@article {6815, title = {Association of Alzheimer{\textquoteright}s disease GWAS loci with MRI markers of brain aging.}, journal = {Neurobiol Aging}, volume = {36}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Apr}, pages = {1765.e7-16}, abstract = {

Whether novel risk variants of Alzheimer{\textquoteright}s disease (AD) identified through genome-wide association studies also influence magnetic resonance imaging-based intermediate phenotypes of AD in the general population is unclear. We studied association of 24 AD risk loci with intracranial volume, total brain volume, hippocampal volume (HV), white matter hyperintensity burden, and brain infarcts in a meta-analysis of genetic association studies from large population-based samples (N = 8175-11,550). In single-SNP based tests, AD risk allele of APOE (rs2075650) was associated with smaller HV (p = 0.0054) and CD33 (rs3865444) with smaller intracranial volume (p = 0.0058). In gene-based tests, there was associations of HLA-DRB1 with total brain volume (p = 0.0006) and BIN1 with HV (p = 0.00089). A weighted AD genetic risk score was associated with smaller HV (beta {\textpm} SE = -0.047 {\textpm} 0.013, p = 0.00041), even after excluding the APOE locus (p = 0.029). However, only association of AD genetic risk score with HV, including APOE, was significant after multiple testing correction (including number of independent phenotypes tested). These results suggest that novel AD genetic risk variants may contribute to structural brain aging in nondemented older community persons.

}, keywords = {Aging, Alleles, Alzheimer Disease, Apolipoproteins E, Brain, Female, Genome-Wide Association Study, Hippocampus, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Organ Size, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Risk, Sialic Acid Binding Ig-like Lectin 3}, issn = {1558-1497}, doi = {10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.12.028}, author = {Chauhan, Ganesh and Adams, Hieab H H and Bis, Joshua C and Weinstein, Galit and Yu, Lei and T{\"o}glhofer, Anna Maria and Smith, Albert Vernon and van der Lee, Sven J and Gottesman, Rebecca F and Thomson, Russell and Wang, Jing and Yang, Qiong and Niessen, Wiro J and Lopez, Oscar L and Becker, James T and Phan, Thanh G and Beare, Richard J and Arfanakis, Konstantinos and Fleischman, Debra and Vernooij, Meike W and Mazoyer, Bernard and Schmidt, Helena and Srikanth, Velandai and Knopman, David S and Jack, Clifford R and Amouyel, Philippe and Hofman, Albert and DeCarli, Charles and Tzourio, Christophe and van Duijn, Cornelia M and Bennett, David A and Schmidt, Reinhold and Longstreth, William T and Mosley, Thomas H and Fornage, Myriam and Launer, Lenore J and Seshadri, Sudha and Ikram, M Arfan and Debette, Stephanie} } @article {6684, title = {Genome-wide studies of verbal declarative memory in nondemented older people: the Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology consortium.}, journal = {Biol Psychiatry}, volume = {77}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Apr 15}, pages = {749-63}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Memory performance in older persons can reflect genetic influences on cognitive function and dementing processes. We aimed to identify genetic contributions to verbal declarative memory in a community setting.

METHODS: We conducted genome-wide association studies for paragraph or word list delayed recall in 19 cohorts from the Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology consortium, comprising 29,076 dementia- and stroke-free individuals of European descent, aged >=45 years. Replication of suggestive associations (p < 5 {\texttimes} 10(-6)) was sought in 10,617 participants of European descent, 3811 African-Americans, and 1561 young adults.

RESULTS: rs4420638, near APOE, was associated with poorer delayed recall performance in discovery (p = 5.57 {\texttimes} 10(-10)) and replication cohorts (p = 5.65 {\texttimes} 10(-8)). This association was stronger for paragraph than word list delayed recall and in the oldest persons. Two associations with specific tests, in subsets of the total sample, reached genome-wide significance in combined analyses of discovery and replication (rs11074779 [HS3ST4], p = 3.11 {\texttimes} 10(-8), and rs6813517 [SPOCK3], p = 2.58 {\texttimes} 10(-8)) near genes involved in immune response. A genetic score combining 58 independent suggestive memory risk variants was associated with increasing Alzheimer disease pathology in 725 autopsy samples. Association of memory risk loci with gene expression in 138 human hippocampus samples showed cis-associations with WDR48 and CLDN5, both related to ubiquitin metabolism.

