@article {1195, title = {Prevalence of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis in the general population: an individual participant data meta-analysis.}, journal = {Stroke}, volume = {41}, year = {2010}, month = {2010 Jun}, pages = {1294-7}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In the discussion on the cost-effectiveness of screening, precise estimates of severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis are vital. Accordingly, we assessed the prevalence of moderate and severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis by age and sex using pooled cohort data.

METHODS: We performed an individual participant data meta-analysis (23 706 participants) of 4 population-based studies (Malm{\"o} Diet and Cancer Study, Troms{\o}, Carotid Atherosclerosis Progression Study, and Cardiovascular Health Study). Outcomes of interest were asymptomatic moderate (> or =50\%) and severe carotid stenosis (> or =70\%).

RESULTS: Prevalence of moderate asymptomatic carotid stenosis ranged from 0.2\% (95\% CI, 0.0\% to 0.4\%) in men aged <50 years to 7.5\% (5.2\% to 10.5\%) in men aged > or =80 years. For women, this prevalence increased from 0\% (0\% to 0.2\%) to 5.0\% (3.1\% to 7.5\%). Prevalence of severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis ranged from 0.1\% (0.0\% to 0.3\%) in men aged <50 years to 3.1\% (1.7\% to 5.3\%) in men aged > or =80. For women, this prevalence increased from 0\% (0.0\% to 0.2\%) to 0.9\% (0.3\% to 2.4\%).

CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis in the general population ranges from 0\% to 3.1\%, which is useful information in the discussion on the cost-effectiveness of screening.

}, keywords = {Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Carotid Stenosis, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Prevalence, Severity of Illness Index, Sex Factors}, issn = {1524-4628}, doi = {10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.581058}, author = {de Weerd, Marjolein and Greving, Jacoba P and Hedblad, Bo and Lorenz, Matthias W and Mathiesen, Ellisiv B and O{\textquoteright}Leary, Daniel H and Rosvall, Maria and Sitzer, Matthias and Buskens, Erik and Bots, Michiel L} } @article {1325, title = {Genetic variants in novel pathways influence blood pressure and cardiovascular disease risk.}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {478}, year = {2011}, month = {2011 Sep 11}, pages = {103-9}, abstract = {

Blood pressure is a heritable trait influenced by several biological pathways and responsive to environmental stimuli. Over one billion people worldwide have hypertension (>=140 mm Hg systolic blood pressure or >=90 mm Hg diastolic blood pressure). Even small increments in blood pressure are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. This genome-wide association study of systolic and diastolic blood pressure, which used a multi-stage design in 200,000 individuals of European descent, identified sixteen novel loci: six of these loci contain genes previously known or suspected to regulate blood pressure (GUCY1A3-GUCY1B3, NPR3-C5orf23, ADM, FURIN-FES, GOSR2, GNAS-EDN3); the other ten provide new clues to blood pressure physiology. A genetic risk score based on 29 genome-wide significant variants was associated with hypertension, left ventricular wall thickness, stroke and coronary artery disease, but not kidney disease or kidney function. We also observed associations with blood pressure in East Asian, South Asian and African ancestry individuals. Our findings provide new insights into the genetics and biology of blood pressure, and suggest potential novel therapeutic pathways for cardiovascular disease prevention.

