You are here

Automatic identification of variables in epidemiological datasets using logic regression.

TitleAutomatic identification of variables in epidemiological datasets using logic regression.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2017
AuthorsLorenz, MW, Abdi, NAshtiani, Scheckenbach, F, Pflug, A, Bülbül, A, Catapano, AL, Agewall, S, Ezhov, M, Bots, ML, Kiechl, S, Orth, A
Corporate/Institutional AuthorsPROG-IMT Study Group,
JournalBMC Med Inform Decis Mak
Volume17
Issue1
Pagination40
Date Published2017 Apr 13
ISSN1472-6947
Abstract<p><b>BACKGROUND: </b>For an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis, multiple datasets must be transformed in a consistent format, e.g. using uniform variable names. When large numbers of datasets have to be processed, this can be a time-consuming and error-prone task. Automated or semi-automated identification of variables can help to reduce the workload and improve the data quality. For semi-automation high sensitivity in the recognition of matching variables is particularly important, because it allows creating software which for a target variable presents a choice of source variables, from which a user can choose the matching one, with only low risk of having missed a correct source variable.</p><p><b>METHODS: </b>For each variable in a set of target variables, a number of simple rules were manually created. With logic regression, an optimal Boolean combination of these rules was searched for every target variable, using a random subset of a large database of epidemiological and clinical cohort data (construction subset). In a second subset of this database (validation subset), this optimal combination rules were validated.</p><p><b>RESULTS: </b>In the construction sample, 41 target variables were allocated on average with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 34%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 95%. In the validation sample, PPV was 33%, whereas NPV remained at 94%. In the construction sample, PPV was 50% or less in 63% of all variables, in the validation sample in 71% of all variables.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS: </b>We demonstrated that the application of logic regression in a complex data management task in large epidemiological IPD meta-analyses is feasible. However, the performance of the algorithm is poor, which may require backup strategies.</p>
DOI10.1186/s12911-017-0429-1
Alternate JournalBMC Med Inform Decis Mak
PubMed ID28407816
PubMed Central IDPMC5390441
Grant ListU01 HL080295 / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States
R01 DE013094 / DE / NIDCR NIH HHS / United States
N01 HC015103 / HC / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States
N01HC55222 / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States
N01HC85086 / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States
R37 NS029993 / NS / NINDS NIH HHS / United States
N01HC85079 / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States
N01 HC035129 / HC / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States
ePub date: 
17/04