@article {7452, title = {Dairy consumption, systolic blood pressure, and risk of hypertension: Mendelian randomization study.}, journal = {BMJ}, volume = {356}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 03 16}, pages = {j1000}, abstract = {

Objective~To examine whether previous observed inverse associations of dairy intake with systolic blood pressure and risk of hypertension were causal.Design~Mendelian randomization study using the single nucleotide polymorphism rs4988235 related to lactase persistence as an instrumental variable.Setting~CHARGE (Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology) Consortium.Participants~Data from 22 studies with 171 213 participants, and an additional 10 published prospective studies with 26 119 participants included in the observational analysis.Main outcome measures~The instrumental variable estimation was conducted using the ratio of coefficients approach. Using meta-analysis, an additional eight published randomized clinical trials on the association of dairy consumption with systolic blood pressure were summarized.Results~Compared with the CC genotype (CC is associated with complete lactase deficiency), the CT/TT genotype (TT is associated with lactose persistence, and CT is associated with certain lactase deficiency) of LCT-13910 (lactase persistence gene) rs4988235 was associated with higher dairy consumption (0.23 (about 55 g/day), 95\% confidence interval 0.17 to 0.29) serving/day; P<0.001) and was not associated with systolic blood pressure (0.31, 95\% confidence interval -0.05 to 0.68 mm Hg; P=0.09) or risk of hypertension (odds ratio 1.01, 95\% confidence interval 0.97 to 1.05; P=0.27). Using LCT-13910 rs4988235 as the instrumental variable, genetically determined dairy consumption was not associated with systolic blood pressure (β=1.35, 95\% confidence interval -0.28 to 2.97 mm Hg for each serving/day) or risk of hypertension (odds ratio 1.04, 0.88 to 1.24). Moreover, meta-analysis of the published clinical trials showed that higher dairy intake has no significant effect on change in systolic blood pressure for interventions over one month to 12 months (intervention compared with control groups: β=-0.21, 95\% confidence interval -0.98 to 0.57 mm Hg). In observational analysis, each serving/day increase in dairy consumption was associated with -0.11 (95\% confidence interval -0.20 to -0.02 mm Hg; P=0.02) lower systolic blood pressure but not risk of hypertension (odds ratio 0.98, 0.97 to 1.00; P=0.11).Conclusion~The weak inverse association between dairy intake and systolic blood pressure in observational studies was not supported by a comprehensive instrumental variable analysis and systematic review of existing clinical trials.

}, keywords = {Blood Pressure, Dairy Products, Feeding Behavior, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Humans, Hypertension, Lactase, Mendelian Randomization Analysis, Observational Studies as Topic, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic}, issn = {1756-1833}, doi = {10.1136/bmj.j1000}, author = {Ding, Ming and Huang, Tao and Bergholdt, Helle Km and Nordestgaard, B{\o}rge G and Ellervik, Christina and Qi, Lu} } @article {7920, title = {Genome Analyses of >200,000 Individuals Identify 58 Loci for Chronic Inflammation and Highlight Pathways that Link Inflammation and Complex Disorders.}, journal = {Am J Hum Genet}, volume = {103}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Nov 01}, pages = {691-706}, abstract = {

C-reactive protein (CRP) is a sensitive biomarker of chronic low-grade inflammation and is associated with multiple complex diseases. The genetic determinants of chronic inflammation remain largely unknown, and the causal role of CRP in several clinical outcomes is debated. We performed two genome-wide association studies (GWASs), on HapMap and 1000 Genomes imputed data, of circulating amounts of CRP by using data from 88 studies comprising 204,402 European individuals. Additionally, we performed in silico functional analyses and Mendelian randomization analyses with several clinical outcomes. The GWAS meta-analyses of CRP revealed 58 distinct genetic loci (p < 5~{\texttimes} 10). After adjustment for body mass index in the regression analysis, the associations at all except three loci remained. The lead variants at the distinct loci explained up to 7.0\% of the variance in circulating amounts of CRP. We identified 66 gene sets that were organized in two substantially correlated clusters, one mainly composed of immune pathways and the other characterized by metabolic pathways in the liver. Mendelian randomization analyses revealed a causal protective effect of CRP on schizophrenia and a risk-increasing effect on bipolar disorder. Our findings provide further insights into the biology of inflammation and could lead to interventions for treating inflammation and its clinical consequences.

