Title | Carotid intima-media thickness progression to predict cardiovascular events in the general population (the PROG-IMT collaborative project): a meta-analysis of individual participant data. |
Publication Type | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2012 |
Authors | Lorenz, MW, Polak, JF, Kavousi, M, Mathiesen, EB, Völzke, H, Tuomainen, T-P, Sander, D, Plichart, M, Catapano, AL, Robertson, CM, Kiechl, S, Rundek, T, Desvarieux, M, Lind, L, Schmid, C, DasMahapatra, P, Gao, L, Ziegelbauer, K, Bots, ML, Thompson, SG |
Corporate/Institutional Authors | PROG-IMT Study Group, |
Journal | Lancet |
Volume | 379 |
Issue | 9831 |
Pagination | 2053-62 |
Date Published | 2012 Jun 02 |
ISSN | 1474-547X |
Keywords | Cardiovascular Diseases, Carotid Intima-Media Thickness, Disease Progression, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Myocardial Infarction, Prognosis, Risk Assessment, Stroke |
Abstract | <p><b>BACKGROUND: </b>Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) is related to the risk of cardiovascular events in the general population. An association between changes in cIMT and cardiovascular risk is frequently assumed but has rarely been reported. Our aim was to test this association.</p><p><b>METHODS: </b>We identified general population studies that assessed cIMT at least twice and followed up participants for myocardial infarction, stroke, or death. The study teams collaborated in an individual participant data meta-analysis. Excluding individuals with previous myocardial infarction or stroke, we assessed the association between cIMT progression and the risk of cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, stroke, vascular death, or a combination of these) for each study with Cox regression. The log hazard ratios (HRs) per SD difference were pooled by random effects meta-analysis.</p><p><b>FINDINGS: </b>Of 21 eligible studies, 16 with 36,984 participants were included. During a mean follow-up of 7·0 years, 1519 myocardial infarctions, 1339 strokes, and 2028 combined endpoints (myocardial infarction, stroke, vascular death) occurred. Yearly cIMT progression was derived from two ultrasound visits 2-7 years (median 4 years) apart. For mean common carotid artery intima-media thickness progression, the overall HR of the combined endpoint was 0·97 (95% CI 0·94-1·00) when adjusted for age, sex, and mean common carotid artery intima-media thickness, and 0·98 (0·95-1·01) when also adjusted for vascular risk factors. Although we detected no associations with cIMT progression in sensitivity analyses, the mean cIMT of the two ultrasound scans was positively and robustly associated with cardiovascular risk (HR for the combined endpoint 1·16, 95% CI 1·10-1·22, adjusted for age, sex, mean common carotid artery intima-media thickness progression, and vascular risk factors). In three studies including 3439 participants who had four ultrasound scans, cIMT progression did not correlate between occassions (reproducibility correlations between r=-0·06 and r=-0·02).</p><p><b>INTERPRETATION: </b>The association between cIMT progression assessed from two ultrasound scans and cardiovascular risk in the general population remains unproven. No conclusion can be derived for the use of cIMT progression as a surrogate in clinical trials.</p><p><b>FUNDING: </b>Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.</p> |
DOI | 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60441-3 |
Alternate Journal | Lancet |
PubMed ID | 22541275 |
PubMed Central ID | PMC3918517 |
Grant List | HHSN268201100012C / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States HHSN268201100010C / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States R01 AG015928 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States HHSN268201100008C / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States U01 HL080295 / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States N01-HC-85081 / HC / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States R01 DE013094 / DE / NIDCR NIH HHS / United States HHSN268201100007C / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States HHSN268200800007C / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States N01 HC015103 / HC / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States RG/08/014/24067 / / British Heart Foundation / United Kingdom R56 AG020098 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States HHSN268201100011C / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States N01 HC085085 / HC / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States AG-20098 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States N01HC55222 / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States N01-HC-85086 / HC / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States N01HC85086 / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States R37 NS029993 / NS / NINDS NIH HHS / United States AG-027058 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States N01-HC-85082 / HC / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States HHSN268201100006C / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States N01 HC-55222 / HC / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States HHSN268201200036C / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States R37 NS 029993 / NS / NINDS NIH HHS / United States N01-HC-85083 / HC / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States N01-HC-75150 / HC / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States N01-HC-85080 / HC / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States R01 HL080295 / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States N01 HC085084 / HC / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States R01 AG020098 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States N01HC85082 / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States N01HC75150 / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States HHSN268201100009C / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States N01HC85083 / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States HHSN268201100005C / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States MC_U105260792 / / Medical Research Council / United Kingdom N01-HC-85079 / HC / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States HHSN268201200036C / / PHS HHS / United States HL080295 / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States N01-HC-85239 / HC / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States AG-023629 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States N01HC85079 / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States R01 AG023629 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States R01 AG027058 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States N01 HC045133 / HC / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States N01HC85080 / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States N01 HC035129 / HC / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States R56 AG023629 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States N01HC85081 / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States R01 DE 13094 / DE / NIDCR NIH HHS / United States |