@article {6360, title = {Multiancestral analysis of inflammation-related genetic variants and C-reactive protein in the population architecture using genomics and epidemiology study.}, journal = {Circ Cardiovasc Genet}, volume = {7}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Apr}, pages = {178-88}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: C-reactive protein (CRP) is a biomarker of inflammation. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with CRP concentrations and inflammation-related traits such as cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and obesity. We aimed to replicate previous CRP-SNP associations, assess whether these associations generalize to additional race/ethnicity groups, and evaluate inflammation-related SNPs for a potentially pleiotropic association with CRP.

METHODS AND RESULTS: We selected and analyzed 16 CRP-associated and 250 inflammation-related GWAS SNPs among 40 473 African American, American Indian, Asian/Pacific Islander, European American, and Hispanic participants from 7 studies collaborating in the Population Architecture using Genomics and Epidemiology (PAGE) study. Fixed-effect meta-analyses combined study-specific race/ethnicity-stratified linear regression estimates to evaluate the association between each SNP and high-sensitivity CRP. Overall, 18 SNPs in 8 loci were significantly associated with CRP (Bonferroni-corrected P<3.1{\texttimes}10(-3) for replication, P<2.0{\texttimes}10(-4) for pleiotropy): Seven of these were specific to European Americans, while 9 additionally generalized to African Americans (1), Hispanics (5), or both (3); 1 SNP was seen only in African Americans and Hispanics. Two SNPs in the CELSR2/PSRC1/SORT1 locus showed a potentially novel association with CRP: rs599839 (P=2.0{\texttimes}10(-6)) and rs646776 (P=3.1{\texttimes}10(-5)).

CONCLUSIONS: We replicated 16 SNP-CRP associations, 10 of which generalized to African Americans and/or Hispanics. We also identified potentially novel pleiotropic associations with CRP for two SNPs previously associated with coronary artery disease and/or low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol. These findings demonstrate the benefit of evaluating genotype-phenotype associations in multiple race/ethnicity groups and looking for pleiotropic relationships among SNPs previously associated with related phenotypes.

}, keywords = {Adult, African Continental Ancestry Group, Aged, Asian Continental Ancestry Group, C-Reactive Protein, Female, Genetic Variation, Genome-Wide Association Study, Hispanic Americans, Humans, Indians, North American, Inflammation, Male, Middle Aged, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, United States, Young Adult}, issn = {1942-3268}, doi = {10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.113.000173}, author = {Kocarnik, Jonathan M and Pendergrass, Sarah A and Carty, Cara L and Pankow, James S and Schumacher, Fredrick R and Cheng, Iona and Durda, Peter and Ambite, Jose Luis and Deelman, Ewa and Cook, Nancy R and Liu, Simin and Wactawski-Wende, Jean and Hutter, Carolyn and Brown-Gentry, Kristin and Wilson, Sarah and Best, Lyle G and Pankratz, Nathan and Hong, Ching-Ping and Cole, Shelley A and Voruganti, V Saroja and B{\r u}zkov{\'a}, Petra and Jorgensen, Neal W and Jenny, Nancy S and Wilkens, Lynne R and Haiman, Christopher A and Kolonel, Laurence N and LaCroix, Andrea and North, Kari and Jackson, Rebecca and Le Marchand, Lo{\"\i}c and Hindorff, Lucia A and Crawford, Dana C and Gross, Myron and Peters, Ulrike} } @article {7923, title = {Equalization of four cardiovascular risk algorithms after systematic recalibration: individual-participant meta-analysis of 86 prospective studies.}, journal = {Eur Heart J}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Nov 22}, abstract = {

Aims: There is debate about the optimum algorithm for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk estimation. We conducted head-to-head comparisons of four algorithms recommended by primary prevention guidelines, before and after {\textquoteright}recalibration{\textquoteright}, a method that adapts risk algorithms to take account of differences in the risk characteristics of the populations being studied.

