@article {1620, title = {Genetic analysis of a population heavy drinking phenotype identifies risk variants in whites.}, journal = {J Clin Psychopharmacol}, volume = {33}, year = {2013}, month = {2013 Apr}, pages = {206-10}, chapter = {206}, abstract = {

Genetic association studies thus far have used detailed diagnoses of alcoholism to identify loci associated with risk. This proof-of-concept analysis examined whether population data of lifetime heaviest alcohol consumption may be used to identify genetic loci that modulate risk. We conducted a genetic association study in European Americans between variants in approximately 2100 genes and alcohol consumption as part of the Candidate gene Association Resource project. We defined cases as individuals with a history of drinking 5 or more drinks per day almost every day of the week and controls as current light drinkers (1-5 drinks per week). We cross-validated identified single nucleotide polymorphisms in a meta-analysis of 2 cohorts of unrelated individuals--Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) and Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS)--and in a separate cohort of related individuals--Framingham Heart Study (FHS). The most significant variant in the meta-analysis of ARIC and CHS was rs6933598 in methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase (P = 7.46 {\texttimes} 10(-05)) with a P value in FHS of 0.042. The top variants in FHS were rs12249562 in cubulin (P = 3.03 {\texttimes} 10(-05)) and rs9839267 near cholecystokinin (P = 3.05 {\texttimes} 10(-05)) with a P value of 0.019 for rs9839267 in CHS. We have here shown feasibility in evaluating lifetime incidence of heavy alcohol drinking from population-based studies for the purpose of conducting genetic association analyses.

}, keywords = {Aged, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Case-Control Studies, European Continental Ancestry Group, Feasibility Studies, Genetic Association Studies, Genetic Loci, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genetic Variation, Humans, Incidence, Male, Middle Aged, Phenotype, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Risk}, issn = {1533-712X}, doi = {10.1097/JCP.0b013e318287009a}, author = {Hamidovic, Ajna and Goodloe, Robert J and Young, Taylor R and Styn, Mindi A and Mukamal, Kenneth J and Choquet, Helene and Kasberger, Jay L and Buxbaum, Sarah G and Papanicolaou, George J and White, Wendy and Volcik, Kelly and Spring, Bonnie and Hitsman, Brian and Levy, Daniel and Jorgenson, Eric} } @article {9114, title = {Association Between Preserved Ratio Impaired Spirometry and Clinical Outcomes in US Adults.}, journal = {JAMA}, volume = {326}, year = {2021}, month = {2021 12 14}, pages = {2287-2298}, abstract = {

Importance: Chronic lung diseases are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Unlike chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, clinical outcomes associated with proportional reductions in expiratory lung volumes without obstruction, otherwise known as preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm), are poorly understood.

Objective: To examine the prevalence, correlates, and clinical outcomes associated with PRISm in US adults.

Design, Setting, and Participants: The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Pooled Cohorts Study was a retrospective study with harmonized pooled data from 9 US general population-based cohorts (enrollment, 65 251 participants aged 18 to 102 years of whom 53 701 participants had valid baseline lung function) conducted from 1971-2011 (final follow-up, December 2018).

Exposures: Participants were categorized into mutually exclusive groups by baseline lung function. PRISm was defined as the ratio of forced expiratory volume in the first second to forced vital capacity (FEV1:FVC) greater than or equal to 0.70 and FEV1 less than 80\% predicted; obstructive spirometry FEV1:FVC ratio of less than 0.70; and normal spirometry FEV1:FVC ratio greater than or equal to 0.7 and FEV1 greater than or equal to 80\% predicted.

Main Outcomes and Measures: Main outcomes were all-cause mortality, respiratory-related mortality, coronary heart disease (CHD)-related mortality, respiratory-related events (hospitalizations and mortality), and CHD-related events (hospitalizations and mortality) classified by adjudication or validated administrative criteria. Absolute risks were adjusted for age and smoking status. Poisson and Cox proportional hazards models comparing PRISm vs normal spirometry were adjusted for age, sex, race and ethnicity, education, body mass index, smoking status, cohort, and comorbidities.

Results: Among all participants (mean [SD] age, 53.2 [15.8] years, 56.4\% women, 48.5\% never-smokers), 4582 (8.5\%) had PRISm. The presence of PRISm relative to normal spirometry was significantly associated with obesity (prevalence, 48.3\% vs 31.4\%; prevalence ratio [PR], 1.68 [95\% CI, 1.55-1.82]), underweight (prevalence, 1.4\% vs 1.0\%; PR, 2.20 [95\% CI, 1.72-2.82]), female sex (prevalence, 60.3\% vs 59.0\%; PR, 1.07 [95\% CI, 1.01-1.13]), and current smoking (prevalence, 25.2\% vs 17.5\%; PR, 1.33 [95\% CI, 1.22-1.45]). PRISm, compared with normal spirometry, was significantly associated with greater all-cause mortality (29.6/1000 person-years vs 18.0/1000 person-years; difference, 11.6/1000 person-years [95\% CI, 10.0-13.1]; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.50 [95\% CI, 1.42-1.59]), respiratory-related mortality (2.1/1000 person-years vs 1.0/1000 person-years; difference, 1.1/1000 person-years [95\% CI, 0.7-1.6]; adjusted HR, 1.95 [95\% CI, 1.54-2.48]), CHD-related mortality (5.4/1000 person-years vs 2.6/1000 person-years; difference, 2.7/1000 person-years [95\% CI, 2.1-3.4]; adjusted HR, 1.55 [95\% CI, 1.36-1.77]), respiratory-related events (12.2/1000 person-years vs 6.0/1000 person-years; difference, 6.2/1000 person-years [95\% CI, 4.9-7.5]; adjusted HR, 1.90 [95\% CI, 1.69-2.14]), and CHD-related events (11.7/1000 person-years vs 7.0/1000 person-years; difference, 4.7/1000 person-years [95\% CI, 3.7-5.8]; adjusted HR, 1.30 [95\% CI, 1.18-1.42]).

Conclusions and Relevance: In a large, population-based sample of US adults, baseline PRISm, compared with normal spirometry, was associated with a small but statistically significant increased risk for mortality and adverse cardiovascular and respiratory outcomes. Further research is needed to explore whether this association is causal.

}, keywords = {Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Forced Expiratory Volume, Humans, Lung, Lung Diseases, Male, Middle Aged, Prevalence, Retrospective Studies, Spirometry, United States, Vital Capacity}, issn = {1538-3598}, doi = {10.1001/jama.2021.20939}, author = {Wan, Emily S and Balte, Pallavi and Schwartz, Joseph E and Bhatt, Surya P and Cassano, Patricia A and Couper, David and Daviglus, Martha L and Dransfield, Mark T and Gharib, Sina A and Jacobs, David R and Kalhan, Ravi and London, Stephanie J and Navas-Acien, Ana and O{\textquoteright}Connor, George T and Sanders, Jason L and Smith, Benjamin M and White, Wendy and Yende, Sachin and Oelsner, Elizabeth C} }