@article {6844, title = {Consumption of meat is associated with higher fasting glucose and insulin concentrations regardless of glucose and insulin genetic risk scores: a meta-analysis of 50,345 Caucasians.}, journal = {Am J Clin Nutr}, volume = {102}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Nov}, pages = {1266-78}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest that meat intake is associated with diabetes-related phenotypes. However, whether the associations of meat intake and glucose and insulin homeostasis are modified by genes related to glucose and insulin is unknown.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the associations of meat intake and the interaction of meat with genotype on fasting glucose and insulin concentrations in Caucasians free of diabetes mellitus.

DESIGN: Fourteen studies that are part of the Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology consortium participated in the analysis. Data were provided for up to 50,345 participants. Using linear regression within studies and a fixed-effects meta-analysis across studies, we examined 1) the associations of processed meat and unprocessed red meat intake with fasting glucose and insulin concentrations; and 2) the interactions of processed meat and unprocessed red meat with genetic risk score related to fasting glucose or insulin resistance on fasting glucose and insulin concentrations.

RESULTS: Processed meat was associated with higher fasting glucose, and unprocessed red meat was associated with both higher fasting glucose and fasting insulin concentrations after adjustment for potential confounders [not including body mass index (BMI)]. For every additional 50-g serving of processed meat per day, fasting glucose was 0.021 mmol/L (95\% CI: 0.011, 0.030 mmol/L) higher. Every additional 100-g serving of unprocessed red meat per day was associated with a 0.037-mmol/L (95\% CI: 0.023, 0.051-mmol/L) higher fasting glucose concentration and a 0.049-ln-pmol/L (95\% CI: 0.035, 0.063-ln-pmol/L) higher fasting insulin concentration. After additional adjustment for BMI, observed associations were attenuated and no longer statistically significant. The association of processed meat and fasting insulin did not reach statistical significance after correction for multiple comparisons. Observed associations were not modified by genetic loci known to influence fasting glucose or insulin resistance.

CONCLUSION: The association of higher fasting glucose and insulin concentrations with meat consumption was not modified by an index of glucose- and insulin-related single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Six of the participating studies are registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT0000513 (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities), NCT00149435 (Cardiovascular Health Study), NCT00005136 (Family Heart Study), NCT00005121 (Framingham Heart Study), NCT00083369 (Genetics of Lipid Lowering Drugs and Diet Network), and NCT00005487 (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis).

}, keywords = {Blood Glucose, Cohort Studies, Genetic Association Studies, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Hyperinsulinism, Insulin, Insulin Resistance, Insulin-Secreting Cells, Meat, Meat Products, Middle Aged, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Risk Factors}, issn = {1938-3207}, doi = {10.3945/ajcn.114.101238}, author = {Fretts, Amanda M and Follis, Jack L and Nettleton, Jennifer A and Lemaitre, Rozenn N and Ngwa, Julius S and Wojczynski, Mary K and Kalafati, Ioanna Panagiota and Varga, Tibor V and Frazier-Wood, Alexis C and Houston, Denise K and Lahti, Jari and Ericson, Ulrika and van den Hooven, Edith H and Mikkil{\"a}, Vera and Kiefte-de Jong, Jessica C and Mozaffarian, Dariush and Rice, Kenneth and Renstrom, Frida and North, Kari E and McKeown, Nicola M and Feitosa, Mary F and Kanoni, Stavroula and Smith, Caren E and Garcia, Melissa E and Tiainen, Anna-Maija and Sonestedt, Emily and Manichaikul, Ani and van Rooij, Frank J A and Dimitriou, Maria and Raitakari, Olli and Pankow, James S and Djouss{\'e}, Luc and Province, Michael A and Hu, Frank B and Lai, Chao-Qiang and Keller, Margaux F and Per{\"a}l{\"a}, Mia-Maria and Rotter, Jerome I and Hofman, Albert and Graff, Misa and K{\"a}h{\"o}nen, Mika and Mukamal, Kenneth and Johansson, Ingegerd and Ordovas, Jose M and Liu, Yongmei and M{\"a}nnist{\"o}, Satu and Uitterlinden, Andr{\'e} G and Deloukas, Panos and Sepp{\"a}l{\"a}, Ilkka and Psaty, Bruce M and Cupples, L Adrienne and Borecki, Ingrid B and Franks, Paul W and Arnett, Donna K and Nalls, Mike A and Eriksson, Johan G and Orho-Melander, Marju and Franco, Oscar H and Lehtim{\"a}ki, Terho and Dedoussis, George V and Meigs, James B and Siscovick, David S} } @article {6802, title = {Gene {\texttimes} dietary pattern interactions in obesity: analysis of up to 68 317 adults of European ancestry.}, journal = {Hum Mol Genet}, volume = {24}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Aug 15}, pages = {4728-38}, abstract = {

