@article {1198, title = {Triglyceride-mediated pathways and coronary disease: collaborative analysis of 101 studies.}, journal = {Lancet}, volume = {375}, year = {2010}, month = {2010 May 08}, pages = {1634-9}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Whether triglyceride-mediated pathways are causally relevant to coronary heart disease is uncertain. We studied a genetic variant that regulates triglyceride concentration to help judge likelihood of causality.

METHODS: We assessed the -1131T>C (rs662799) promoter polymorphism of the apolipoprotein A5 (APOA5) gene in relation to triglyceride concentration, several other risk factors, and risk of coronary heart disease. We compared disease risk for genetically-raised triglyceride concentration (20,842 patients with coronary heart disease, 35,206 controls) with that recorded for equivalent differences in circulating triglyceride concentration in prospective studies (302 430 participants with no history of cardiovascular disease; 12,785 incident cases of coronary heart disease during 2.79 million person-years at risk). We analysed -1131T>C in 1795 people without a history of cardiovascular disease who had information about lipoprotein concentration and diameter obtained by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

FINDINGS: The minor allele frequency of -1131T>C was 8\% (95\% CI 7-9). -1131T>C was not significantly associated with several non-lipid risk factors or LDL cholesterol, and it was modestly associated with lower HDL cholesterol (mean difference per C allele 3.5\% [95\% CI 2.6-4.6]; 0.053 mmol/L [0.039-0.068]), lower apolipoprotein AI (1.3\% [0.3-2.3]; 0.023 g/L [0.005-0.041]), and higher apolipoprotein B (3.2\% [1.3-5.1]; 0.027 g/L [0.011-0.043]). By contrast, for every C allele inherited, mean triglyceride concentration was 16.0\% (95\% CI 12.9-18.7), or 0.25 mmol/L (0.20-0.29), higher (p=4.4x10(-24)). The odds ratio for coronary heart disease was 1.18 (95\% CI 1.11-1.26; p=2.6x10(-7)) per C allele, which was concordant with the hazard ratio of 1.10 (95\% CI 1.08-1.12) per 16\% higher triglyceride concentration recorded in prospective studies. -1131T>C was significantly associated with higher VLDL particle concentration (mean difference per C allele 12.2 nmol/L [95\% CI 7.7-16.7]; p=9.3x10(-8)) and smaller HDL particle size (0.14 nm [0.08-0.20]; p=7.0x10(-5)), factors that could mediate the effects of triglyceride.

INTERPRETATION: These data are consistent with a causal association between triglyceride-mediated pathways and coronary heart disease.

FUNDING: British Heart Foundation, UK Medical Research Council, Novartis.

}, keywords = {Apolipoprotein A-V, Apolipoproteins, Apolipoproteins A, Coronary Disease, Gene Frequency, Genotype, Humans, Lipids, Lipoproteins, HDL, Lipoproteins, LDL, Lipoproteins, VLDL, Mendelian Randomization Analysis, Particle Size, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Risk Factors, Triglycerides}, issn = {1474-547X}, doi = {10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60545-4}, author = {Sarwar, Nadeem and Sandhu, Manjinder S and Ricketts, Sally L and Butterworth, Adam S and Di Angelantonio, Emanuele and Boekholdt, S Matthijs and Ouwehand, Willem and Watkins, Hugh and Samani, Nilesh J and Saleheen, Danish and Lawlor, Debbie and Reilly, Muredach P and Hingorani, Aroon D and Talmud, Philippa J and Danesh, John} } @article {6568, title = {Mendelian randomization of blood lipids for coronary heart disease.}, journal = {Eur Heart J}, volume = {36}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Mar 01}, pages = {539-50}, abstract = {

AIMS: To investigate the causal role of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglycerides in coronary heart disease (CHD) using multiple instrumental variables for Mendelian randomization.