}, issn = {1537-6605}, doi = {10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.09.009}, author = {Ligthart, Symen and Vaez, Ahmad and V{\~o}sa, Urmo and Stathopoulou, Maria G and de Vries, Paul S and Prins, Bram P and van der Most, Peter J and Tanaka, Toshiko and Naderi, Elnaz and Rose, Lynda M and Wu, Ying and Karlsson, Robert and Barbalic, Maja and Lin, Honghuang and Pool, Rene and Zhu, Gu and Mace, Aurelien and Sidore, Carlo and Trompet, Stella and Mangino, Massimo and Sabater-Lleal, Maria and Kemp, John P and Abbasi, Ali and Kacprowski, Tim and Verweij, Niek and Smith, Albert V and Huang, Tao and Marzi, Carola and Feitosa, Mary F and Lohman, Kurt K and Kleber, Marcus E and Milaneschi, Yuri and Mueller, Christian and Huq, Mahmudul and Vlachopoulou, Efthymia and Lyytik{\"a}inen, Leo-Pekka and Oldmeadow, Christopher and Deelen, Joris and Perola, Markus and Zhao, Jing Hua and Feenstra, Bjarke and Amini, Marzyeh and Lahti, Jari and Schraut, Katharina E and Fornage, Myriam and Suktitipat, Bhoom and Chen, Wei-Min and Li, Xiaohui and Nutile, Teresa and Malerba, Giovanni and Luan, Jian{\textquoteright}an and Bak, Tom and Schork, Nicholas and del Greco M, Fabiola and Thiering, Elisabeth and Mahajan, Anubha and Marioni, Riccardo E and Mihailov, Evelin and Eriksson, Joel and Ozel, Ayse Bilge and Zhang, Weihua and Nethander, Maria and Cheng, Yu-Ching and Aslibekyan, Stella and Ang, Wei and Gandin, Ilaria and Yengo, Loic and Portas, Laura and Kooperberg, Charles and Hofer, Edith and Rajan, Kumar B and Schurmann, Claudia and den Hollander, Wouter and Ahluwalia, Tarunveer S and Zhao, Jing and Draisma, Harmen H M and Ford, Ian and Timpson, Nicholas and Teumer, Alexander and Huang, Hongyan and Wahl, Simone and Liu, Yongmei and Huang, Jie and Uh, Hae-Won and Geller, Frank and Joshi, Peter K and Yanek, Lisa R and Trabetti, Elisabetta and Lehne, Benjamin and Vozzi, Diego and Verbanck, Marie and Biino, Ginevra and Saba, Yasaman and Meulenbelt, Ingrid and O{\textquoteright}Connell, Jeff R and Laakso, Markku and Giulianini, Franco and Magnusson, Patrik K E and Ballantyne, Christie M and Hottenga, Jouke Jan and Montgomery, Grant W and Rivadineira, Fernando and Rueedi, Rico and Steri, Maristella and Herzig, Karl-Heinz and Stott, David J and Menni, Cristina and Fr{\r a}nberg, Mattias and St Pourcain, Beate and Felix, Stephan B and Pers, Tune H and Bakker, Stephan J L and Kraft, Peter and Peters, Annette and Vaidya, Dhananjay and Delgado, Graciela and Smit, Johannes H and Gro{\ss}mann, Vera and Sinisalo, Juha and Sepp{\"a}l{\"a}, Ilkka and Williams, Stephen R and Holliday, Elizabeth G and Moed, Matthijs and Langenberg, Claudia and R{\"a}ikk{\"o}nen, Katri and Ding, Jingzhong and Campbell, Harry and Sale, Mich{\`e}le M and Chen, Yii-der I and James, Alan L and Ruggiero, Daniela and Soranzo, Nicole and Hartman, Catharina A and Smith, Erin N and Berenson, Gerald S and Fuchsberger, Christian and Hernandez, Dena and Tiesler, Carla M T and Giedraitis, Vilmantas and Liewald, David and Fischer, Krista and Mellstr{\"o}m, Dan and Larsson, Anders and Wang, Yunmei and Scott, William R and Lorentzon, Matthias and Beilby, John and Ryan, Kathleen A and Pennell, Craig E and Vuckovic, Dragana and