Obesity is highly heritable. Genetic variants showing robust associations with obesity traits have been identified through genome-wide association studies. We investigated whether a composite score representing healthy diet modifies associations of these variants with obesity traits. Totally, 32 body mass index (BMI)- and 14 waist-hip ratio (WHR)-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms were genotyped, and genetic risk scores (GRS) were calculated in 18 cohorts of European ancestry (n = 68 317). Diet score was calculated based on self-reported intakes of whole grains, fish, fruits, vegetables, nuts/seeds (favorable) and red/processed meats, sweets, sugar-sweetened beverages and fried potatoes (unfavorable). Multivariable adjusted, linear regression within each cohort followed by inverse variance-weighted, fixed-effects meta-analysis was used to characterize: (a) associations of each GRS with BMI and BMI-adjusted WHR~and (b) diet score modification of genetic associations with BMI and BMI-adjusted WHR. Nominally significant interactions (P = 0.006-0.04) were observed between the diet score and WHR-GRS (but not BMI-GRS), two WHR loci (GRB14 rs10195252; LYPLAL1 rs4846567) and two BMI loci (LRRN6C rs10968576; MTIF3 rs4771122), for the respective BMI-adjusted WHR or BMI outcomes. Although the magnitudes of these select interactions were small, our data indicated that associations between genetic predisposition and obesity traits were stronger with a healthier diet. Our findings generate interesting hypotheses; however, experimental and functional studies are needed to determine their clinical relevance.

}, keywords = {Adult, Body Mass Index, Case-Control Studies, Diet, Western, Epistasis, Genetic, European Continental Ancestry Group, Female, Genetic Loci, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Male, Obesity, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide}, issn = {1460-2083}, doi = {10.1093/hmg/ddv186}, author = {Nettleton, Jennifer A and Follis, Jack L and Ngwa, Julius S and Smith, Caren E and Ahmad, Shafqat and Tanaka, Toshiko and Wojczynski, Mary K and Voortman, Trudy and Lemaitre, Rozenn N and Kristiansson, Kati and Nuotio, Marja-Liisa and Houston, Denise K and Per{\"a}l{\"a}, Mia-Maria and Qi, Qibin and Sonestedt, Emily and Manichaikul, Ani and Kanoni, Stavroula and Ganna, Andrea and Mikkil{\"a}, Vera and North, Kari E and Siscovick, David S and Harald, Kennet and McKeown, Nicola M and Johansson, Ingegerd and Rissanen, Harri and Liu, Yongmei and Lahti, Jari and Hu, Frank B and Bandinelli, Stefania and Rukh, Gull and Rich, Stephen and Booij, Lisanne and Dmitriou, Maria and Ax, Erika and Raitakari, Olli and Mukamal, Kenneth and M{\"a}nnist{\"o}, Satu and Hallmans, G{\"o}ran and Jula, Antti and Ericson, Ulrika and Jacobs, David R and van Rooij, Frank J A and Deloukas, Panos and Sjogren, Per and K{\"a}h{\"o}nen, Mika and Djouss{\'e}, Luc and Perola, Markus and Barroso, In{\^e}s and Hofman, Albert and Stirrups, Kathleen and Viikari, Jorma and Uitterlinden, Andr{\'e} G and Kalafati, Ioanna P and Franco, Oscar H and Mozaffarian, Dariush and Salomaa, Veikko and Borecki, Ingrid B and Knekt, Paul and Kritchevsky, Stephen B and Eriksson, Johan G and Dedoussis, George V and Qi, Lu and Ferrucci, Luigi and Orho-Melander, Marju and Zillikens, M Carola and Ingelsson, Erik and Lehtim{\"a}ki, Terho and Renstrom, Frida and Cupples, L Adrienne and Loos, Ruth J F and Franks, Paul W} } @article {7588, title = {Genome-Wide Interactions with Dairy Intake for Body Mass Index in Adults of European Descent.}, journal = {Mol Nutr Food Res}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Sep 21}, abstract = {

SCOPE: Body weight responds variably to the intake of dairy foods. Genetic variation may contribute to inter-individual variability in associations between body weight and dairy consumption.