METHODS AND RESULTS: We developed weighted allele scores based on single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with established associations with HDL-C, triglycerides, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). For each trait, we constructed two scores. The first was unrestricted, including all independent SNPs associated with the lipid trait identified from a prior meta-analysis (threshold P < 2 {\texttimes} 10(-6)); and the second a restricted score, filtered to remove any SNPs also associated with either of the other two lipid traits at P <= 0.01. Mendelian randomization meta-analyses were conducted in 17 studies including 62,199 participants and 12,099 CHD events. Both the unrestricted and restricted allele scores for LDL-C (42 and 19 SNPs, respectively) associated with CHD. For HDL-C, the unrestricted allele score (48 SNPs) was associated with CHD (OR: 0.53; 95\% CI: 0.40, 0.70), per 1 mmol/L higher HDL-C, but neither the restricted allele score (19 SNPs; OR: 0.91; 95\% CI: 0.42, 1.98) nor the unrestricted HDL-C allele score adjusted for triglycerides, LDL-C, or statin use (OR: 0.81; 95\% CI: 0.44, 1.46) showed a robust association. For triglycerides, the unrestricted allele score (67 SNPs) and the restricted allele score (27 SNPs) were both associated with CHD (OR: 1.62; 95\% CI: 1.24, 2.11 and 1.61; 95\% CI: 1.00, 2.59, respectively) per 1-log unit increment. However, the unrestricted triglyceride score adjusted for HDL-C, LDL-C, and statin use gave an OR for CHD of 1.01 (95\% CI: 0.59, 1.75).

CONCLUSION: The genetic findings support a causal effect of triglycerides on CHD risk, but a causal role for HDL-C, though possible, remains less certain.

}, keywords = {Case-Control Studies, Cholesterol, HDL, Coronary Artery Disease, Female, Gene Frequency, Genotype, Genotyping Techniques, Humans, Male, Mendelian Randomization Analysis, Middle Aged, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Risk Assessment, Triglycerides}, issn = {1522-9645}, doi = {10.1093/eurheartj/eht571}, author = {Holmes, Michael V and Asselbergs, Folkert W and Palmer, Tom M and Drenos, Fotios and Lanktree, Matthew B and Nelson, Christopher P and Dale, Caroline E and Padmanabhan, Sandosh and Finan, Chris and Swerdlow, Daniel I and Tragante, Vinicius and van Iperen, Erik P A and Sivapalaratnam, Suthesh and Shah, Sonia and Elbers, Clara C and Shah, Tina and Engmann, Jorgen and Giambartolomei, Claudia and White, Jon and Zabaneh, Delilah and Sofat, Reecha and McLachlan, Stela and Doevendans, Pieter A and Balmforth, Anthony J and Hall, Alistair S and North, Kari E and Almoguera, Berta and Hoogeveen, Ron C and Cushman, Mary and Fornage, Myriam and Patel, Sanjay R and Redline, Susan and Siscovick, David S and Tsai, Michael Y and Karczewski, Konrad J and Hofker, Marten H and Verschuren, W Monique and Bots, Michiel L and van der Schouw, Yvonne T and Melander, Olle and Dominiczak, Anna F and Morris, Richard and Ben-Shlomo, Yoav and Price, Jackie and Kumari, Meena and Baumert, Jens and Peters, Annette and Thorand, Barbara and Koenig, Wolfgang and Gaunt, Tom R and Humphries, Steve E and Clarke, Robert and Watkins, Hugh and Farrall, Martin and Wilson, James G and Rich, Stephen S and de Bakker, Paul I W and Lange, Leslie A and Davey Smith, George and Reiner, Alex P and Talmud, Philippa J and Kivimaki, Mika and Lawlor, Debbie A and Dudbridge, Frank and Samani, Nilesh J and Keating, Brendan J and Hingorani, Aroon D and Casas, Juan P} } @article {7594, title = {Association Between Telomere Length and Risk of Cancer and Non-Neoplastic Diseases: A Mendelian Randomization Study.}, journal = {JAMA Oncol}, volume = {3}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 May 01}, pages = {636-651}, abstract = {

Importance: The causal direction and magnitude of the association between telomere length and incidence of cancer and non-neoplastic diseases is uncertain owing to the susceptibility of observational studies to confounding and reverse causation.