}, keywords = {Africa, Asia, Blood Pressure, Cardiovascular Diseases, Coronary Artery Disease, Europe, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Hypertension, Kidney Diseases, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Stroke}, issn = {1476-4687}, doi = {10.1038/nature10405}, author = {Ehret, Georg B and Munroe, Patricia B and Rice, Kenneth M and Bochud, Murielle and Johnson, Andrew D and Chasman, Daniel I and Smith, Albert V and Tobin, Martin D and Verwoert, Germaine C and Hwang, Shih-Jen and Pihur, Vasyl and Vollenweider, Peter and O{\textquoteright}Reilly, Paul F and Amin, Najaf and Bragg-Gresham, Jennifer L and Teumer, Alexander and Glazer, Nicole L and Launer, Lenore and Zhao, Jing Hua and Aulchenko, Yurii and Heath, Simon and S{\~o}ber, Siim and Parsa, Afshin and Luan, Jian{\textquoteright}an and Arora, Pankaj and Dehghan, Abbas and Zhang, Feng and Lucas, Gavin and Hicks, Andrew A and Jackson, Anne U and Peden, John F and Tanaka, Toshiko and Wild, Sarah H and Rudan, Igor and Igl, Wilmar and Milaneschi, Yuri and Parker, Alex N and Fava, Cristiano and Chambers, John C and Fox, Ervin R and Kumari, Meena and Go, Min Jin and van der Harst, Pim and Kao, Wen Hong Linda and Sj{\"o}gren, Marketa and Vinay, D G and Alexander, Myriam and Tabara, Yasuharu and Shaw-Hawkins, Sue and Whincup, Peter H and Liu, Yongmei and Shi, Gang and Kuusisto, Johanna and Tayo, Bamidele and Seielstad, Mark and Sim, Xueling and Nguyen, Khanh-Dung Hoang and Lehtim{\"a}ki, Terho and Matullo, Giuseppe and Wu, Ying and Gaunt, Tom R and Onland-Moret, N Charlotte and Cooper, Matthew N and Platou, Carl G P and Org, Elin and Hardy, Rebecca and Dahgam, Santosh and Palmen, Jutta and Vitart, Veronique and Braund, Peter S and Kuznetsova, Tatiana and Uiterwaal, Cuno S P M and Adeyemo, Adebowale and Palmas, Walter and Campbell, Harry and Ludwig, Barbara and Tomaszewski, Maciej and Tzoulaki, Ioanna and Palmer, Nicholette D and Aspelund, Thor and Garcia, Melissa and Chang, Yen-Pei C and O{\textquoteright}Connell, Jeffrey R and Steinle, Nanette I and Grobbee, Diederick E and Arking, Dan E and Kardia, Sharon L and Morrison, Alanna C and Hernandez, Dena and Najjar, Samer and McArdle, Wendy L and Hadley, David and Brown, Morris J and Connell, John M and Hingorani, Aroon D and Day, Ian N M and Lawlor, Debbie A and Beilby, John P and Lawrence, Robert W and Clarke, Robert and Hopewell, Jemma C and Ongen, Halit and Dreisbach, Albert W and Li, Yali and Young, J Hunter and Bis, Joshua C and K{\"a}h{\"o}nen, Mika and Viikari, Jorma and Adair, Linda S and Lee, Nanette R and Chen, Ming-Huei and Olden, Matthias and Pattaro, Cristian and Bolton, Judith A Hoffman and K{\"o}ttgen, Anna and Bergmann, Sven and Mooser, Vincent and Chaturvedi, Nish and Frayling, Timothy M and Islam, Muhammad and Jafar, Tazeen H and Erdmann, Jeanette and Kulkarni, Smita R and Bornstein, Stefan R and Gr{\"a}ssler, J{\"u}rgen and Groop, Leif and Voight, Benjamin F and Kettunen, Johannes and Howard, Philip and Taylor, Andrew and Guarrera, Simonetta and Ricceri, Fulvio and Emilsson, Valur and Plump, Andrew and Barroso, In{\^e}s and Khaw, Kay-Tee and Weder, Alan B and Hunt, Steven C and Sun, Yan V and Bergman, Richard N and Collins, Francis S and Bonnycastle, Lori L and Scott, Laura J and Stringham, Heather M and Peltonen, Leena and Perola, Markus and Vartiainen, Erkki and Brand, Stefan-Martin and Staessen, Jan A and Wang, Thomas J and Burton, Paul R and Soler Artigas, Maria and Dong, Yanbin and Snieder, Harold and Wang, Xiaoling and Zhu, Haidong and Lohman, Kurt K and Rudock, Megan E and Heckbert, Susan R and Smith, Nicholas L and Wiggins, Kerri L and Doumatey, Ayo and Shriner, Daniel and Veldre, Gudrun and Viigimaa, Margus and Kinra, Sanjay and Prabhakaran, Dorairaj and Tripathy, Vikal and Langefeld, Carl D and Rosengren, Annika and Thelle, Dag S and Corsi, Anna Maria and Singleton, Andrew and Forrester, Terrence and Hilton, Gina and McKenzie, Colin A and Salako, Tunde and Iwai, Naoharu and Kita, Yoshikuni and Ogihara, Toshio and Ohkubo, Takayoshi and Okamura, Tomonori and Ueshima, Hirotsugu and Umemura, Satoshi and Eyheramendy, Susana and Meitinger, Thomas and Wichmann, H-Erich and Cho, Yoon Shin and Kim, Hyung-Lae and Lee, Jong-Young and Scott, James and Sehmi, Joban S and Zhang, Weihua and Hedblad, Bo and Nilsson, Peter and Smith, George Davey and Wong, Andrew and Narisu, Narisu and Stan{\v c}{\'a}kov{\'a}, Alena and Raffel, Leslie J and Yao, Jie and Kathiresan, Sekar and O{\textquoteright}Donnell, Christopher J and Schwartz, Stephen M and Ikram, M Arfan and Longstreth, W T and Mosley, Thomas H and Seshadri, Sudha and Shrine, Nick R G and Wain, Louise V and Morken, Mario A and Swift, Amy J and Laitinen, Jaana and Prokopenko, Inga and Zitting, Paavo and Cooper, Jackie A and Humphries, Steve E and Danesh, John and Rasheed, Asif and Goel, Anuj and Hamsten, Anders and Watkins, Hugh and Bakker, Stephan J L and van Gilst, Wiek H and Janipalli, Charles S and Mani, K Radha and Yajnik, Chittaranjan S and Hofman, Albert and Mattace-Raso, Francesco U S and Oostra, Ben A and Demirkan, Ayse and Isaacs, Aaron and Rivadeneira, Fernando and Lakatta, Edward G and Orr{\`u}, Marco and Scuteri, Angelo and Ala-Korpela, Mika and Kangas, Antti J and Lyytik{\"a}inen, Leo-Pekka and Soininen, Pasi and Tukiainen, Taru and W{\"u}rtz, Peter and Ong, Rick Twee-Hee and D{\"o}rr, Marcus and Kroemer, Heyo K and V{\"o}lker, Uwe and V{\"o}lzke, Henry and Galan, Pilar and Hercberg, Serge and Lathrop, Mark and Zelenika, Diana and Deloukas, Panos and Mangino, Massimo and Spector, Tim D and Zhai, Guangju and Meschia, James F and Nalls, Michael A and Sharma, Pankaj and Terzic, Janos and Kumar, M V Kranthi and Denniff, Matthew and Zukowska-Szczechowska, Ewa and Wagenknecht, Lynne E and Fowkes, F Gerald R and Charchar, Fadi J and Schwarz, Peter E H and Hayward, Caroline and Guo, Xiuqing and Rotimi, Charles and Bots, Michiel L and Brand, Eva and Samani, Nilesh J and Polasek, Ozren and Talmud, Philippa J and Nyberg, Fredrik and Kuh, Diana and Laan, Maris and Hveem, Kristian and Palmer, Lyle J and van der Schouw, Yvonne T and Casas, Juan P and Mohlke, Karen L and Vineis, Paolo and Raitakari, Olli and Ganesh, Santhi K and Wong, Tien Y and Tai, E Shyong and Cooper, Richard S and Laakso, Markku and Rao, Dabeeru C and Harris, Tamara B and Morris, Richard W and Dominiczak, Anna F and Kivimaki, Mika and Marmot, Michael G and Miki, Tetsuro and Saleheen, Danish and Chandak, Giriraj R and Coresh, Josef and Navis, Gerjan and Salomaa, Veikko and Han, Bok-Ghee and Zhu, Xiaofeng and Kooner, Jaspal S and Melander, Olle and Ridker, Paul M and Bandinelli, Stefania and Gyllensten, Ulf B and Wright, Alan F and Wilson, James F and Ferrucci, Luigi and Farrall, Martin and Tuomilehto, Jaakko and Pramstaller, Peter P and Elosua, Roberto and Soranzo, Nicole and Sijbrands, Eric J G and Altshuler, David and Loos, Ruth J F and Shuldiner, Alan R and Gieger, Christian and Meneton, Pierre and Uitterlinden, Andr{\'e} G and Wareham, Nicholas J and Gudnason, Vilmundur and Rotter, Jerome I and Rettig, Rainer and Uda, Manuela and Strachan, David P and Witteman, Jacqueline C M and Hartikainen, Anna-Liisa and Beckmann, Jacques S and Boerwinkle, Eric and Vasan, Ramachandran S and Boehnke, Michael and Larson, Martin G and Jarvelin, Marjo-Riitta and Psaty, Bruce M and Abecasis, Goncalo R and Chakravarti, Aravinda and Elliott, Paul and van Duijn, Cornelia M and Newton-Cheh, Christopher and Levy, Daniel and Caulfield, Mark J and Johnson, Toby} } @article {1382, title = {Carotid intima-media thickness progression to predict cardiovascular events in the general population (the PROG-IMT collaborative project): a meta-analysis of individual participant data.}, journal = {Lancet}, volume = {379}, year = {2012}, month = {2012 Jun 02}, pages = {2053-62}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) is related to the risk of cardiovascular events in the general population. An association between changes in cIMT and cardiovascular risk is frequently assumed but has rarely been reported. Our aim was to test this association.

METHODS: We identified general population studies that assessed cIMT at least twice and followed up participants for myocardial infarction, stroke, or death. The study teams collaborated in an individual participant data meta-analysis. Excluding individuals with previous myocardial infarction or stroke, we assessed the association between cIMT progression and the risk of cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, stroke, vascular death, or a combination of these) for each study with Cox regression. The log hazard ratios (HRs) per SD difference were pooled by random effects meta-analysis.

