@article {1563, title = {Separate and combined associations of body-mass index and abdominal adiposity with cardiovascular disease: collaborative analysis of 58 prospective studies.}, journal = {Lancet}, volume = {377}, year = {2011}, month = {2011 Mar 26}, pages = {1085-95}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Guidelines differ about the value of assessment of adiposity measures for cardiovascular disease risk prediction when information is available for other risk factors. We studied the separate and combined associations of body-mass index (BMI), waist circumference, and waist-to-hip ratio with risk of first-onset cardiovascular disease.

METHODS: We used individual records from 58 cohorts to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) per 1 SD higher baseline values (4.56 kg/m(2) higher BMI, 12.6 cm higher waist circumference, and 0.083 higher waist-to-hip ratio) and measures of risk discrimination and reclassification. Serial adiposity assessments were used to calculate regression dilution ratios.

RESULTS: Individual records were available for 221,934 people in 17 countries (14,297 incident cardiovascular disease outcomes; 1.87 million person-years at risk). Serial adiposity assessments were made in up to 63,821 people (mean interval 5.7 years [SD 3.9]). In people with BMI of 20 kg/m(2) or higher, HRs for cardiovascular disease were 1.23 (95\% CI 1.17-1.29) with BMI, 1.27 (1.20-1.33) with waist circumference, and 1.25 (1.19-1.31) with waist-to-hip ratio, after adjustment for age, sex, and smoking status. After further adjustment for baseline systolic blood pressure, history of diabetes, and total and HDL cholesterol, corresponding HRs were 1.07 (1.03-1.11) with BMI, 1.10 (1.05-1.14) with waist circumference, and 1.12 (1.08-1.15) with waist-to-hip ratio. Addition of information on BMI, waist circumference, or waist-to-hip ratio to a cardiovascular disease risk prediction model containing conventional risk factors did not importantly improve risk discrimination (C-index changes of -0.0001, -0.0001, and 0.0008, respectively), nor classification of participants to categories of predicted 10-year risk (net reclassification improvement -0.19\%, -0.05\%, and -0.05\%, respectively). Findings were similar when adiposity measures were considered in combination. Reproducibility was greater for BMI (regression dilution ratio 0.95, 95\% CI 0.93-0.97) than for waist circumference (0.86, 0.83-0.89) or waist-to-hip ratio (0.63, 0.57-0.70).

INTERPRETATION: BMI, waist circumference, and waist-to-hip ratio, whether assessed singly or in combination, do not importantly improve cardiovascular disease risk prediction in people in developed countries when additional information is available for systolic blood pressure, history of diabetes, and lipids.

FUNDING: British Heart Foundation and UK Medical Research Council.

}, keywords = {Age Factors, Blood Pressure, Body Mass Index, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cholesterol, Cholesterol, HDL, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Abdominal, Proportional Hazards Models, Prospective Studies, Risk Assessment, Sex Factors, Smoking, Systole, Waist Circumference, Waist-Hip Ratio}, issn = {1474-547X}, doi = {10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60105-0}, author = {Wormser, David and Kaptoge, Stephen and Di Angelantonio, Emanuele and Wood, Angela M and Pennells, Lisa and Thompson, Alex and Sarwar, Nadeem and Kizer, Jorge R and Lawlor, Debbie A and Nordestgaard, B{\o}rge G and Ridker, Paul and Salomaa, Veikko and Stevens, June and Woodward, Mark and Sattar, Naveed and Collins, Rory and Thompson, Simon G and Whitlock, Gary and Danesh, John} } @article {1399, title = {Lipid-related markers and cardiovascular disease prediction.}, journal = {JAMA}, volume = {307}, year = {2012}, month = {2012 Jun 20}, pages = {2499-506}, abstract = {

CONTEXT: The value of assessing various emerging lipid-related markers for prediction of first cardiovascular events is debated.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether adding information on apolipoprotein B and apolipoprotein A-I, lipoprotein(a), or lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 to total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) improves cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk prediction.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Individual records were available for 165,544 participants without baseline CVD in 37 prospective cohorts (calendar years of recruitment: 1968-2007) with up to 15,126 incident fatal or nonfatal CVD outcomes (10,132 CHD and 4994 stroke outcomes) during a median follow-up of 10.4 years (interquartile range, 7.6-14 years).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Discrimination of CVD outcomes and reclassification of participants across predicted 10-year risk categories of low (<10\%), intermediate (10\%-<20\%), and high (>=20\%) risk.

RESULTS: The addition of information on various lipid-related markers to total cholesterol, HDL-C, and other conventional risk factors yielded improvement in the model{\textquoteright}s discrimination: C-index change, 0.0006 (95\% CI, 0.0002-0.0009) for the combination of apolipoprotein B and A-I; 0.0016 (95\% CI, 0.0009-0.0023) for lipoprotein(a); and 0.0018 (95\% CI, 0.0010-0.0026) for lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 mass. Net reclassification improvements were less than 1\% with the addition of each of these markers to risk scores containing conventional risk factors. We estimated that for 100,000 adults aged 40 years or older, 15,436 would be initially classified at intermediate risk using conventional risk factors alone. Additional testing with a combination of apolipoprotein B and A-I would reclassify 1.1\%; lipoprotein(a), 4.1\%; and lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 mass, 2.7\% of people to a 20\% or higher predicted CVD risk category and, therefore, in need of statin treatment under Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines.

CONCLUSION: In a study of individuals without known CVD, the addition of information on the combination of apolipoprotein B and A-I, lipoprotein(a), or lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 mass to risk scores containing total cholesterol and HDL-C led to slight improvement in CVD prediction.

}, keywords = {Aged, Biomarkers, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cholesterol, HDL, Cohort Studies, Female, Humans, Lipoproteins, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Assessment}, issn = {1538-3598}, doi = {10.1001/jama.2012.6571}, author = {Di Angelantonio, Emanuele and Gao, Pei and Pennells, Lisa and Kaptoge, Stephen and Caslake, Muriel and Thompson, Alexander and Butterworth, Adam S and Sarwar, Nadeem and Wormser, David and Saleheen, Danish and Ballantyne, Christie M and Psaty, Bruce M and Sundstr{\"o}m, Johan and Ridker, Paul M and Nagel, Dorothea and Gillum, Richard F and Ford, Ian and Ducimetiere, Pierre and Kiechl, Stefan and Koenig, Wolfgang and Dullaart, Robin P F and Assmann, Gerd and D{\textquoteright}Agostino, Ralph B and Dagenais, Gilles R and Cooper, Jackie A and Kromhout, Daan and Onat, Altan and Tipping, Robert W and G{\'o}mez-de-la-C{\'a}mara, Agust{\'\i}n and Rosengren, Annika and Sutherland, Susan E and Gallacher, John and Fowkes, F Gerry R and Casiglia, Edoardo and Hofman, Albert and Salomaa, Veikko and Barrett-Connor, Elizabeth and Clarke, Robert and Brunner, Eric and Jukema, J Wouter and Simons, Leon A and Sandhu, Manjinder and Wareham, Nicholas J and Khaw, Kay-Tee and Kauhanen, Jussi and Salonen, Jukka T and Howard, William J and Nordestgaard, B{\o}rge G and Wood, Angela M and Thompson, Simon G and Boekholdt, S Matthijs and Sattar, Naveed and Packard, Chris and Gudnason, Vilmundur and Danesh, John} }