Objective: To conduct a Mendelian randomization study, using germline genetic variants as instrumental variables, to appraise the causal relevance of telomere length for risk of cancer and non-neoplastic diseases.

Data Sources: Genomewide association studies (GWAS) published up to January 15, 2015.

Study Selection: GWAS of noncommunicable diseases that assayed germline genetic variation and did not select cohort or control participants on the basis of preexisting diseases. Of 163 GWAS of noncommunicable diseases identified, summary data from 103 were available.

Data Extraction and Synthesis: Summary association statistics for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that are strongly associated with telomere length in the general population.

Main Outcomes and Measures: Odds ratios (ORs) and 95\% confidence intervals (CIs) for disease per standard deviation (SD) higher telomere length due to germline genetic variation.

Results: Summary data were available for 35 cancers and 48 non-neoplastic diseases, corresponding to 420 081 cases (median cases, 2526 per disease) and 1 093 105 controls (median, 6789 per disease). Increased telomere length due to germline genetic variation was generally associated with increased risk for site-specific cancers. The strongest associations (ORs [95\% CIs] per 1-SD change in genetically increased telomere length) were observed for glioma, 5.27 (3.15-8.81); serous low-malignant-potential ovarian cancer, 4.35 (2.39-7.94); lung adenocarcinoma, 3.19 (2.40-4.22); neuroblastoma, 2.98 (1.92-4.62); bladder cancer, 2.19 (1.32-3.66); melanoma, 1.87 (1.55-2.26); testicular cancer, 1.76 (1.02-3.04); kidney cancer, 1.55 (1.08-2.23); and endometrial cancer, 1.31 (1.07-1.61). Associations were stronger for rarer cancers and at tissue sites with lower rates of stem cell division. There was generally little evidence of association between genetically increased telomere length and risk of psychiatric, autoimmune, inflammatory, diabetic, and other non-neoplastic diseases, except for coronary heart disease (OR, 0.78 [95\% CI, 0.67-0.90]), abdominal aortic aneurysm (OR, 0.63 [95\% CI, 0.49-0.81]), celiac disease (OR, 0.42 [95\% CI, 0.28-0.61]) and interstitial lung disease (OR, 0.09 [95\% CI, 0.05-0.15]).

Conclusions and Relevance: It is likely that longer telomeres increase risk for several cancers but reduce risk for some non-neoplastic diseases, including cardiovascular diseases.