FINDINGS: Of 21 eligible studies, 16 with 36,984 participants were included. During a mean follow-up of 7{\textperiodcentered}0 years, 1519 myocardial infarctions, 1339 strokes, and 2028 combined endpoints (myocardial infarction, stroke, vascular death) occurred. Yearly cIMT progression was derived from two ultrasound visits 2-7 years (median 4 years) apart. For mean common carotid artery intima-media thickness progression, the overall HR of the combined endpoint was 0{\textperiodcentered}97 (95\% CI 0{\textperiodcentered}94-1{\textperiodcentered}00) when adjusted for age, sex, and mean common carotid artery intima-media thickness, and 0{\textperiodcentered}98 (0{\textperiodcentered}95-1{\textperiodcentered}01) when also adjusted for vascular risk factors. Although we detected no associations with cIMT progression in sensitivity analyses, the mean cIMT of the two ultrasound scans was positively and robustly associated with cardiovascular risk (HR for the combined endpoint 1{\textperiodcentered}16, 95\% CI 1{\textperiodcentered}10-1{\textperiodcentered}22, adjusted for age, sex, mean common carotid artery intima-media thickness progression, and vascular risk factors). In three studies including 3439 participants who had four ultrasound scans, cIMT progression did not correlate between occassions (reproducibility correlations between r=-0{\textperiodcentered}06 and r=-0{\textperiodcentered}02).

INTERPRETATION: The association between cIMT progression assessed from two ultrasound scans and cardiovascular risk in the general population remains unproven. No conclusion can be derived for the use of cIMT progression as a surrogate in clinical trials.

FUNDING: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.

}, keywords = {Cardiovascular Diseases, Carotid Intima-Media Thickness, Disease Progression, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Myocardial Infarction, Prognosis, Risk Assessment, Stroke}, issn = {1474-547X}, doi = {10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60441-3}, author = {Lorenz, Matthias W and Polak, Joseph F and Kavousi, Maryam and Mathiesen, Ellisiv B and V{\"o}lzke, Henry and Tuomainen, Tomi-Pekka and Sander, Dirk and Plichart, Matthieu and Catapano, Alberico L and Robertson, Christine M and Kiechl, Stefan and Rundek, Tatjana and Desvarieux, Mo{\"\i}se and Lind, Lars and Schmid, Caroline and DasMahapatra, Pronabesh and Gao, Lu and Ziegelbauer, Kathrin and Bots, Michiel L and Thompson, Simon G} } @article {6549, title = {Common carotid intima-media thickness measurements do not improve cardiovascular risk prediction in individuals with elevated blood pressure: the USE-IMT collaboration.}, journal = {Hypertension}, volume = {63}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Jun}, pages = {1173-81}, abstract = {

Carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) is a marker of cardiovascular risk. It is unclear whether measurement of mean common CIMT improves 10-year risk prediction of first-time myocardial infarction or stroke in individuals with elevated blood pressure. We performed an analysis among individuals with elevated blood pressure (i.e., a systolic blood pressure >=140 mm Hg and a diastolic blood pressure >= 90 mm Hg) in USE-IMT, a large ongoing individual participant data meta-analysis. We refitted the risk factors of the Framingham Risk Score on asymptomatic individuals (baseline model) and expanded this model with mean common CIMT (CIMT model) measurements. From both models, 10-year risks to develop a myocardial infarction or stroke were estimated. In individuals with elevated blood pressure, we compared discrimination and calibration of the 2 models and calculated the net reclassification improvement (NRI). We included 17 254 individuals with elevated blood pressure from 16 studies. During a median follow-up of 9.9 years, 2014 first-time myocardial infarctions or strokes occurred. The C-statistics of the baseline and CIMT models were similar (0.73). NRI with the addition of mean common CIMT was small and not significant (1.4\%; 95\% confidence intervals, -1.1 to 3.7). In those at intermediate risk (n=5008, 10-year absolute risk of 10\% to 20\%), the NRI was 5.6\% (95\% confidence intervals, 1.6-10.4). There is no added value of measurement of mean common CIMT in individuals with elevated blood pressure for improving cardiovascular risk prediction. For those at intermediate risk, the addition of mean common CIMT to an existing cardiovascular risk score is small but statistically significant.

}, keywords = {Adult, Aged, Antihypertensive Agents, Blood Pressure, Cardiovascular Diseases, Carotid Artery, Common, Carotid Intima-Media Thickness, Cohort Studies, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Middle Aged, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors}, issn = {1524-4563}, doi = {10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.02683}, author = {Bots, Michiel L and Groenewegen, Karlijn A and Anderson, Todd J and Britton, Annie R and Dekker, Jacqueline M and Engstr{\"o}m, Gunnar and Evans, Greg W and de Graaf, Jacqueline and Grobbee, Diederick E and Hedblad, Bo and Hofman, Albert and Holewijn, Suzanne and Ikeda, Ai and Kavousi, Maryam and Kitagawa, Kazuo and Kitamura, Akihiko and Ikram, M Arfan and Lonn, Eva M and Lorenz, Matthias W and Mathiesen, Ellisiv B and Nijpels, Giel and Okazaki, Shuhei and O{\textquoteright}Leary, Daniel H and Polak, Joseph F and Price, Jacqueline F and Robertson, Christine and Rembold, Christopher M and Rosvall, Maria and Rundek, Tatjana and Salonen, Jukka T and Sitzer, Matthias and Stehouwer, Coen D A and Franco, Oscar H and Peters, Sanne A E and den Ruijter, Hester M} } @article {6557, title = {Prediction of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis in the general population: identification of high-risk groups.}, journal = {Stroke}, volume = {45}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Aug}, pages = {2366-71}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Because of a low prevalence of severe carotid stenosis in the general population, screening for presence of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (ACAS) is not warranted. Possibly, for certain subgroups, screening is worthwhile. The present study aims to develop prediction rules for the presence of ACAS (>50\% and >70\%).

METHODS: Individual participant data from 4 population-based cohort studies (Malm{\"o} Diet and Cancer Study, Troms{\o} Study, Carotid Atherosclerosis Progression Study, and Cardiovascular Health Study; totaling 23 706 participants) were pooled. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine which variables predict presence of ACAS (>50\% and >70\%). Calibration and discrimination of the models were assessed, and bootstrapping was used to correct for overfitting.

RESULTS: Age, sex, history of vascular disease, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein ratio, diabetes mellitus, and current smoking were predictors of stenosis (>50\% and >70\%). The calibration of the model was good confirmed by a nonsignificant Hosmer and Lemeshow test for moderate (P=0.59) and severe stenosis (P=0.07). The models discriminated well between participants with and without stenosis, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve corrected for over optimism of 0.82 (95\% confidence interval, 0.80-0.84) for moderate stenosis and of 0.87 (95\% confidence interval, 0.85-0.90) for severe stenosis. The regression coefficients of the predictors were converted into a score chart to facilitate practical application.

CONCLUSIONS: A clinical prediction rule was developed that allows identification of subgroups with high prevalence of moderate (>50\%) and severe (>70\%) ACAS. When confirmed in comparable cohorts, application of the prediction rule may lead to a reduction in the number needed to screen for ACAS.