CONCLUSIONS: This largest study to date exploring the genetics of memory function in ~40,000 older individuals revealed genome-wide associations and suggested an involvement of immune and ubiquitin pathways.

}, keywords = {Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Apolipoproteins E, Claudin-5, Cohort Studies, Female, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genotype, Humans, Male, Memory Disorders, Middle Aged, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Proteins, Proteoglycans, Regression Analysis, Sulfotransferases, Verbal Learning}, issn = {1873-2402}, doi = {10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.08.027}, author = {Debette, Stephanie and Ibrahim Verbaas, Carla A and Bressler, Jan and Schuur, Maaike and Smith, Albert and Bis, Joshua C and Davies, Gail and Wolf, Christiane and Gudnason, Vilmundur and Chibnik, Lori B and Yang, Qiong and DeStefano, Anita L and de Quervain, Dominique J F and Srikanth, Velandai and Lahti, Jari and Grabe, Hans J and Smith, Jennifer A and Priebe, Lutz and Yu, Lei and Karbalai, Nazanin and Hayward, Caroline and Wilson, James F and Campbell, Harry and Petrovic, Katja and Fornage, Myriam and Chauhan, Ganesh and Yeo, Robin and Boxall, Ruth and Becker, James and Stegle, Oliver and Mather, Karen A and Chouraki, Vincent and Sun, Qi and Rose, Lynda M and Resnick, Susan and Oldmeadow, Christopher and Kirin, Mirna and Wright, Alan F and Jonsdottir, Maria K and Au, Rhoda and Becker, Albert and Amin, Najaf and Nalls, Mike A and Turner, Stephen T and Kardia, Sharon L R and Oostra, Ben and Windham, Gwen and Coker, Laura H and Zhao, Wei and Knopman, David S and Heiss, Gerardo and Griswold, Michael E and Gottesman, Rebecca F and Vitart, Veronique and Hastie, Nicholas D and Zgaga, Lina and Rudan, Igor and Polasek, Ozren and Holliday, Elizabeth G and Schofield, Peter and Choi, Seung Hoan and Tanaka, Toshiko and An, Yang and Perry, Rodney T and Kennedy, Richard E and Sale, Mich{\`e}le M and Wang, Jing and Wadley, Virginia G and Liewald, David C and Ridker, Paul M and Gow, Alan J and Pattie, Alison and Starr, John M and Porteous, David and Liu, Xuan and Thomson, Russell and Armstrong, Nicola J and Eiriksdottir, Gudny and Assareh, Arezoo A and Kochan, Nicole A and Widen, Elisabeth and Palotie, Aarno and Hsieh, Yi-Chen and Eriksson, Johan G and Vogler, Christian and van Swieten, John C and Shulman, Joshua M and Beiser, Alexa and Rotter, Jerome and Schmidt, Carsten O and Hoffmann, Wolfgang and N{\"o}then, Markus M and Ferrucci, Luigi and Attia, John and Uitterlinden, Andr{\'e} G and Amouyel, Philippe and Dartigues, Jean-Fran{\c c}ois and Amieva, H{\'e}l{\`e}ne and R{\"a}ikk{\"o}nen, Katri and Garcia, Melissa and Wolf, Philip A and Hofman, Albert and Longstreth, W T and Psaty, Bruce M and Boerwinkle, Eric and DeJager, Philip L and Sachdev, Perminder S and Schmidt, Reinhold and Breteler, Monique M B and Teumer, Alexander and Lopez, Oscar L and Cichon, Sven and Chasman, Daniel I and Grodstein, Francine and M{\"u}ller-Myhsok, Bertram and Tzourio, Christophe and Papassotiropoulos, Andreas and Bennett, David A and Ikram, M Arfan and Deary, Ian J and van Duijn, Cornelia M and Launer, Lenore and Fitzpatrick, Annette L and Seshadri, Sudha and Mosley, Thomas H} } @article {6861, title = {White Matter Lesion Progression: Genome-Wide Search for Genetic Influences.}, journal = {Stroke}, volume = {46}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Nov}, pages = {3048-57}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: White matter lesion (WML) progression on magnetic resonance imaging is related to cognitive decline and stroke, but its determinants besides baseline WML burden are largely unknown. Here, we estimated heritability of WML progression, and sought common genetic variants associated with WML progression in elderly participants from the Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology (CHARGE) consortium.

