000G imputation. One locus identified using HapMap imputation was not significant using 1000G imputation. The genome-wide significance threshold of 5{\texttimes}10-8 is based on the number of independent statistical tests using HapMap imputation, and 1000G imputation may lead to further independent tests that should be corrected for. When using a stricter Bonferroni correction for the 1000G GWA study (P-value < 2.5{\texttimes}10-8), the number of loci significant only using HapMap imputation increased to 4 while the number of loci significant only using 1000G decreased to 5. In conclusion, 1000G imputation enabled the identification of 20\% more loci than HapMap imputation, although the advantage of 1000G imputation became less clear when a stricter Bonferroni correction was used. More generally, our results provide insights that are applicable to the implementation of other dense reference panels that are under development.

}, issn = {1932-6203}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0167742}, author = {de Vries, Paul S and Sabater-Lleal, Maria and Chasman, Daniel I and Trompet, Stella and Ahluwalia, Tarunveer S and Teumer, Alexander and Kleber, Marcus E and Chen, Ming-Huei and Wang, Jie Jin and Attia, John R and Marioni, Riccardo E and Steri, Maristella and Weng, Lu-Chen and Pool, Rene and Grossmann, Vera and Brody, Jennifer A and Venturini, Cristina and Tanaka, Toshiko and Rose, Lynda M and Oldmeadow, Christopher and Mazur, Johanna and Basu, Saonli and Fr{\r a}nberg, Mattias and Yang, Qiong and Ligthart, Symen and Hottenga, Jouke J and Rumley, Ann and Mulas, Antonella and de Craen, Anton J M and Grotevendt, Anne and Taylor, Kent D and Delgado, Graciela E and Kifley, Annette and Lopez, Lorna M and Berentzen, Tina L and Mangino, Massimo and Bandinelli, Stefania and Morrison, Alanna C and Hamsten, Anders and Tofler, Geoffrey and de Maat, Moniek P M and Draisma, Harmen H M and Lowe, Gordon D and Zoledziewska, Magdalena and Sattar, Naveed and Lackner, Karl J and V{\"o}lker, Uwe and McKnight, Barbara and Huang, Jie and Holliday, Elizabeth G and McEvoy, Mark A and Starr, John M and Hysi, Pirro G and Hernandez, Dena G and Guan, Weihua and Rivadeneira, Fernando and McArdle, Wendy L and Slagboom, P Eline and Zeller, Tanja and Psaty, Bruce M and Uitterlinden, Andr{\'e} G and de Geus, Eco J C and Stott, David J and Binder, Harald and Hofman, Albert and Franco, Oscar H and Rotter, Jerome I and Ferrucci, Luigi and Spector, Tim D and Deary, Ian J and M{\"a}rz, Winfried and Greinacher, Andreas and Wild, Philipp S and Cucca, Francesco and Boomsma, Dorret I and Watkins, Hugh and Tang, Weihong and Ridker, Paul M and Jukema, Jan W and Scott, Rodney J and Mitchell, Paul and Hansen, Torben and O{\textquoteright}Donnell, Christopher J and Smith, Nicholas L and Strachan, David P and Dehghan, Abbas} } @article {7802, title = {Common Coding Variants in Are Associated With the Nav1.8 Late Current and Cardiac Conduction.}, journal = {Circ Genom Precis Med}, volume = {11}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 May}, pages = {e001663}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Genetic variants at the / locus are strongly associated with electrocardiographic PR and QRS intervals. While is the canonical cardiac sodium channel gene, the role of in cardiac conduction is less well characterized.

METHODS: We sequenced the locus in 3699 European-ancestry individuals to identify variants associated with cardiac conduction, and replicated our findings in 21,000 individuals of European ancestry. We examined association with expression in human atrial tissue. We explored the biophysical effect of variation on channel function using cellular electrophysiology.

RESULTS: We identified 2 intronic single nucleotide polymorphisms in high linkage disequilibrium ( =0.86) with each other to be the strongest signals for PR (rs10428132, β=-4.74, =1.52{\texttimes}10) and QRS intervals (rs6599251, QRS β=-0.73; =1.2{\texttimes}10), respectively. Although these variants were not associated with or expression in human atrial tissue (n=490), they were in high linkage disequilibrium ( >=0.72) with a common missense variant, rs6795970 (V1073A). In total, we identified 7 missense variants, 4 of which (I962V, P1045T, V1073A, and L1092P) were associated with cardiac conduction. These 4 missense variants cluster in the cytoplasmic linker of the second and third domains of the SCN10A protein and together form 6 common haplotypes. Using cellular electrophysiology, we found that haplotypes associated with shorter PR intervals had a significantly larger percentage of late current compared with wild-type (I962V+V1073A+L1092P, 20.2{\textpm}3.3\%, =0.03, and I962V+V1073A, 22.4{\textpm}0.8\%, =0.0004 versus wild-type 11.7{\textpm}1.6\%), and the haplotype associated with the longest PR interval had a significantly smaller late current percentage (P1045T, 6.4{\textpm}1.2\%, =0.03).

CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest an association between genetic variation in , the late sodium current, and alterations in cardiac conduction.

}, issn = {2574-8300}, doi = {10.1161/CIRCGEN.116.001663}, author = {Macri, Vincenzo and Brody, Jennifer A and Arking, Dan E and Hucker, William J and Yin, Xiaoyan and Lin, Honghuang and Mills, Robert W and Sinner, Moritz F and Lubitz, Steven A and Liu, Ching-Ti and Morrison, Alanna C and Alonso, Alvaro and Li, Ning and Fedorov, Vadim V and Janssen, Paul M and Bis, Joshua C and Heckbert, Susan R and Dolmatova, Elena V and Lumley, Thomas and Sitlani, Colleen M and Cupples, L Adrienne and Pulit, Sara L and Newton-Cheh, Christopher and Barnard, John and Smith, Jonathan D and Van Wagoner, David R and Chung, Mina K and Vlahakes, Gus J and O{\textquoteright}Donnell, Christopher J and Rotter, Jerome I and Margulies, Kenneth B and Morley, Michael P and Cappola, Thomas P and Benjamin, Emelia J and Muzny, Donna and Gibbs, Richard A and Jackson, Rebecca D and Magnani, Jared W and Herndon, Caroline N and Rich, Stephen S and Psaty, Bruce M and Milan, David J and Boerwinkle, Eric and Mohler, Peter J and Sotoodehnia, Nona and Ellinor, Patrick T} } @article {7778, title = {A comprehensive evaluation of the genetic architecture of sudden cardiac arrest.}, journal = {Eur Heart J}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Aug 28}, abstract = {

Aims: Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) accounts for 10\% of adult mortality in Western populations. We aim to identify potential loci associated with SCA and to identify risk factors causally associated with SCA.

Methods and results: We carried out a large genome-wide association study (GWAS) for SCA (n = 3939 cases, 25~989 non-cases) to examine common variation genome-wide and in candidate arrhythmia genes. We also exploited Mendelian randomization (MR) methods using cross-trait multi-variant genetic risk score associations (GRSA) to assess causal relationships of 18 risk factors with SCA. No variants were associated with SCA at genome-wide significance, nor were common variants in candidate arrhythmia genes associated with SCA at nominal significance. Using cross-trait GRSA, we established genetic correlation between SCA and (i) coronary artery disease (CAD) and traditional CAD risk factors (blood pressure, lipids, and diabetes), (ii) height and BMI, and (iii) electrical instability traits (QT and atrial fibrillation), suggesting aetiologic roles for these traits in SCA risk.

Conclusions: Our findings show that a comprehensive approach to the genetic architecture of SCA can shed light on the determinants of a complex life-threatening condition with multiple influencing factors in the general population. The results of this genetic analysis, both positive and negative findings, have implications for evaluating the genetic architecture of patients with a family history of SCA, and for efforts to prevent SCA in high-risk populations and the general community.

}, issn = {1522-9645}, doi = {10.1093/eurheartj/ehy474}, author = {Ashar, Foram N and Mitchell, Rebecca N and Albert, Christine M and Newton-Cheh, Christopher and Brody, Jennifer A and M{\"u}ller-Nurasyid, Martina and Moes, Anna and Meitinger, Thomas and Mak, Angel and Huikuri, Heikki and Junttila, M Juhani and Goyette, Philippe and Pulit, Sara L and Pazoki, Raha and Tanck, Michael W and Blom, Marieke T and Zhao, XiaoQing and Havulinna, Aki S and Jabbari, Reza and Glinge, Charlotte and Tragante, Vinicius and Escher, Stefan A and Chakravarti, Aravinda and Ehret, Georg and Coresh, Josef and Li, Man and Prineas, Ronald J and Franco, Oscar H and Kwok, Pui-Yan and Lumley, Thomas and Dumas, Florence and McKnight, Barbara and Rotter, Jerome I and Lemaitre, Rozenn N and Heckbert, Susan R and O{\textquoteright}Donnell, Christopher J and Hwang, Shih-Jen and Tardif, Jean-Claude and VanDenburgh, Martin and Uitterlinden, Andr{\'e} G and Hofman, Albert and Stricker, Bruno H C and de Bakker, Paul I W and Franks, Paul W and Jansson, Jan-H{\r a}kan and Asselbergs, Folkert W and Halushka, Marc K and Maleszewski, Joseph J and Tfelt-Hansen, Jacob and Engstr{\o}m, Thomas and Salomaa, Veikko and Virmani, Renu and Kolodgie, Frank and Wilde, Arthur A M and Tan, Hanno L and Bezzina, Connie R and Eijgelsheim, Mark and Rioux, John D and Jouven, Xavier and K{\"a}{\"a}b, Stefan and Psaty, Bruce M and Siscovick, David S and Arking, Dan E and Sotoodehnia, Nona} } @article {9194, title = {Cross-Ancestry Investigation of Venous Thromboembolism Genomic Predictors.}, journal = {Circulation}, volume = {146}, year = {2022}, month = {2022 Oct 18}, pages = {1225-1242}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a life-threatening vascular event with environmental and genetic determinants. Recent VTE genome-wide association studies (GWAS) meta-analyses involved nearly 30 000 VTE cases and identified up to 40 genetic loci associated with VTE risk, including loci not previously suspected to play a role in hemostasis. The aim of our research was to expand discovery of new genetic loci associated with VTE by using cross-ancestry genomic resources.