}, keywords = {Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Blood Pressure, Carotid Stenosis, Female, Humans, Life Style, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Prevalence, Registries, Risk, Smoking}, issn = {1524-4628}, doi = {10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005145}, author = {de Weerd, Marjolein and Greving, Jacoba P and Hedblad, Bo and Lorenz, Matthias W and Mathiesen, Ellisiv B and O{\textquoteright}Leary, Daniel H and Rosvall, Maria and Sitzer, Matthias and de Borst, Gert Jan and Buskens, Erik and Bots, Michiel L} } @article {6568, title = {Mendelian randomization of blood lipids for coronary heart disease.}, journal = {Eur Heart J}, volume = {36}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Mar 01}, pages = {539-50}, abstract = {

AIMS: To investigate the causal role of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglycerides in coronary heart disease (CHD) using multiple instrumental variables for Mendelian randomization.

METHODS AND RESULTS: We developed weighted allele scores based on single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with established associations with HDL-C, triglycerides, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). For each trait, we constructed two scores. The first was unrestricted, including all independent SNPs associated with the lipid trait identified from a prior meta-analysis (threshold P < 2 {\texttimes} 10(-6)); and the second a restricted score, filtered to remove any SNPs also associated with either of the other two lipid traits at P <= 0.01. Mendelian randomization meta-analyses were conducted in 17 studies including 62,199 participants and 12,099 CHD events. Both the unrestricted and restricted allele scores for LDL-C (42 and 19 SNPs, respectively) associated with CHD. For HDL-C, the unrestricted allele score (48 SNPs) was associated with CHD (OR: 0.53; 95\% CI: 0.40, 0.70), per 1 mmol/L higher HDL-C, but neither the restricted allele score (19 SNPs; OR: 0.91; 95\% CI: 0.42, 1.98) nor the unrestricted HDL-C allele score adjusted for triglycerides, LDL-C, or statin use (OR: 0.81; 95\% CI: 0.44, 1.46) showed a robust association. For triglycerides, the unrestricted allele score (67 SNPs) and the restricted allele score (27 SNPs) were both associated with CHD (OR: 1.62; 95\% CI: 1.24, 2.11 and 1.61; 95\% CI: 1.00, 2.59, respectively) per 1-log unit increment. However, the unrestricted triglyceride score adjusted for HDL-C, LDL-C, and statin use gave an OR for CHD of 1.01 (95\% CI: 0.59, 1.75).

CONCLUSION: The genetic findings support a causal effect of triglycerides on CHD risk, but a causal role for HDL-C, though possible, remains less certain.

}, keywords = {Case-Control Studies, Cholesterol, HDL, Coronary Artery Disease, Female, Gene Frequency, Genotype, Genotyping Techniques, Humans, Male, Mendelian Randomization Analysis, Middle Aged, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Risk Assessment, Triglycerides}, issn = {1522-9645}, doi = {10.1093/eurheartj/eht571}, author = {Holmes, Michael V and Asselbergs, Folkert W and Palmer, Tom M and Drenos, Fotios and Lanktree, Matthew B and Nelson, Christopher P and Dale, Caroline E and Padmanabhan, Sandosh and Finan, Chris and Swerdlow, Daniel I and Tragante, Vinicius and van Iperen, Erik P A and Sivapalaratnam, Suthesh and Shah, Sonia and Elbers, Clara C and Shah, Tina and Engmann, Jorgen and Giambartolomei, Claudia and White, Jon and Zabaneh, Delilah and Sofat, Reecha and McLachlan, Stela and Doevendans, Pieter A and Balmforth, Anthony J and Hall, Alistair S and North, Kari E and Almoguera, Berta and Hoogeveen, Ron C and Cushman, Mary and Fornage, Myriam and Patel, Sanjay R and Redline, Susan and Siscovick, David S and Tsai, Michael Y and Karczewski, Konrad J and Hofker, Marten H and Verschuren, W Monique and Bots, Michiel L and van der Schouw, Yvonne T and Melander, Olle and Dominiczak, Anna F and Morris, Richard and Ben-Shlomo, Yoav and Price, Jackie and Kumari, Meena and Baumert, Jens and Peters, Annette and Thorand, Barbara and Koenig, Wolfgang and Gaunt, Tom R and Humphries, Steve E and Clarke, Robert and Watkins, Hugh and Farrall, Martin and Wilson, James G and Rich, Stephen S and de Bakker, Paul I W and Lange, Leslie A and Davey Smith, George and Reiner, Alex P and Talmud, Philippa J and Kivimaki, Mika and Lawlor, Debbie A and Dudbridge, Frank and Samani, Nilesh J and Keating, Brendan J and Hingorani, Aroon D and Casas, Juan P} } @article {6876, title = {Race/Ethnic Differences in the Associations of the Framingham Risk Factors with Carotid IMT and Cardiovascular Events.}, journal = {PLoS One}, volume = {10}, year = {2015}, month = {2015}, pages = {e0132321}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Clinical manifestations and outcomes of atherosclerotic disease differ between ethnic groups. In addition, the prevalence of risk factors is substantially different. Primary prevention programs are based on data derived from almost exclusively White people. We investigated how race/ethnic differences modify the associations of established risk factors with atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events.

METHODS: We used data from an ongoing individual participant meta-analysis involving 17 population-based cohorts worldwide. We selected 60,211 participants without cardiovascular disease at baseline with available data on ethnicity (White, Black, Asian or Hispanic). We generated a multivariable linear regression model containing risk factors and ethnicity predicting mean common carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) and a multivariable Cox regression model predicting myocardial infarction or stroke. For each risk factor we assessed how the association with the preclinical and clinical measures of cardiovascular atherosclerotic disease was affected by ethnicity.

RESULTS: Ethnicity appeared to significantly modify the associations between risk factors and CIMT and cardiovascular events. The association between age and CIMT was weaker in Blacks and Hispanics. Systolic blood pressure associated more strongly with CIMT in Asians. HDL cholesterol and smoking associated less with CIMT in Blacks. Furthermore, the association of age and total cholesterol levels with the occurrence of cardiovascular events differed between Blacks and Whites.

CONCLUSION: The magnitude of associations between risk factors and the presence of atherosclerotic disease differs between race/ethnic groups. These subtle, yet significant differences provide insight in the etiology of cardiovascular disease among race/ethnic groups. These insights aid the race/ethnic-specific implementation of primary prevention.

