@article {1496, title = {Differences in prevalence of and risk factors for subclinical vascular disease among black and white participants in the Cardiovascular Health Study.}, journal = {Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol}, volume = {18}, year = {1998}, month = {1998 Feb}, pages = {283-93}, abstract = {

A composite measure of subclinical vascular disease has been developed in the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS). In previous reports, we measured the prevalence of subclinical disease among the original 5201 participants in the CHS, the relationship of risk factors to subclinical disease, and the association of subclinical disease to clinical coronary heart disease. In 1992 to 1993 (year 4 of the study), a larger cohort of 424 black women and 248 black men was added to the study. In this study, we have compared the prevalence of subclinical disease among blacks and whites in the CHS and the association with cardiovascular risk factors. The prevalence of subclinical disease for all participants (aged > or =65 years) was 41.3\% for white women, 39.7\% for black women, 41.9\% for white men, and 43.7\% for black men. The prevalence increased with age. The risk factor associations for subclinical disease were similar among blacks and whites. In multivariate analysis, age, systolic blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, smoking, and family history of myocardial infarction were independently associated with subclinical disease among both black and white women, while for white men, systolic blood pressure, use of antihypertensive medication, smoking, body mass index, and diastolic blood pressure (inverse) were related to subclinical disease. In black men, blood triglyceride level, use of antihypertensive medications, and family history of myocardial infarction (inverse) were associated with subclinical disease.

}, keywords = {African Americans, Aged, Cardiovascular Physiological Phenomena, Cohort Studies, European Continental Ancestry Group, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Multivariate Analysis, Prevalence, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Vascular Diseases}, issn = {1079-5642}, author = {Kuller, L and Fisher, L and McClelland, R and Fried, L and Cushman, M and Jackson, S and Manolio, T} } @article {622, title = {Depressive symptoms and risks of coronary heart disease and mortality in elderly Americans. Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group.}, journal = {Circulation}, volume = {102}, year = {2000}, month = {2000 Oct 10}, pages = {1773-9}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Several epidemiological studies have associated depressive symptoms with cardiovascular disease. We investigated whether depressive symptoms constituted a risk for coronary heart disease (CHD) and total mortality among an apparently healthy elderly cohort.

METHODS AND RESULTS: In a prospective cohort of 5888 elderly Americans (>/=65 years) who were enrolled in the Cardiovascular Health Study, 4493 participants who were free of cardiovascular disease at baseline provided annual information on their depressive status, which was assessed using the Depression Scale of the Center for Epidemiological Studies. These 4493 subjects were followed for 6 years for the development of CHD and mortality. The cumulative mean depression score was assessed for each participant up to the time of event (maximum 6-year follow-up). Using time-dependent, proportional-hazards models, the unadjusted hazard ratio associated with every 5-unit increase in mean depression score for the development of CHD was 1.15 (P:=0.006); the ratio for all-cause mortality was 1.29 (P:<0.0001). In multivariate analyses adjusted for age, race, sex, education, diabetes, hypertension, cigarette smoking, total cholesterol, triglyceride level, congestive heart failure, and physical inactivity, the hazard ratio for CHD was 1.15 (P:=0.006) and that for all-cause mortality was 1.16 (P:=0.006). Among participants with the highest cumulative mean depression scores, the risk of CHD increased by 40\% and risk of death by 60\% compared with those who had the lowest mean scores.

CONCLUSIONS: Among elderly Americans, depressive symptoms constitute an independent risk factor for the development of CHD and total mortality.

}, keywords = {Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cohort Studies, Coronary Disease, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, United States}, issn = {1524-4539}, doi = {10.1161/01.cir.102.15.1773}, author = {Ariyo, A A and Haan, M and Tangen, C M and Rutledge, J C and Cushman, M and Dobs, A and Furberg, C D} } @article {6803, title = {Development and validation of an ankle brachial index risk model for the prediction of cardiovascular events.}, journal = {Eur J Prev Cardiol}, volume = {21}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Mar}, pages = {310-20}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: The ankle brachial index (ABI) is related to risk of cardiovascular events independent of the Framingham risk score (FRS). The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a risk model for cardiovascular events incorporating the ABI and FRS.

DESIGN: An analysis of participant data from 18 cohorts in which 24,375 men and 20,377 women free of coronary heart disease had ABI measured and were followed up for events.

METHODS: Subjects were divided into a development and internal validation dataset and an external validation dataset. Two models, comprising FRS and FRS + ABI, were fitted for the primary outcome of major coronary events.

RESULTS: In predicting events in the external validation dataset, C-index for the FRS was 0.672 (95\% CI 0.599 to 0.737) in men and 0.578 (95\% CI 0.492 to 0.661) in women. The FRS + ABI led to a small increase in C-index in men to 0.685 (95\% CI 0.612 to 0.749) and large increase in women to 0.690 (95\% CI 0.605 to 0.764) with net reclassification improvement (NRI) of 4.3\% (95\% CI 0.0 to 7.6\%, p = 0.050) and 9.6\% (95\% CI 6.1 to 16.4\%, p < 0.001), respectively. Restricting the FRS + ABI model to those with FRS intermediate 10-year risk of 10 to 19\% resulted in higher NRI of 15.9\% (95\% CI 6.1 to 20.6\%, p < 0.001) in men and 23.3\% (95\% CI 13.8 to 62.5\%, p = 0.002) in women. However, incorporating ABI in an improved newly fitted risk factor model had a nonsignificant effect: NRI 2.0\% (95\% CI 2.3 to 4.2\%, p = 0.567) in men and 1.1\% (95\% CI 1.9 to 4.0\%, p = 0.483) in women.

CONCLUSIONS: An ABI risk model may improve prediction especially in individuals at intermediate risk and when performance of the base risk factor model is modest.

}, keywords = {Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Ankle Brachial Index, Cardiovascular Diseases, Europe, European Continental Ancestry Group, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Statistical, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Reproducibility of Results, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Time Factors, United States, Young Adult}, issn = {2047-4881}, doi = {10.1177/2047487313516564}, author = {Fowkes, F G R and Murray, G D and Butcher, I and Folsom, A R and Hirsch, A T and Couper, D J and deBacker, G and Kornitzer, M and Newman, A B and Sutton-Tyrrell, K C and Cushman, M and Lee, A J and Price, J F and D{\textquoteright}Agostino, R B and Murabito, J M and Norman, Pe and Masaki, K H and Bouter, L M and Heine, R J and Stehouwer, C D A and McDermott, M M and Stoffers, H E J H and Knottnerus, J A and Ogren, M and Hedblad, B and Koenig, W and Meisinger, C and Cauley, J A and Franco, Oh and Hunink, M G M and Hofman, A and Witteman, J C and Criqui, M H and Langer, R D and Hiatt, W R and Hamman, R F} }