METHODS AND RESULTS: A genome-wide interaction study to discover genetic variants that account for variation in BMI in the context of low-fat, high-fat and total dairy intake in cross-sectional analysis was conducted. Data from nine discovery studies (up to 25 513 European descent individuals) were meta-analyzed. Twenty-six genetic variants reached the selected significance threshold (p-interaction <10-7) , and six independent variants (LINC01512-rs7751666, PALM2/AKAP2-rs914359, ACTA2-rs1388, PPP1R12A-rs7961195, LINC00333-rs9635058, AC098847.1-rs1791355) were evaluated meta-analytically for replication of interaction in up to 17 675 individuals. Variant rs9635058 (128 kb 3{\textquoteright} of LINC00333) was replicated (p-interaction = 0.004). In the discovery cohorts, rs9635058 interacted with dairy (p-interaction = 7.36 {\texttimes} 10-8) such that each serving of low-fat dairy was associated with 0.225 kg m-2 lower BMI per each additional copy of the effect allele (A). A second genetic variant (ACTA2-rs1388) approached interaction replication significance for low-fat dairy exposure.

CONCLUSION: Body weight responses to dairy intake may be modified by genotype, in that greater dairy intake may protect a genetic subgroup from higher body weight.

}, issn = {1613-4133}, doi = {10.1002/mnfr.201700347}, author = {Smith, Caren E and Follis, Jack L and Dashti, Hassan S and Tanaka, Toshiko and Graff, Mariaelisa and Fretts, Amanda M and Kilpel{\"a}inen, Tuomas O and Wojczynski, Mary K and Richardson, Kris and Nalls, Mike A and Schulz, Christina-Alexandra and Liu, Yongmei and Frazier-Wood, Alexis C and van Eekelen, Esther and Wang, Carol and de Vries, Paul S and Mikkil{\"a}, Vera and Rohde, Rebecca and Psaty, Bruce M and Hansen, Torben and Feitosa, Mary F and Lai, Chao-Qiang and Houston, Denise K and Ferruci, Luigi and Ericson, Ulrika and Wang, Zhe and de Mutsert, Ren{\'e}e and Oddy, Wendy H and de Jonge, Ester A L and Sepp{\"a}l{\"a}, Ilkka and Justice, Anne E and Lemaitre, Rozenn N and S{\o}rensen, Thorkild I A and Province, Michael A and Parnell, Laurence D and Garcia, Melissa E and Bandinelli, Stefania and Orho-Melander, Marju and Rich, Stephen S and Rosendaal, Frits R and Pennell, Craig E and Kiefte-de Jong, Jessica C and K{\"a}h{\"o}nen, Mika and Young, Kristin L and Pedersen, Oluf and Aslibekyan, Stella and Rotter, Jerome I and Mook-Kanamori, Dennis O and Zillikens, M Carola and Raitakari, Olli T and North, Kari E and Overvad, Kim and Arnett, Donna K and Hofman, Albert and Lehtim{\"a}ki, Terho and Tj{\o}nneland, Anne and Uitterlinden, Andr{\'e} G and Rivadeneira, Fernando and Franco, Oscar H and German, J Bruce and Siscovick, David S and Cupples, L Adrienne and Ordovas, Jose M} } @article {7576, title = {Sugar-sweetened beverage intake associations with fasting glucose and insulin concentrations are not modified by selected genetic variants in a ChREBP-FGF21 pathway: a meta-analysis.}, journal = {Diabetologia}, volume = {61}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Feb}, pages = {317-330}, abstract = {

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) are a major dietary contributor to fructose intake. A molecular pathway involving the carbohydrate responsive element-binding protein (ChREBP) and the metabolic hormone fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) may influence sugar metabolism and, thereby, contribute to fructose-induced metabolic disease. We hypothesise that common variants in 11 genes involved in fructose metabolism and the ChREBP-FGF21 pathway may interact with SSB intake to exacerbate positive associations between higher SSB intake and glycaemic traits.