}, keywords = {Adult, Age Distribution, Aged, Carotid Artery Diseases, Carotid Intima-Media Thickness, Cholesterol, HDL, Cholesterol, LDL, Comorbidity, Continental Population Groups, Diabetes Mellitus, Dyslipidemias, Ethnic Groups, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Global Health, Humans, Hypertension, Incidence, Linear Models, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Prevalence, Proportional Hazards Models, Risk Factors, Smoking, Stroke}, issn = {1932-6203}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0132321}, author = {Gijsberts, Crystel M and Groenewegen, Karlijn A and Hoefer, Imo E and Eijkemans, Marinus J C and Asselbergs, Folkert W and Anderson, Todd J and Britton, Annie R and Dekker, Jacqueline M and Engstr{\"o}m, Gunnar and Evans, Greg W and de Graaf, Jacqueline and Grobbee, Diederick E and Hedblad, Bo and Holewijn, Suzanne and Ikeda, Ai and Kitagawa, Kazuo and Kitamura, Akihiko and de Kleijn, Dominique P V and Lonn, Eva M and Lorenz, Matthias W and Mathiesen, Ellisiv B and Nijpels, Giel and Okazaki, Shuhei and O{\textquoteright}Leary, Daniel H and Pasterkamp, Gerard and Peters, Sanne A E and Polak, Joseph F and Price, Jacqueline F and Robertson, Christine and Rembold, Christopher M and Rosvall, Maria and Rundek, Tatjana and Salonen, Jukka T and Sitzer, Matthias and Stehouwer, Coen D A and Bots, Michiel L and den Ruijter, Hester M} } @article {7574, title = {Automatic identification of variables in epidemiological datasets using logic regression.}, journal = {BMC Med Inform Decis Mak}, volume = {17}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Apr 13}, pages = {40}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: For an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis, multiple datasets must be transformed in a consistent format, e.g. using uniform variable names. When large numbers of datasets have to be processed, this can be a time-consuming and error-prone task. Automated or semi-automated identification of variables can help to reduce the workload and improve the data quality. For semi-automation high sensitivity in the recognition of matching variables is particularly important, because it allows creating software which for a target variable presents a choice of source variables, from which a user can choose the matching one, with only low risk of having missed a correct source variable.

METHODS: For each variable in a set of target variables, a number of simple rules were manually created. With logic regression, an optimal Boolean combination of these rules was searched for every target variable, using a random subset of a large database of epidemiological and clinical cohort data (construction subset). In a second subset of this database (validation subset), this optimal combination rules were validated.

RESULTS: In the construction sample, 41 target variables were allocated on average with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 34\%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 95\%. In the validation sample, PPV was 33\%, whereas NPV remained at 94\%. In the construction sample, PPV was 50\% or less in 63\% of all variables, in the validation sample in 71\% of all variables.

CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that~the application of logic regression in a complex data management task in large epidemiological IPD meta-analyses is feasible. However, the performance of the algorithm is poor, which may require backup strategies.

}, issn = {1472-6947}, doi = {10.1186/s12911-017-0429-1}, author = {Lorenz, Matthias W and Abdi, Negin Ashtiani and Scheckenbach, Frank and Pflug, Anja and B{\"u}lb{\"u}l, Alpaslan and Catapano, Alberico L and Agewall, Stefan and Ezhov, Marat and Bots, Michiel L and Kiechl, Stefan and Orth, Andreas} } @article {7801, title = {Common and Rare Coding Genetic Variation Underlying the Electrocardiographic PR Interval.}, journal = {Circ Genom Precis Med}, volume = {11}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 May}, pages = {e002037}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Electrical conduction from the cardiac sinoatrial node to the ventricles is critical for normal heart function. Genome-wide association studies have identified more than a dozen common genetic loci that are associated with PR interval. However, it is unclear whether rare and low-frequency variants also contribute to PR interval heritability.

METHODS: We performed large-scale meta-analyses of the PR interval that included 83 367 participants of European ancestry and 9436 of African ancestry. We examined both common and rare variants associated with the PR interval.

RESULTS: We identified 31 genetic loci that were significantly associated with PR interval after Bonferroni correction (<1.2{\texttimes}10), including 11 novel loci that have not been reported previously. Many of these loci are involved in heart morphogenesis. In gene-based analysis, we found that multiple rare variants at (=5.9{\texttimes}10) and (=1.1{\texttimes}10) were associated with PR interval. locus also was implicated in the common variant analysis, whereas was a novel locus.

CONCLUSIONS: We identified common variants at 11 novel loci and rare variants within 2 gene regions that were significantly associated with PR interval. Our findings provide novel insights to the current understanding of atrioventricular conduction, which is critical for cardiac activity and an important determinant of health.

}, issn = {2574-8300}, doi = {10.1161/CIRCGEN.117.002037}, author = {Lin, Honghuang and van Setten, Jessica and Smith, Albert V and Bihlmeyer, Nathan A and Warren, Helen R and Brody, Jennifer A and Radmanesh, Farid and Hall, Leanne and Grarup, Niels and M{\"u}ller-Nurasyid, Martina and Boutin, Thibaud and Verweij, Niek and Lin, Henry J and Li-Gao, Ruifang and van den Berg, Marten E and Marten, Jonathan and Weiss, Stefan and Prins, Bram P and Haessler, Jeffrey and Lyytik{\"a}inen, Leo-Pekka and Mei, Hao and Harris, Tamara B and Launer, Lenore J and Li, Man and Alonso, Alvaro and Soliman, Elsayed Z and Connell, John M and Huang, Paul L and Weng, Lu-Chen and Jameson, Heather S and Hucker, William and Hanley, Alan and Tucker, Nathan R and Chen, Yii-Der Ida and Bis, Joshua C and Rice, Kenneth M and Sitlani, Colleen M and Kors, Jan A and Xie, Zhijun and Wen, Chengping and Magnani, Jared W and Nelson, Christopher P and Kanters, J{\o}rgen K and Sinner, Moritz F and Strauch, Konstantin and Peters, Annette and Waldenberger, Melanie and Meitinger, Thomas and Bork-Jensen, Jette and Pedersen, Oluf and Linneberg, Allan and Rudan, Igor and de Boer, Rudolf A and van der Meer, Peter and Yao, Jie and Guo, Xiuqing and Taylor, Kent D and Sotoodehnia, Nona and Rotter, Jerome I and Mook-Kanamori, Dennis O and Trompet, Stella and Rivadeneira, Fernando and Uitterlinden, Andre and Eijgelsheim, Mark and Padmanabhan, Sandosh and Smith, Blair H and V{\"o}lzke, Henry and Felix, Stephan B and Homuth, Georg and V{\"o}lker, Uwe and Mangino, Massimo and Spector, Timothy D and Bots, Michiel L and Perez, Marco and K{\"a}h{\"o}nen, Mika and Raitakari, Olli T and Gudnason, Vilmundur and Arking, Dan E and Munroe, Patricia B and Psaty, Bruce M and van Duijn, Cornelia M and Benjamin, Emelia J and Rosand, Jonathan and Samani, Nilesh J and Hansen, Torben and K{\"a}{\"a}b, Stefan and Polasek, Ozren and van der Harst, Pim and Heckbert, Susan R and Jukema, J Wouter and Stricker, Bruno H and Hayward, Caroline and D{\"o}rr, Marcus and Jamshidi, Yalda and Asselbergs, Folkert W and Kooperberg, Charles and Lehtim{\"a}ki, Terho and Wilson, James G and Ellinor, Patrick T and Lubitz, Steven A and Isaacs, Aaron} } @article {7809, title = {Exome-chip meta-analysis identifies novel loci associated with cardiac conduction, including ADAMTS6.}, journal = {Genome Biol}, volume = {19}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 07 17}, pages = {87}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Genome-wide association studies conducted on QRS duration, an electrocardiographic measurement associated with heart failure and sudden cardiac death, have led to novel biological insights into cardiac function. However, the variants identified fall predominantly in non-coding regions and their underlying mechanisms remain unclear.