Balkau, Beverly and Concas, Maria Pina and Schmidt, Reinhold and Mendes de Leon, Carlos F and Bottinger, Erwin P and Kloppenburg, Margreet and Paternoster, Lavinia and Boehnke, Michael and Musk, A W and Willemsen, Gonneke and Evans, David M and Madden, Pamela A F and K{\"a}h{\"o}nen, Mika and Kutalik, Zolt{\'a}n and Zoledziewska, Magdalena and Karhunen, Ville and Kritchevsky, Stephen B and Sattar, Naveed and Lachance, Genevieve and Clarke, Robert and Harris, Tamara B and Raitakari, Olli T and Attia, John R and van Heemst, Diana and Kajantie, Eero and Sorice, Rossella and Gambaro, Giovanni and Scott, Robert A and Hicks, Andrew A and Ferrucci, Luigi and Standl, Marie and Lindgren, Cecilia M and Starr, John M and Karlsson, Magnus and Lind, Lars and Li, Jun Z and Chambers, John C and Mori, Trevor A and de Geus, Eco J C N and Heath, Andrew C and Martin, Nicholas G and Auvinen, Juha and Buckley, Brendan M and de Craen, Anton J M and Waldenberger, Melanie and Strauch, Konstantin and Meitinger, Thomas and Scott, Rodney J and McEvoy, Mark and Beekman, Marian and Bombieri, Cristina and Ridker, Paul M and Mohlke, Karen L and Pedersen, Nancy L and Morrison, Alanna C and Boomsma, Dorret I and Whitfield, John B and Strachan, David P and Hofman, Albert and Vollenweider, Peter and Cucca, Francesco and Jarvelin, Marjo-Riitta and Jukema, J Wouter and Spector, Tim D and Hamsten, Anders and Zeller, Tanja and Uitterlinden, Andr{\'e} G and Nauck, Matthias and Gudnason, Vilmundur and Qi, Lu and Grallert, Harald and Borecki, Ingrid B and Rotter, Jerome I and M{\"a}rz, Winfried and Wild, Philipp S and Lokki, Marja-Liisa and Boyle, Michael and Salomaa, Veikko and Melbye, Mads and Eriksson, Johan G and Wilson, James F and Penninx, Brenda W J H and Becker, Diane M and Worrall, Bradford B and Gibson, Greg and Krauss, Ronald M and Ciullo, Marina and Zaza, Gianluigi and Wareham, Nicholas J and Oldehinkel, Albertine J and Palmer, Lyle J and Murray, Sarah S and Pramstaller, Peter P and Bandinelli, Stefania and Heinrich, Joachim and Ingelsson, Erik and Deary, Ian J and M{\"a}gi, Reedik and Vandenput, Liesbeth and van der Harst, Pim and Desch, Karl C and Kooner, Jaspal S and Ohlsson, Claes and Hayward, Caroline and Lehtim{\"a}ki, Terho and Shuldiner, Alan R and Arnett, Donna K and Beilin, Lawrence J and Robino, Antonietta and Froguel, Philippe and Pirastu, Mario and Jess, Tine and Koenig, Wolfgang and Loos, Ruth J F and Evans, Denis A and Schmidt, Helena and Smith, George Davey and Slagboom, P Eline and Eiriksdottir, Gudny and Morris, Andrew P and Psaty, Bruce M and Tracy, Russell P and Nolte, Ilja M and Boerwinkle, Eric and Visvikis-Siest, Sophie and Reiner, Alex P and Gross, Myron and Bis, Joshua C and Franke, Lude and Franco, Oscar H and Benjamin, Emelia J and Chasman, Daniel I and Dupuis, Jos{\'e}e and Snieder, Harold and Dehghan, Abbas and Alizadeh, Behrooz Z} } @article {7576, title = {Sugar-sweetened beverage intake associations with fasting glucose and insulin concentrations are not modified by selected genetic variants in a ChREBP-FGF21 pathway: a meta-analysis.}, journal = {Diabetologia}, volume = {61}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Feb}, pages = {317-330}, abstract = {