}, keywords = {Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Germ-Line Mutation, Humans, Male, Mendelian Randomization Analysis, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Risk Assessment, Telomere, Telomere Homeostasis}, issn = {2374-2445}, doi = {10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5945}, author = {Haycock, Philip C and Burgess, Stephen and Nounu, Aayah and Zheng, Jie and Okoli, George N and Bowden, Jack and Wade, Kaitlin Hazel and Timpson, Nicholas J and Evans, David M and Willeit, Peter and Aviv, Abraham and Gaunt, Tom R and Hemani, Gibran and Mangino, Massimo and Ellis, Hayley Patricia and Kurian, Kathreena M and Pooley, Karen A and Eeles, Rosalind A and Lee, Jeffrey E and Fang, Shenying and Chen, Wei V and Law, Matthew H and Bowdler, Lisa M and Iles, Mark M and Yang, Qiong and Worrall, Bradford B and Markus, Hugh Stephen and Hung, Rayjean J and Amos, Chris I and Spurdle, Amanda B and Thompson, Deborah J and O{\textquoteright}Mara, Tracy A and Wolpin, Brian and Amundadottir, Laufey and Stolzenberg-Solomon, Rachael and Trichopoulou, Antonia and Onland-Moret, N Charlotte and Lund, Eiliv and Duell, Eric J and Canzian, Federico and Severi, Gianluca and Overvad, Kim and Gunter, Marc J and Tumino, Rosario and Svenson, Ulrika and van Rij, Andre and Baas, Annette F and Bown, Matthew J and Samani, Nilesh J and van t{\textquoteright}Hof, Femke N G and Tromp, Gerard and Jones, Gregory T and Kuivaniemi, Helena and Elmore, James R and Johansson, Mattias and Mckay, James and Scelo, Ghislaine and Carreras-Torres, Robert and Gaborieau, Valerie and Brennan, Paul and Bracci, Paige M and Neale, Rachel E and Olson, Sara H and Gallinger, Steven and Li, Donghui and Petersen, Gloria M and Risch, Harvey A and Klein, Alison P and Han, Jiali and Abnet, Christian C and Freedman, Neal D and Taylor, Philip R and Maris, John M and Aben, Katja K and Kiemeney, Lambertus A and Vermeulen, Sita H and Wiencke, John K and Walsh, Kyle M and Wrensch, Margaret and Rice, Terri and Turnbull, Clare and Litchfield, Kevin and Paternoster, Lavinia and Standl, Marie and Abecasis, Goncalo R and SanGiovanni, John Paul and Li, Yong and Mijatovic, Vladan and Sapkota, Yadav and Low, Siew-Kee and Zondervan, Krina T and Montgomery, Grant W and Nyholt, Dale R and van Heel, David A and Hunt, Karen and Arking, Dan E and Ashar, Foram N and Sotoodehnia, Nona and Woo, Daniel and Rosand, Jonathan and Comeau, Mary E and Brown, W Mark and Silverman, Edwin K and Hokanson, John E and Cho, Michael H and Hui, Jennie and Ferreira, Manuel A and Thompson, Philip J and Morrison, Alanna C and Felix, Janine F and Smith, Nicholas L and Christiano, Angela M and Petukhova, Lynn and Betz, Regina C and Fan, Xing and Zhang, Xuejun and Zhu, Caihong and Langefeld, Carl D and Thompson, Susan D and Wang, Feijie and Lin, Xu and Schwartz, David A and Fingerlin, Tasha and Rotter, Jerome I and Cotch, Mary Frances and Jensen, Richard A and Munz, Matthias and Dommisch, Henrik and Schaefer, Arne S and Han, Fang and Ollila, Hanna M and Hillary, Ryan P and Albagha, Omar and Ralston, Stuart H and Zeng, Chenjie and Zheng, Wei and Shu, Xiao-Ou and Reis, Andre and Uebe, Steffen and H{\"u}ffmeier, Ulrike and Kawamura, Yoshiya and Otowa, Takeshi and Sasaki, Tsukasa and Hibberd, Martin Lloyd and Davila, Sonia and Xie, Gang and Siminovitch, Katherine and Bei, Jin-Xin and Zeng, Yi-Xin and F{\"o}rsti, Asta and Chen, Bowang and Landi, Stefano and Franke, Andre and Fischer, Annegret and Ellinghaus, David and Flores, Carlos and Noth, Imre and Ma, Shwu-Fan and Foo, Jia Nee and Liu, Jianjun and Kim, Jong-Won and Cox, David G and Delattre, Olivier and Mirabeau, Olivier and Skibola, Christine F and Tang, Clara S and Garcia-Barcelo, Merce and Chang, Kai-Ping and Su, Wen-Hui and Chang, Yu-Sun and Martin, Nicholas G and Gordon, Scott and Wade, Tracey D and Lee, Chaeyoung and Kubo, Michiaki and Cha, Pei-Chieng and Nakamura, Yusuke and Levy, Daniel and Kimura, Masayuki and Hwang, Shih-Jen and Hunt, Steven and Spector, Tim and Soranzo, Nicole and Manichaikul, Ani W and Barr, R Graham and Kahali, Bratati and Speliotes, Elizabeth and Yerges-Armstrong, Laura M and Cheng, Ching-Yu and Jonas, Jost B and Wong, Tien Yin and Fogh, Isabella and Lin, Kuang and Powell, John F and Rice, Kenneth and Relton, Caroline L and Martin, Richard M and Davey Smith, George} }