RESULTS: Here, we identify putative functional coding variation associated with changes in the QRS interval duration by combining Illumina HumanExome BeadChip genotype data from 77,898 participants of European ancestry and 7695 of African descent in our discovery cohort, followed by replication in 111,874~individuals of European ancestry from the UK Biobank and deCODE cohorts. We identify ten novel loci, seven within coding regions, including ADAMTS6, significantly associated with QRS duration in gene-based analyses. ADAMTS6 encodes a secreted metalloprotease of currently unknown function. In vitro validation analysis shows that the QRS-associated variants lead to impaired ADAMTS6 secretion and loss-of function analysis in mice demonstrates a previously unappreciated role for ADAMTS6 in connexin 43 gap junction expression, which is essential for myocardial conduction.

CONCLUSIONS: Our approach identifies novel coding and non-coding variants underlying ventricular depolarization and provides a possible mechanism for the ADAMTS6-associated conduction changes.

}, issn = {1474-760X}, doi = {10.1186/s13059-018-1457-6}, author = {Prins, Bram P and Mead, Timothy J and Brody, Jennifer A and Sveinbjornsson, Gardar and Ntalla, Ioanna and Bihlmeyer, Nathan A and van den Berg, Marten and Bork-Jensen, Jette and Cappellani, Stefania and Van Duijvenboden, Stefan and Klena, Nikolai T and Gabriel, George C and Liu, Xiaoqin and Gulec, Cagri and Grarup, Niels and Haessler, Jeffrey and Hall, Leanne M and Iorio, Annamaria and Isaacs, Aaron and Li-Gao, Ruifang and Lin, Honghuang and Liu, Ching-Ti and Lyytik{\"a}inen, Leo-Pekka and Marten, Jonathan and Mei, Hao and M{\"u}ller-Nurasyid, Martina and Orini, Michele and Padmanabhan, Sandosh and Radmanesh, Farid and Ramirez, Julia and Robino, Antonietta and Schwartz, Molly and van Setten, Jessica and Smith, Albert V and Verweij, Niek and Warren, Helen R and Weiss, Stefan and Alonso, Alvaro and Arnar, David O and Bots, Michiel L and de Boer, Rudolf A and Dominiczak, Anna F and Eijgelsheim, Mark and Ellinor, Patrick T and Guo, Xiuqing and Felix, Stephan B and Harris, Tamara B and Hayward, Caroline and Heckbert, Susan R and Huang, Paul L and Jukema, J W and K{\"a}h{\"o}nen, Mika and Kors, Jan A and Lambiase, Pier D and Launer, Lenore J and Li, Man and Linneberg, Allan and Nelson, Christopher P and Pedersen, Oluf and Perez, Marco and Peters, Annette and Polasek, Ozren and Psaty, Bruce M and Raitakari, Olli T and Rice, Kenneth M and Rotter, Jerome I and Sinner, Moritz F and Soliman, Elsayed Z and Spector, Tim D and Strauch, Konstantin and Thorsteinsdottir, Unnur and Tinker, Andrew and Trompet, Stella and Uitterlinden, Andre and Vaartjes, Ilonca and van der Meer, Peter and V{\"o}lker, Uwe and V{\"o}lzke, Henry and Waldenberger, Melanie and Wilson, James G and Xie, Zhijun and Asselbergs, Folkert W and D{\"o}rr, Marcus and van Duijn, Cornelia M and Gasparini, Paolo and Gudbjartsson, Daniel F and Gudnason, Vilmundur and Hansen, Torben and K{\"a}{\"a}b, Stefan and Kanters, J{\o}rgen K and Kooperberg, Charles and Lehtim{\"a}ki, Terho and Lin, Henry J and Lubitz, Steven A and Mook-Kanamori, Dennis O and Conti, Francesco J and Newton-Cheh, Christopher H and Rosand, Jonathan and Rudan, Igor and Samani, Nilesh J and Sinagra, Gianfranco and Smith, Blair H and Holm, Hilma and Stricker, Bruno H and Ulivi, Sheila and Sotoodehnia, Nona and Apte, Suneel S and van der Harst, Pim and Stefansson, Kari and Munroe, Patricia B and Arking, Dan E and Lo, Cecilia W and Jamshidi, Yalda} } @article {7784, title = {ExomeChip-Wide Analysis of 95 626 Individuals Identifies 10 Novel Loci Associated With QT and JT Intervals.}, journal = {Circ Genom Precis Med}, volume = {11}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Jan}, pages = {e001758}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: QT interval, measured through a standard ECG, captures the time it takes for the cardiac ventricles to depolarize and repolarize. JT interval is the component of the QT interval that reflects ventricular repolarization alone. Prolonged QT interval has been linked to higher risk of sudden cardiac arrest.

METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed an ExomeChip-wide analysis for both QT and JT intervals, including 209 449 variants, both common and rare, in 17 341 genes from the Illumina Infinium HumanExome BeadChip. We identified 10 loci that modulate QT and JT interval duration that have not been previously reported in the literature using single-variant statistical models in a meta-analysis of 95 626 individuals from 23 cohorts (comprised 83 884 European ancestry individuals, 9610 blacks, 1382 Hispanics, and 750 Asians). This brings the total number of ventricular repolarization associated loci to 45. In addition, our approach of using coding variants has highlighted the role of 17 specific genes for involvement in ventricular repolarization, 7 of which are in novel loci.

CONCLUSIONS: Our analyses show a role for myocyte internal structure and interconnections in modulating QT interval duration, adding to previous known roles of potassium, sodium, and calcium ion regulation, as well as autonomic control. We anticipate that these discoveries will open new paths to the goal of making novel remedies for the prevention of lethal ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac arrest.