METHODS: Heritability of WML progression was calculated in the Framingham Heart Study. The genome-wide association study included 7773 elderly participants from 10 cohorts. To assess the relative contribution of genetic factors to progression of WML, we compared in 7 cohorts risk models including demographics, vascular risk factors plus single-nucleotide polymorphisms that have been shown to be associated cross-sectionally with WML in the current and previous association studies.

RESULTS: A total of 1085 subjects showed WML progression. The heritability estimate for WML progression was low at 6.5\%, and no single-nucleotide polymorphisms achieved genome-wide significance (P<5{\texttimes}10(-8)). Four loci were suggestive (P<1{\texttimes}10(-5)) of an association with WML progression: 10q24.32 (rs10883817, P=1.46{\texttimes}10(-6)); 12q13.13 (rs4761974, P=8.71{\texttimes}10(-7)); 20p12.1 (rs6135309, P=3.69{\texttimes}10(-6)); and 4p15.31 (rs7664442, P=2.26{\texttimes}10(-6)). Variants that have been previously related to WML explained only 0.8\% to 11.7\% more of the variance in WML progression than age, vascular risk factors, and baseline WML burden.

CONCLUSIONS: Common genetic factors contribute little to the progression of age-related WML in middle-aged and older adults. Future research on determinants of WML progression should focus more on environmental, lifestyle, or host-related biological factors.

}, keywords = {Adult, Aged, Cohort Studies, Disease Progression, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Leukoencephalopathies, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, White Matter}, issn = {1524-4628}, doi = {10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009252}, author = {Hofer, Edith and Cavalieri, Margherita and Bis, Joshua C and DeCarli, Charles and Fornage, Myriam and Sigurdsson, Sigurdur and Srikanth, Velandai and Trompet, Stella and Verhaaren, Benjamin F J and Wolf, Christiane and Yang, Qiong and Adams, Hieab H H and Amouyel, Philippe and Beiser, Alexa and Buckley, Brendan M and Callisaya, Michele and Chauhan, Ganesh and de Craen, Anton J M and Dufouil, Carole and van Duijn, Cornelia M and Ford, Ian and Freudenberger, Paul and Gottesman, Rebecca F and Gudnason, Vilmundur and Heiss, Gerardo and Hofman, Albert and Lumley, Thomas and Martinez, Oliver and Mazoyer, Bernard and Moran, Chris and Niessen, Wiro J and Phan, Thanh and Psaty, Bruce M and Satizabal, Claudia L and Sattar, Naveed and Schilling, Sabrina and Shibata, Dean K and Slagboom, P Eline and Smith, Albert and Stott, David J and Taylor, Kent D and Thomson, Russell and T{\"o}glhofer, Anna M and Tzourio, Christophe and van Buchem, Mark and Wang, Jing and Westendorp, Rudi G J and Windham, B Gwen and Vernooij, Meike W and Zijdenbos, Alex and Beare, Richard and Debette, Stephanie and Ikram, M Arfan and Jukema, J Wouter and Launer, Lenore J and Longstreth, W T and Mosley, Thomas H and Seshadri, Sudha and Schmidt, Helena and Schmidt, Reinhold} }