Methods and results: Using individual-participant data on 360 737 participants without CVD at baseline in 86 prospective studies from 22 countries, we compared the Framingham risk score (FRS), Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE), pooled cohort equations (PCE), and Reynolds risk score (RRS). We calculated measures of risk discrimination and calibration, and modelled clinical implications of initiating statin therapy in people judged to be at {\textquoteright}high{\textquoteright} 10 year CVD risk. Original risk algorithms were recalibrated using the risk factor profile and CVD incidence of target populations. The four algorithms had similar risk discrimination. Before recalibration, FRS, SCORE, and PCE over-predicted CVD risk on average by 10\%, 52\%, and 41\%, respectively, whereas RRS under-predicted by 10\%. Original versions of algorithms classified 29-39\% of individuals aged >=40 years as high risk. By contrast, recalibration reduced this proportion to 22-24\% for every algorithm. We estimated that to prevent one CVD event, it would be necessary to initiate statin therapy in 44-51 such individuals using original algorithms, in contrast to 37-39 individuals with recalibrated algorithms.

Conclusion: Before recalibration, the clinical performance of four widely used CVD risk algorithms varied substantially. By contrast, simple recalibration nearly equalized their performance and improved modelled targeting of preventive action to clinical need.

}, issn = {1522-9645}, doi = {10.1093/eurheartj/ehy653}, author = {Pennells, Lisa and Kaptoge, Stephen and Wood, Angela and Sweeting, Mike and Zhao, Xiaohui and White, Ian and Burgess, Stephen and Willeit, Peter and Bolton, Thomas and Moons, Karel G M and van der Schouw, Yvonne T and Selmer, Randi and Khaw, Kay-Tee and Gudnason, Vilmundur and Assmann, Gerd and Amouyel, Philippe and Salomaa, Veikko and Kivimaki, Mika and Nordestgaard, B{\o}rge G and Blaha, Michael J and Kuller, Lewis H and Brenner, Hermann and Gillum, Richard F and Meisinger, Christa and Ford, Ian and Knuiman, Matthew W and Rosengren, Annika and Lawlor, Debbie A and V{\"o}lzke, Henry and Cooper, Cyrus and Mar{\'\i}n Iba{\~n}ez, Alejandro and Casiglia, Edoardo and Kauhanen, Jussi and Cooper, Jackie A and Rodriguez, Beatriz and Sundstr{\"o}m, Johan and Barrett-Connor, Elizabeth and Dankner, Rachel and Nietert, Paul J and Davidson, Karina W and Wallace, Robert B and Blazer, Dan G and Bj{\"o}rkelund, Cecilia and Donfrancesco, Chiara and Krumholz, Harlan M and Nissinen, Aulikki and Davis, Barry R and Coady, Sean and Whincup, Peter H and J{\o}rgensen, Torben and Ducimetiere, Pierre and Trevisan, Maurizio and Engstr{\"o}m, Gunnar and Crespo, Carlos J and Meade, Tom W and Visser, Marjolein and Kromhout, Daan and Kiechl, Stefan and Daimon, Makoto and Price, Jackie F and G{\'o}mez de la C{\'a}mara, Agustin and Wouter Jukema, J and Lamarche, Beno{\^\i}t and Onat, Altan and Simons, Leon A and Kavousi, Maryam and Ben-Shlomo, Yoav and Gallacher, John and Dekker, Jacqueline M and Arima, Hisatomi and Shara, Nawar and Tipping, Robert W and Roussel, Ronan and Brunner, Eric J and Koenig, Wolfgang and Sakurai, Masaru and Pavlovic, Jelena and Gansevoort, Ron T and Nagel, Dorothea and Goldbourt, Uri and Barr, Elizabeth L M and Palmieri, Luigi and Nj{\o}lstad, Inger and Sato, Shinichi and Monique Verschuren, W M and Varghese, Cherian V and Graham, Ian and Onuma, Oyere and Greenland, Philip and Woodward, Mark and Ezzati, Majid and Psaty, Bruce M and Sattar, Naveed and Jackson, Rod and Ridker, Paul M and Cook, Nancy R and D{\textquoteright}Agostino, Ralph B and Thompson, Simon G and Danesh, John and Di Angelantonio, Emanuele} }