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) are a major dietary contributor to fructose intake. A molecular pathway involving the carbohydrate responsive element-binding protein (ChREBP) and the metabolic hormone fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) may influence sugar metabolism and, thereby, contribute to fructose-induced metabolic disease. We hypothesise that common variants in 11 genes involved in fructose metabolism and the ChREBP-FGF21 pathway may interact with SSB intake to exacerbate positive associations between higher SSB intake and glycaemic traits.

METHODS: Data from 11 cohorts (six discovery and five replication) in the CHARGE (Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology) Consortium provided association and interaction results from 34,748 adults of European descent. SSB intake (soft drinks, fruit punches, lemonades or other fruit drinks) was derived from food-frequency questionnaires and food diaries. In fixed-effects meta-analyses, we quantified: (1) the associations between SSBs and glycaemic traits (fasting glucose and fasting insulin); and (2) the interactions between SSBs and 18 independent SNPs related to the ChREBP-FGF21 pathway.

RESULTS: In our combined meta-analyses of discovery and replication cohorts, after adjustment for age, sex, energy intake, BMI and other dietary covariates, each additional serving of SSB intake was associated with higher fasting glucose (β~{\textpm}~SE 0.014~{\textpm}~0.004 [mmol/l], p~=~1.5~{\texttimes}~10-3) and higher fasting insulin (0.030~{\textpm}~0.005 [log e pmol/l], p~=~2.0~{\texttimes}~10-10). No significant interactions on glycaemic traits were observed between SSB intake and selected SNPs. While a suggestive interaction was observed in the discovery cohorts with a SNP (rs1542423) in the β-Klotho (KLB) locus on fasting insulin (0.030~{\textpm}~0.011 log e pmol/l, uncorrected p~=~0.006), results in the replication cohorts and combined meta-analyses were non-significant.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: In this large meta-analysis, we observed that SSB intake was associated with higher fasting glucose and insulin. Although a suggestive interaction with a genetic variant in the ChREBP-FGF21 pathway was observed in the discovery cohorts, this observation was not confirmed in the replication analysis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trials related to this study were registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00005131 (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities), NCT00005133 (Cardiovascular Health Study), NCT00005121 (Framingham Offspring Study), NCT00005487 (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) and NCT00005152 (Nurses{\textquoteright} Health Study).

}, issn = {1432-0428}, doi = {10.1007/s00125-017-4475-0}, author = {McKeown, Nicola M and Dashti, Hassan S and Ma, Jiantao and Haslam, Danielle E and Kiefte-de Jong, Jessica C and Smith, Caren E and Tanaka, Toshiko and Graff, Mariaelisa and Lemaitre, Rozenn N and Rybin, Denis and Sonestedt, Emily and Frazier-Wood, Alexis C and Mook-Kanamori, Dennis O and Li, Yanping and Wang, Carol A and Leermakers, Elisabeth T M and Mikkil{\"a}, Vera and Young, Kristin L and Mukamal, Kenneth J and Cupples, L Adrienne and Schulz, Christina-Alexandra and Chen, Tzu-An and Li-Gao, Ruifang and Huang, Tao and Oddy, Wendy H and Raitakari, Olli and Rice, Kenneth and Meigs, James B and Ericson, Ulrika and Steffen, Lyn M and Rosendaal, Frits R and Hofman, Albert and K{\"a}h{\"o}nen, Mika and Psaty, Bruce M and Brunkwall, Louise and Uitterlinden, Andr{\'e} G and Viikari, Jorma and Siscovick, David S and Sepp{\"a}l{\"a}, Ilkka and North, Kari E and Mozaffarian, Dariush and Dupuis, Jos{\'e}e and Orho-Melander, Marju and Rich, Stephen S and de Mutsert, Ren{\'e}e and Qi, Lu and Pennell, Craig E and Franco, Oscar H and Lehtim{\"a}ki, Terho and Herman, Mark A} } @article {8410, title = {Mendelian randomization analysis does not support causal associations of birth weight with hypertension risk and blood pressure in adulthood.}, journal = {Eur J Epidemiol}, volume = {35}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 Jul}, pages = {685-697}, abstract = {