}, issn = {2574-8300}, doi = {10.1161/CIRCGEN.117.001758}, author = {Bihlmeyer, Nathan A and Brody, Jennifer A and Smith, Albert Vernon and Warren, Helen R and Lin, Honghuang and Isaacs, Aaron and Liu, Ching-Ti and Marten, Jonathan and Radmanesh, Farid and Hall, Leanne M and Grarup, Niels and Mei, Hao and M{\"u}ller-Nurasyid, Martina and Huffman, Jennifer E and Verweij, Niek and Guo, Xiuqing and Yao, Jie and Li-Gao, Ruifang and van den Berg, Marten and Weiss, Stefan and Prins, Bram P and van Setten, Jessica and Haessler, Jeffrey and Lyytik{\"a}inen, Leo-Pekka and Li, Man and Alonso, Alvaro and Soliman, Elsayed Z and Bis, Joshua C and Austin, Tom and Chen, Yii-Der Ida and Psaty, Bruce M and Harrris, Tamara B and Launer, Lenore J and Padmanabhan, Sandosh and Dominiczak, Anna and Huang, Paul L and Xie, Zhijun and Ellinor, Patrick T and Kors, Jan A and Campbell, Archie and Murray, Alison D and Nelson, Christopher P and Tobin, Martin D and Bork-Jensen, Jette and Hansen, Torben and Pedersen, Oluf and Linneberg, Allan and Sinner, Moritz F and Peters, Annette and Waldenberger, Melanie and Meitinger, Thomas and Perz, Siegfried and Kolcic, Ivana and Rudan, Igor and de Boer, Rudolf A and van der Meer, Peter and Lin, Henry J and Taylor, Kent D and de Mutsert, Ren{\'e}e and Trompet, Stella and Jukema, J Wouter and Maan, Arie C and Stricker, Bruno H C and Rivadeneira, Fernando and Uitterlinden, Andre and V{\"o}lker, Uwe and Homuth, Georg and V{\"o}lzke, Henry and Felix, Stephan B and Mangino, Massimo and Spector, Timothy D and Bots, Michiel L and Perez, Marco and Raitakari, Olli T and K{\"a}h{\"o}nen, Mika and Mononen, Nina and Gudnason, Vilmundur and Munroe, Patricia B and Lubitz, Steven A and van Duijn, Cornelia M and Newton-Cheh, Christopher H and Hayward, Caroline and Rosand, Jonathan and Samani, Nilesh J and Kanters, J{\o}rgen K and Wilson, James G and K{\"a}{\"a}b, Stefan and Polasek, Ozren and van der Harst, Pim and Heckbert, Susan R and Rotter, Jerome I and Mook-Kanamori, Dennis O and Eijgelsheim, Mark and D{\"o}rr, Marcus and Jamshidi, Yalda and Asselbergs, Folkert W and Kooperberg, Charles and Lehtim{\"a}ki, Terho and Arking, Dan E and Sotoodehnia, Nona} } @article {7846, title = {Predictive value for cardiovascular events of common carotid intima media thickness and its rate of change in individuals at high cardiovascular risk - Results from the PROG-IMT collaboration.}, journal = {PLoS One}, volume = {13}, year = {2018}, month = {2018}, pages = {e0191172}, abstract = {

AIMS: Carotid intima media thickness (CIMT) predicts cardiovascular (CVD) events, but the predictive value of CIMT change is debated. We assessed the relation between CIMT change and events in individuals at high cardiovascular risk.

METHODS AND RESULTS: From 31 cohorts with two CIMT scans (total n = 89070) on average 3.6 years apart and clinical follow-up, subcohorts were drawn: (A) individuals with at least 3 cardiovascular risk factors without previous CVD events, (B) individuals with carotid plaques without previous CVD events, and (C) individuals with previous CVD events. Cox regression models were fit to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of the combined endpoint (myocardial infarction, stroke or vascular death) per standard deviation (SD) of CIMT change, adjusted for CVD risk factors. These HRs were pooled across studies. In groups A, B and C we observed 3483, 2845 and 1165 endpoint events, respectively. Average common CIMT was 0.79mm (SD 0.16mm), and annual common CIMT change was 0.01mm (SD 0.07mm), both in group A. The pooled HR per SD of annual common CIMT change (0.02 to 0.43mm) was 0.99 (95\% confidence interval: 0.95-1.02) in group A, 0.98 (0.93-1.04) in group B, and 0.95 (0.89-1.04) in group C. The HR per SD of common CIMT (average of the first and the second CIMT scan, 0.09 to 0.75mm) was 1.15 (1.07-1.23) in group A, 1.13 (1.05-1.22) in group B, and 1.12 (1.05-1.20) in group C.

CONCLUSIONS: We confirm that common CIMT is associated with future CVD events in individuals at high risk. CIMT change does not relate to future event risk in high-risk individuals.

}, keywords = {Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Carotid Intima-Media Thickness, Female, Humans, Intersectoral Collaboration, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Risk Factors}, issn = {1932-6203}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0191172}, author = {Lorenz, Matthias W and Gao, Lu and Ziegelbauer, Kathrin and Norata, Giuseppe Danilo and Empana, Jean Philippe and Schmidtmann, Irene and Lin, Hung-Ju and McLachlan, Stela and Bokemark, Lena and Ronkainen, Kimmo and Amato, Mauro and Schminke, Ulf and Srinivasan, Sathanur R and Lind, Lars and Okazaki, Shuhei and Stehouwer, Coen D A and Willeit, Peter and Polak, Joseph F and Steinmetz, Helmuth and Sander, Dirk and Poppert, Holger and Desvarieux, Mo{\"\i}se and Ikram, M Arfan and Johnsen, Stein Harald and Staub, Daniel and Sirtori, Cesare R and Iglseder, Bernhard and Beloqui, Oscar and Engstr{\"o}m, Gunnar and Friera, Alfonso and Rozza, Francesco and Xie, Wuxiang and Parraga, Grace and Grigore, Liliana and Plichart, Matthieu and Blankenberg, Stefan and Su, Ta-Chen and Schmidt, Caroline and Tuomainen, Tomi-Pekka and Veglia, Fabrizio and V{\"o}lzke, Henry and Nijpels, Giel and Willeit, Johann and Sacco, Ralph L and Franco, Oscar H and Uthoff, Heiko and Hedblad, Bo and Suarez, Carmen and Izzo, Raffaele and Zhao, Dong and Wannarong, Thapat and Catapano, Alberico and Ducimetiere, Pierre and Espinola-Klein, Christine and Chien, Kuo-Liong and Price, Jackie F and Bergstr{\"o}m, G{\"o}ran and Kauhanen, Jussi and Tremoli, Elena and D{\"o}rr, Marcus and Berenson, Gerald and Kitagawa, Kazuo and Dekker, Jacqueline M and Kiechl, Stefan and Sitzer, Matthias and Bickel, Horst and Rundek, Tatjana and Hofman, Albert and Mathiesen, Ellisiv B and Castelnuovo, Samuela and Landecho, Manuel F and Rosvall, Maria and Gabriel, Rafael and de Luca, Nicola and Liu, Jing and Baldassarre, Damiano and Kavousi, Maryam and de Groot, Eric and Bots, Michiel L and Yanez, David N and Thompson, Simon G} } @article {9791, title = {Large-scale exome array summary statistics resources for glycemic traits to aid effector gene prioritization.}, journal = {Wellcome Open Res}, volume = {8}, year = {2023}, month = {2023}, pages = {483}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Genome-wide association studies for glycemic traits have identified hundreds of loci associated with these biomarkers of glucose homeostasis. Despite this success, the challenge remains to link variant associations to genes, and underlying biological pathways.

METHODS: To identify coding variant associations which may pinpoint effector genes at both novel and previously established genome-wide association loci, we performed meta-analyses of exome-array studies for four glycemic traits: glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c, up to 144,060 participants), fasting glucose (FG, up to 129,665 participants), fasting insulin (FI, up to 104,140) and 2hr glucose post-oral glucose challenge (2hGlu, up to 57,878). In addition, we performed network and pathway analyses.

RESULTS: Single-variant and gene-based association analyses identified coding variant associations at more than 60 genes, which when combined with other datasets may be useful to nominate effector genes. Network and pathway analyses identified pathways related to insulin secretion, zinc transport and fatty acid metabolism. HbA1c associations were strongly enriched in pathways related to blood cell biology.