METHODS: Data from 11 cohorts (six discovery and five replication) in the CHARGE (Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology) Consortium provided association and interaction results from 34,748 adults of European descent. SSB intake (soft drinks, fruit punches, lemonades or other fruit drinks) was derived from food-frequency questionnaires and food diaries. In fixed-effects meta-analyses, we quantified: (1) the associations between SSBs and glycaemic traits (fasting glucose and fasting insulin); and (2) the interactions between SSBs and 18 independent SNPs related to the ChREBP-FGF21 pathway.

RESULTS: In our combined meta-analyses of discovery and replication cohorts, after adjustment for age, sex, energy intake, BMI and other dietary covariates, each additional serving of SSB intake was associated with higher fasting glucose (β~{\textpm}~SE 0.014~{\textpm}~0.004 [mmol/l], p~=~1.5~{\texttimes}~10-3) and higher fasting insulin (0.030~{\textpm}~0.005 [log e pmol/l], p~=~2.0~{\texttimes}~10-10). No significant interactions on glycaemic traits were observed between SSB intake and selected SNPs. While a suggestive interaction was observed in the discovery cohorts with a SNP (rs1542423) in the β-Klotho (KLB) locus on fasting insulin (0.030~{\textpm}~0.011 log e pmol/l, uncorrected p~=~0.006), results in the replication cohorts and combined meta-analyses were non-significant.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: In this large meta-analysis, we observed that SSB intake was associated with higher fasting glucose and insulin. Although a suggestive interaction with a genetic variant in the ChREBP-FGF21 pathway was observed in the discovery cohorts, this observation was not confirmed in the replication analysis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trials related to this study were registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00005131 (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities), NCT00005133 (Cardiovascular Health Study), NCT00005121 (Framingham Offspring Study), NCT00005487 (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) and NCT00005152 (Nurses{\textquoteright} Health Study).

}, issn = {1432-0428}, doi = {10.1007/s00125-017-4475-0}, author = {McKeown, Nicola M and Dashti, Hassan S and Ma, Jiantao and Haslam, Danielle E and Kiefte-de Jong, Jessica C and Smith, Caren E and Tanaka, Toshiko and Graff, Mariaelisa and Lemaitre, Rozenn N and Rybin, Denis and Sonestedt, Emily and Frazier-Wood, Alexis C and Mook-Kanamori, Dennis O and Li, Yanping and Wang, Carol A and Leermakers, Elisabeth T M and Mikkil{\"a}, Vera and Young, Kristin L and Mukamal, Kenneth J and Cupples, L Adrienne and Schulz, Christina-Alexandra and Chen, Tzu-An and Li-Gao, Ruifang and Huang, Tao and Oddy, Wendy H and Raitakari, Olli and Rice, Kenneth and Meigs, James B and Ericson, Ulrika and Steffen, Lyn M and Rosendaal, Frits R and Hofman, Albert and K{\"a}h{\"o}nen, Mika and Psaty, Bruce M and Brunkwall, Louise and Uitterlinden, Andr{\'e} G and Viikari, Jorma and Siscovick, David S and Sepp{\"a}l{\"a}, Ilkka and North, Kari E and Mozaffarian, Dariush and Dupuis, Jos{\'e}e and Orho-Melander, Marju and Rich, Stephen S and de Mutsert, Ren{\'e}e and Qi, Lu and Pennell, Craig E and Franco, Oscar H and Lehtim{\"a}ki, Terho and Herman, Mark A} } @article {8410, title = {Mendelian randomization analysis does not support causal associations of birth weight with hypertension risk and blood pressure in adulthood.}, journal = {Eur J Epidemiol}, volume = {35}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 Jul}, pages = {685-697}, abstract = {