Epidemiology studies suggested that low birthweight was associated with a higher risk of hypertension in later life. However, little is known about the causality of such associations. In our study, we evaluated the causal association of low birthweight with adulthood hypertension following a standard analytic protocol using the study-level data of 183,433 participants from 60 studies (CHARGE-BIG consortium), as well as that with blood pressure using publicly available summary-level genome-wide association data from EGG consortium of 153,781 participants, ICBP consortium and UK Biobank cohort together of 757,601 participants. We used seven SNPs as the instrumental variable in the study-level analysis and 47 SNPs in the summary-level analysis. In the study-level analyses, decreased birthweight was associated with a higher risk of hypertension in adults (the odds ratio per 1 standard deviation (SD) lower birthweight, 1.22; 95\% CI 1.16 to 1.28), while no association was found between genetically instrumented birthweight and hypertension risk (instrumental odds ratio for causal effect per 1 SD lower birthweight, 0.97; 95\% CI 0.68 to 1.41). Such results were consistent with that from the summary-level analyses, where the genetically determined low birthweight was not associated with blood pressure measurements either. One SD lower genetically determined birthweight was not associated with systolic blood pressure (β = - 0.76, 95\% CI - 2.45 to 1.08~mmHg), 0.06~mmHg lower diastolic blood pressure (β = - 0.06, 95\% CI - 0.93 to 0.87~mmHg), or pulse pressure (β = - 0.65, 95\% CI - 1.38 to 0.69~mmHg, all p > 0.05). Our findings suggest that the inverse association of birthweight with hypertension risk from observational studies was not supported by large Mendelian randomization analyses.

}, issn = {1573-7284}, doi = {10.1007/s10654-020-00638-z}, author = {Zheng, Yan and Huang, Tao and Wang, Tiange and Mei, Zhendong and Sun, Zhonghan and Zhang, Tao and Ellervik, Christina and Chai, Jin-Fang and Sim, Xueling and van Dam, Rob M and Tai, E-Shyong and Koh, Woon-Puay and Dorajoo, Rajkumar and Saw, Seang-Mei and Sabanayagam, Charumathi and Wong, Tien Yin and Gupta, Preeti and Rossing, Peter and Ahluwalia, Tarunveer S and Vinding, Rebecca K and Bisgaard, Hans and B{\o}nnelykke, Klaus and Wang, Yujie and Graff, Mariaelisa and Voortman, Trudy and van Rooij, Frank J A and Hofman, Albert and van Heemst, Diana and Noordam, Raymond and Estampador, Angela C and Varga, Tibor V and Enzenbach, Cornelia and Scholz, Markus and Thiery, Joachim and Burkhardt, Ralph and Orho-Melander, Marju and Schulz, Christina-Alexandra and Ericson, Ulrika and Sonestedt, Emily and Kubo, Michiaki and Akiyama, Masato and Zhou, Ang and Kilpel{\"a}inen, Tuomas O and Hansen, Torben and Kleber, Marcus E and Delgado, Graciela and McCarthy, Mark and Lemaitre, Rozenn N and Felix, Janine F and Jaddoe, Vincent W V and Wu, Ying and Mohlke, Karen L and Lehtim{\"a}ki, Terho and Wang, Carol A and Pennell, Craig E and Schunkert, Heribert and Kessler, Thorsten and Zeng, Lingyao and Willenborg, Christina and Peters, Annette and Lieb, Wolfgang and Grote, Veit and Rzehak, Peter and Koletzko, Berthold and Erdmann, Jeanette and Munz, Matthias and Wu, Tangchun and He, Meian and Yu, Caizheng and Lecoeur, C{\'e}cile and Froguel, Philippe and Corella, Dolores and Moreno, Luis A and Lai, Chao-Qiang and Pitk{\"a}nen, Niina and Boreham, Colin A and Ridker, Paul M and Rosendaal, Frits R and de Mutsert, Ren{\'e}e and Power, Chris and Paternoster, Lavinia and S{\o}rensen, Thorkild I A and Tj{\o}nneland, Anne and Overvad, Kim and Djouss{\'e}, Luc and Rivadeneira, Fernando and Lee, Nanette R and Raitakari, Olli T and K{\"a}h{\"o}nen, Mika and Viikari, Jorma and Langhendries, Jean-Paul and Escribano, Joaquin and Verduci, Elvira and Dedoussis, George and K{\"o}nig, Inke and Balkau, Beverley and Coltell, Oscar and Dallongeville, Jean and Meirhaeghe, Aline and Amouyel, Philippe and Gottrand, Fr{\'e}d{\'e}ric and Pahkala, Katja and Niinikoski, Harri and Hypp{\"o}nen, Elina and M{\"a}rz, Winfried and Mackey, David A and Gruszfeld, Dariusz and Tucker, Katherine L and Fumeron, Fr{\'e}d{\'e}ric and Estruch, Ramon and Ordovas, Jose M and Arnett, Donna K and Mook-Kanamori, Dennis O and Mozaffarian, Dariush and Psaty, Bruce M and North, Kari E and Chasman, Daniel I and Qi, Lu} }