CONCLUSIONS: Our results provided novel glycemic trait associations and highlighted pathways implicated in glycemic regulation. Exome-array summary statistic results are being made available to the scientific community to enable further discoveries.

}, issn = {2398-502X}, doi = {10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18754.1}, author = {Willems, Sara M and Ng, Natasha H J and Fernandez, Juan and Fine, Rebecca S and Wheeler, Eleanor and Wessel, Jennifer and Kitajima, Hidetoshi and Marenne, Gaelle and Sim, Xueling and Yaghootkar, Hanieh and Wang, Shuai and Chen, Sai and Chen, Yuning and Chen, Yii-Der Ida and Grarup, Niels and Li-Gao, Ruifang and Varga, Tibor V and Asimit, Jennifer L and Feng, Shuang and Strawbridge, Rona J and Kleinbrink, Erica L and Ahluwalia, Tarunveer S and An, Ping and Appel, Emil V and Arking, Dan E and Auvinen, Juha and Bielak, Lawrence F and Bihlmeyer, Nathan A and Bork-Jensen, Jette and Brody, Jennifer A and Campbell, Archie and Chu, Audrey Y and Davies, Gail and Demirkan, Ayse and Floyd, James S and Giulianini, Franco and Guo, Xiuqing and Gustafsson, Stefan and Jackson, Anne U and Jakobsdottir, Johanna and Jarvelin, Marjo-Riitta and Jensen, Richard A and Kanoni, Stavroula and Keinanen-Kiukaanniemi, Sirkka and Li, Man and Lu, Yingchang and Luan, Jian{\textquoteright}an and Manning, Alisa K and Marten, Jonathan and Meidtner, Karina and Mook-Kanamori, Dennis O and Muka, Taulant and Pistis, Giorgio and Prins, Bram and Rice, Kenneth M and Sanna, Serena and Smith, Albert Vernon and Smith, Jennifer A and Southam, Lorraine and Stringham, Heather M and Tragante, Vinicius and van der Laan, Sander W and Warren, Helen R and Yao, Jie and Yiorkas, Andrianos M and Zhang, Weihua and Zhao, Wei and Graff, Mariaelisa and Highland, Heather M and Justice, Anne E and Marouli, Eirini and Medina-G{\'o}mez, Carolina and Afaq, Saima and Alhejily, Wesam A and Amin, Najaf and Asselbergs, Folkert W and Bonnycastle, Lori L and Bots, Michiel L and Brandslund, Ivan and Chen, Ji and Danesh, John and de Mutsert, Ren{\'e}e and Dehghan, Abbas and Ebeling, Tapani and Elliott, Paul and Farmaki, Aliki-Eleni and Faul, Jessica D and Franks, Paul W and Franks, Steve and Fritsche, Andreas and Gjesing, Anette P and Goodarzi, Mark O and Gudnason, Vilmundur and Hallmans, G{\"o}ran and Harris, Tamara B and Herzig, Karl-Heinz and Hivert, Marie-France and J{\o}rgensen, Torben and J{\o}rgensen, Marit E and Jousilahti, Pekka and Kajantie, Eero and Karaleftheri, Maria and Kardia, Sharon L R and Kinnunen, Leena and Koistinen, Heikki A and Komulainen, Pirjo and Kovacs, Peter and Kuusisto, Johanna and Laakso, Markku and Lange, Leslie A and Launer, Lenore J and Leong, Aaron and Lindstr{\"o}m, Jaana and Manning Fox, Jocelyn E and M{\"a}nnist{\"o}, Satu and Maruthur, Nisa M and Moilanen, Leena and Mulas, Antonella and Nalls, Mike A and Neville, Matthew and Pankow, James S and Pattie, Alison and Petersen, Eva R B and Puolijoki, Hannu and Rasheed, Asif and Redmond, Paul and Renstrom, Frida and Roden, Michael and Saleheen, Danish and Saltevo, Juha and Savonen, Kai and Sebert, Sylvain and Skaaby, Tea and Small, Kerrin S and Stan{\v c}{\'a}kov{\'a}, Alena and Stokholm, Jakob and Strauch, Konstantin and Tai, E-Shyong and Taylor, Kent D and Thuesen, Betina H and T{\"o}njes, Anke and Tsafantakis, Emmanouil and Tuomi, Tiinamaija and Tuomilehto, Jaakko and Uusitupa, Matti and V{\"a}{\"a}r{\"a}sm{\"a}ki, Marja and Vaartjes, Ilonca and Zoledziewska, Magdalena and Abecasis, Goncalo and Balkau, Beverley and Bisgaard, Hans and Blakemore, Alexandra I and Bl{\"u}her, Matthias and Boeing, Heiner and Boerwinkle, Eric and B{\o}nnelykke, Klaus and Bottinger, Erwin P and Caulfield, Mark J and Chambers, John C and Chasman, Daniel I and Cheng, Ching-Yu and Collins, Francis S and Coresh, Josef and Cucca, Francesco and de Borst, Gert J and Deary, Ian J and Dedoussis, George and Deloukas, Panos and den Ruijter, Hester M and Dupuis, Jos{\'e}e and Evans, Michele K and Ferrannini, Ele and Franco, Oscar H and Grallert, Harald and Hansen, Torben and Hattersley, Andrew T and Hayward, Caroline and Hirschhorn, Joel N and Ikram, Arfan and Ingelsson, Erik and Karpe, Fredrik and Kaw, Kay-Tee and Kiess, Wieland and Kooner, Jaspal S and K{\"o}rner, Antje and Lakka, Timo and Langenberg, Claudia and Lind, Lars and Lindgren, Cecilia M and Linneberg, Allan and Lipovich, Leonard and Liu, Ching-Ti and Liu, Jun and Liu, Yongmei and Loos, Ruth J F and MacDonald, Patrick E and Mohlke, Karen L and Morris, Andrew D and Munroe, Patricia B and Murray, Alison and Padmanabhan, Sandosh and Palmer, Colin N A and Pasterkamp, Gerard and Pedersen, Oluf and Peyser, Patricia A and Polasek, Ozren and Porteous, David and Province, Michael A and Psaty, Bruce M and Rauramaa, Rainer and Ridker, Paul M and Rolandsson, Olov and Rorsman, Patrik and Rosendaal, Frits R and Rudan, Igor and Salomaa, Veikko and Schulze, Matthias B and Sladek, Robert and Smith, Blair H and Spector, Timothy D and Starr, John M and Stumvoll, Michael and van Duijn, Cornelia M and Walker, Mark and Wareham, Nick J and Weir, David R and Wilson, James G and Wong, Tien Yin and Zeggini, Eleftheria and Zonderman, Alan B and Rotter, Jerome I and Morris, Andrew P and Boehnke, Michael and Florez, Jose C and McCarthy, Mark I and Meigs, James B and Mahajan, Anubha and Scott, Robert A and Gloyn, Anna L and Barroso, In{\^e}s} }