Epidemiology studies suggested that low birthweight was associated with a higher risk of hypertension in later life. However, little is known about the causality of such associations. In our study, we evaluated the causal association of low birthweight with adulthood hypertension following a standard analytic protocol using the study-level data of 183,433 participants from 60 studies (CHARGE-BIG consortium), as well as that with blood pressure using publicly available summary-level genome-wide association data from EGG consortium of 153,781 participants, ICBP consortium and UK Biobank cohort together of 757,601 participants. We used seven SNPs as the instrumental variable in the study-level analysis and 47 SNPs in the summary-level analysis. In the study-level analyses, decreased birthweight was associated with a higher risk of hypertension in adults (the odds ratio per 1 standard deviation (SD) lower birthweight, 1.22; 95\% CI 1.16 to 1.28), while no association was found between genetically instrumented birthweight and hypertension risk (instrumental odds ratio for causal effect per 1 SD lower birthweight, 0.97; 95\% CI 0.68 to 1.41). Such results were consistent with that from the summary-level analyses, where the genetically determined low birthweight was not associated with blood pressure measurements either. One SD lower genetically determined birthweight was not associated with systolic blood pressure (β = - 0.76, 95\% CI - 2.45 to 1.08~mmHg), 0.06~mmHg lower diastolic blood pressure (β = - 0.06, 95\% CI - 0.93 to 0.87~mmHg), or pulse pressure (β = - 0.65, 95\% CI - 1.38 to 0.69~mmHg, all p > 0.05). Our findings suggest that the inverse association of birthweight with hypertension risk from observational studies was not supported by large Mendelian randomization analyses.

}, issn = {1573-7284}, doi = {10.1007/s10654-020-00638-z}, author = {Zheng, Yan and Huang, Tao and Wang, Tiange and Mei, Zhendong and Sun, Zhonghan and Zhang, Tao and Ellervik, Christina and Chai, Jin-Fang and Sim, Xueling and van Dam, Rob M and Tai, E-Shyong and Koh, Woon-Puay and Dorajoo, Rajkumar and Saw, Seang-Mei and Sabanayagam, Charumathi and Wong, Tien Yin and Gupta, Preeti and Rossing, Peter and Ahluwalia, Tarunveer S and Vinding, Rebecca K and Bisgaard, Hans and B{\o}nnelykke, Klaus and Wang, Yujie and Graff, Mariaelisa and Voortman, Trudy and van Rooij, Frank J A and Hofman, Albert and van Heemst, Diana and Noordam, Raymond and Estampador, Angela C and Varga, Tibor V and Enzenbach, Cornelia and Scholz, Markus and Thiery, Joachim and Burkhardt, Ralph and Orho-Melander, Marju and Schulz, Christina-Alexandra and Ericson, Ulrika and Sonestedt, Emily and Kubo, Michiaki and Akiyama, Masato and Zhou, Ang and Kilpel{\"a}inen, Tuomas O and Hansen, Torben and Kleber, Marcus E and Delgado, Graciela and McCarthy, Mark and Lemaitre, Rozenn N and Felix, Janine F and Jaddoe, Vincent W V and Wu, Ying and Mohlke, Karen L and Lehtim{\"a}ki, Terho and Wang, Carol A and Pennell, Craig E and Schunkert, Heribert and Kessler, Thorsten and Zeng, Lingyao and Willenborg, Christina and Peters, Annette and Lieb, Wolfgang and Grote, Veit and Rzehak, Peter and Koletzko, Berthold and Erdmann, Jeanette and Munz, Matthias and Wu, Tangchun and He, Meian and Yu, Caizheng and Lecoeur, C{\'e}cile and Froguel, Philippe and Corella, Dolores and Moreno, Luis A and Lai, Chao-Qiang and Pitk{\"a}nen, Niina and Boreham, Colin A and Ridker, Paul M and Rosendaal, Frits R and de Mutsert, Ren{\'e}e and Power, Chris and Paternoster, Lavinia and S{\o}rensen, Thorkild I A and Tj{\o}nneland, Anne and Overvad, Kim and Djouss{\'e}, Luc and Rivadeneira, Fernando and Lee, Nanette R and Raitakari, Olli T and K{\"a}h{\"o}nen, Mika and Viikari, Jorma and Langhendries, Jean-Paul and Escribano, Joaquin and Verduci, Elvira and Dedoussis, George and K{\"o}nig, Inke and Balkau, Beverley and Coltell, Oscar and Dallongeville, Jean and Meirhaeghe, Aline and Amouyel, Philippe and Gottrand, Fr{\'e}d{\'e}ric and Pahkala, Katja and Niinikoski, Harri and Hypp{\"o}nen, Elina and M{\"a}rz, Winfried and Mackey, David A and Gruszfeld, Dariusz and Tucker, Katherine L and Fumeron, Fr{\'e}d{\'e}ric and Estruch, Ramon and Ordovas, Jose M and Arnett, Donna K and Mook-Kanamori, Dennis O and Mozaffarian, Dariush and Psaty, Bruce M and North, Kari E and Chasman, Daniel I and Qi, Lu} }