METHODS: We present new cross-ancestry meta-analyzed GWAS results involving up to 81 669 VTE cases from 30 studies, with replication of novel loci in independent populations and loci characterization through in silico genomic interrogations.

RESULTS: In our genetic discovery effort that included 55 330 participants with VTE (47 822 European, 6320 African, and 1188 Hispanic ancestry), we identified 48 novel associations, of which 34 were replicated after correction for multiple testing. In our combined discovery-replication analysis (81 669 VTE participants) and ancestry-stratified meta-analyses (European, African, and Hispanic), we identified another 44 novel associations, which are new candidate VTE-associated loci requiring replication. In total, across all GWAS meta-analyses, we identified 135 independent genomic loci significantly associated with VTE risk. A genetic risk score of the significantly associated loci in Europeans identified a 6-fold increase in risk for those in the top 1\% of scores compared with those with average scores. We also identified 31 novel transcript associations in transcriptome-wide association studies and 8 novel candidate genes with protein quantitative-trait locus Mendelian randomization analyses. In silico interrogations of hemostasis and hematology traits and a large phenome-wide association analysis of the 135 GWAS loci provided insights to biological pathways contributing to VTE, with some loci contributing to VTE through well-characterized coagulation pathways and others providing new data on the role of hematology traits, particularly platelet function. Many of the replicated loci are outside of known or currently hypothesized pathways to thrombosis.

CONCLUSIONS: Our cross-ancestry GWAS meta-analyses identified new loci associated with VTE. These findings highlight new pathways to thrombosis and provide novel molecules that may be useful in the development of improved antithrombosis treatments.

}, keywords = {Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genomics, Humans, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Quantitative Trait Loci, Thrombosis, Venous Thromboembolism}, issn = {1524-4539}, doi = {10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.059675}, author = {Thibord, Florian and Klarin, Derek and Brody, Jennifer A and Chen, Ming-Huei and Levin, Michael G and Chasman, Daniel I and Goode, Ellen L and Hveem, Kristian and Teder-Laving, Maris and Martinez-Perez, Angel and A{\"\i}ssi, Dylan and Daian-Bacq, Delphine and Ito, Kaoru and Natarajan, Pradeep and Lutsey, Pamela L and Nadkarni, Girish N and de Vries, Paul S and Cuellar-Partida, Gabriel and Wolford, Brooke N and Pattee, Jack W and Kooperberg, Charles and Braekkan, Sigrid K and Li-Gao, Ruifang and Saut, No{\'e}mie and Sept, Corriene and Germain, Marine and Judy, Renae L and Wiggins, Kerri L and Ko, Darae and O{\textquoteright}Donnell, Christopher J and Taylor, Kent D and Giulianini, Franco and de Andrade, Mariza and N{\o}st, Therese H and Boland, Anne and Empana, Jean-Philippe and Koyama, Satoshi and Gilliland, Thomas and Do, Ron and Huffman, Jennifer E and Wang, Xin and Zhou, Wei and Manuel Soria, Jose and Carlos Souto, Juan and Pankratz, Nathan and Haessler, Jeffery and Hindberg, Kristian and Rosendaal, Frits R and Turman, Constance and Olaso, Robert and Kember, Rachel L and Bartz, Traci M and Lynch, Julie A and Heckbert, Susan R and Armasu, Sebastian M and Brumpton, Ben and Smadja, David M and Jouven, Xavier and Komuro, Issei and Clapham, Katharine R and Loos, Ruth J F and Willer, Cristen J and Sabater-Lleal, Maria and Pankow, James S and Reiner, Alexander P and Morelli, Vania M and Ridker, Paul M and Vlieg, Astrid van Hylckama and Deleuze, Jean-Francois and Kraft, Peter and Rader, Daniel J and Min Lee, Kyung and Psaty, Bruce M and Heidi Skogholt, Anne and Emmerich, Joseph and Suchon, Pierre and Rich, Stephen S and Vy, Ha My T and Tang, Weihong and Jackson, Rebecca D and Hansen, John-Bjarne and Morange, Pierre-Emmanuel and Kabrhel, Christopher and Tr{\'e}gou{\"e}t, David-Alexandre and Damrauer, Scott M and Johnson, Andrew D and Smith, Nicholas L} }