@article {5861, title = {Lifetime risk and years lived free of total cardiovascular disease.}, journal = {JAMA}, volume = {308}, year = {2012}, month = {2012 Nov 07}, pages = {1795-801}, abstract = {

CONTEXT: Estimates of lifetime risk for total cardiovascular disease (CVD) may provide projections of the future population burden of CVD and may assist in clinician-patient risk communication. To date, no lifetime risk estimates of total CVD have been reported.

OBJECTIVES: To calculate lifetime risk estimates of total CVD by index age (45, 55, 65, 75 years) and risk factor strata and to estimate years lived free of CVD across risk factor strata.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Pooled survival analysis of as many as 905,115 person-years of data from 1964 through 2008 from 5 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-funded community-based cohorts: Framingham Heart Study, Framingham Offspring Study, Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study, Chicago Heart Association Detection Project in Industry Study, and Cardiovascular Health Study. All participants were free of CVD at baseline with risk factor data (blood pressure [BP], total cholesterol [TC], diabetes, and smoking status) and total CVD outcome data.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Any total CVD event (including fatal and nonfatal coronary heart disease, all forms of stroke, congestive heart failure, and other CVD deaths).

RESULTS: At an index age of 45 years, overall lifetime risk for total CVD was 60.3\% (95\% CI, 59.3\%-61.2\%) for men and 55.6\% (95\% CI, 54.5\%-56.7\%) for women. Men had higher lifetime risk estimates than women across all index ages. At index ages 55 and 65 years, men and women with at least 1 elevated risk factor (BP, 140-149/90-99 mm Hg; or TC, 200-239 mg/dL; but no diabetes or smoking), 1 major risk factor, or at least 2 major risk factors (BP, >=160/100 mm Hg or receiving treatment; TC, >=240 mg/dL or receiving treatment; diabetes mellitus; or current smoking) had lifetime risk estimates to age 95 years that exceeded 50\%. Despite an optimal risk factor profile (BP, <120/80 mm Hg; TC, <180 mg/dL; and no smoking or diabetes), men and women at the index age of 55 years had lifetime risks (through 85 years of age) for total CVD of greater than 40\% and 30\%, respectively. Compared with participants with at least 2 major risk factors, those with an optimal risk factor profile lived up to 14 years longer free of total CVD.

CONCLUSIONS: Lifetime risk estimates for total CVD were high (>30\%) for all individuals, even those with optimal risk factors in middle age. However, maintenance of optimal risk factor levels in middle age was associated with substantially longer morbidity-free survival.

}, keywords = {Adult, Aged, Blood Pressure, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cohort Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Forecasting, Humans, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Male, Middle Aged, Morbidity, Risk, Risk Factors, Smoking}, issn = {1538-3598}, doi = {10.1001/jama.2012.14312}, author = {Wilkins, John T and Ning, Hongyan and Berry, Jarett and Zhao, Lihui and Dyer, Alan R and Lloyd-Jones, Donald M} } @article {6366, title = {Coronary heart disease risks associated with high levels of HDL cholesterol.}, journal = {J Am Heart Assoc}, volume = {3}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Mar 13}, pages = {e000519}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: The association between high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and coronary heart disease (CHD) events is not well described in individuals with very high levels of HDL-C (>80 mg/dL).

METHODS AND RESULTS: Using pooled data from 6 community-based cohorts we examined CHD and total mortality risks across a broad range of HDL-C, including values in excess of 80 mg/dL. We used Cox proportional hazards models with penalized splines to assess multivariable, adjusted, sex-stratified associations of HDL-C with the hazard for CHD events and total mortality, using HDL-C 45 mg/dL and 55 mg/dL as the referent in men and women, respectively. Analyses included 11 515 men and 12 925 women yielding 307 245 person-years of follow-up. In men, the association between HDL-C and CHD events was inverse and linear across most HDL-C values; however at HDL-C values >90 mg/dL there was a plateau effect in the pattern of association. In women, the association between HDL-C and CHD events was inverse and linear across lower values of HDL-C, however at HDL-C values >75 mg/dL there were no further reductions in the hazard ratio point estimates for CHD. In unadjusted models there were increased total mortality risks in men with very high HDL-C, however mortality risks observed in participants with very high HDL-C were attenuated after adjustment for traditional risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS: We did not observe further reductions in CHD risk with HDL-C values higher than 90 mg/dL in men and 75 mg/dL in women.

}, keywords = {Aged, Biomarkers, Cholesterol, HDL, Coronary Disease, Female, Humans, Linear Models, Male, Middle Aged, Multivariate Analysis, Prognosis, Proportional Hazards Models, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, Time Factors, United States, Up-Regulation}, issn = {2047-9980}, doi = {10.1161/JAHA.113.000519}, author = {Wilkins, John T and Ning, Hongyan and Stone, Neil J and Criqui, Michael H and Zhao, Lihui and Greenland, Philip and Lloyd-Jones, Donald M} }